Shame the origianl pictures didnt do the shirt or the designer justice. So Im now the proud owner of the snazziest shirt in the league
Shirts
#1
Posted 19 January 2010 - 05:22 PM
Shame the origianl pictures didnt do the shirt or the designer justice. So Im now the proud owner of the snazziest shirt in the league
VIVA THE FEVOLUTION
#2
Posted 19 January 2010 - 06:27 PM
Shame the origianl pictures didnt do the shirt or the designer justice. So Im now the proud owner of the snazziest shirt in the league
i was same, the design looked plain and boring on the picture, you couldnt make out the red detail on it, but having seen it in the flesh its a very smart shirt. havent bought mine yet waiting to see what the away shirt is like.
#3
Posted 19 January 2010 - 08:44 PM
#4
Posted 19 January 2010 - 09:40 PM
A little dickie bird tells me its same design but red in place of the blue
#5
Posted 19 January 2010 - 10:42 PM
Shame the origianl pictures didnt do the shirt or the designer justice. So Im now the proud owner of the snazziest shirt in the league
quite the opposite for me, but each to his own eh.
#6
Posted 20 January 2010 - 06:12 AM
Shame the origianl pictures didnt do the shirt or the designer justice. So Im now the proud owner of the snazziest shirt in the league
after seeing it proper for the first time on sun i could have probably lived with the design but I'm afraid the quality for the price is poor for me, like i've said before 'a glorified T-shirt'
#7
Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:04 AM
#8
Posted 20 January 2010 - 01:10 PM
It was the design I was praising, the material is a little flimsy for a rugby shirt. I dont feel ripped off as I see it for what it is, a limited edition/production item with only a thousand or so being produced. It is also a way of th e club making money and if the club didnt make money from fans there would be no club. If i were buying it from Jon barrie then yes I would feel that I was being ripped off, but buying it from Rovers I am just helping the cause.
VIVA THE FEVOLUTION
#9
Posted 20 January 2010 - 01:14 PM
the shirt is only designed to last for 10 months anyhow
#10
Posted 20 January 2010 - 03:48 PM
so if beer was a tenner a pint, programme 6 quid, golden gamble a fiver would you stump up for it?...for the cause?.....I can understand ya mentality psf but do ya think the sales of shirts would boost if we paid something like £25? more affordable imo
#11
Posted 20 January 2010 - 03:51 PM
If it was a tenner a pint I wouldn't even enter the ground
Think I agree with you Sportbilly, just because we support the club it shouldn't mean we are expected to pay for sub standard stuff "because its helping the club" for that reason alone.
#12
Posted 20 January 2010 - 03:57 PM
#13
Posted 20 January 2010 - 04:00 PM
Think I agree with you Sportbilly, just because we support the club it shouldn't mean we are expected to pay for sub standard stuff "because its helping the club" for that reason alone.
i was trying to compare summat.....all i could think was if my chippy(who i think sell lovely fish) was to start selling sub-standard fish, then pump up the price to a tenner for F&C, I wouldn't keep buying them just to help the chippy's cause, I would still use it, I just wouldn't buy the fish......am I making sense here? I have been on days lol
#14
Posted 20 January 2010 - 04:05 PM
#15
Posted 20 January 2010 - 04:13 PM
Yep, crystal clear!
There's nowt wrong with the club making a profit on the clobber but if the quality is shiiite folk can't be expected to buy it just because "its helping fev" or whatever.
#16
Posted 20 January 2010 - 05:21 PM
I can see your point however the thing with a shirt is it has a much longer life than any of the above, and costs alot more to produce.
You may be right that the club would sell a lot more shirts for £25 but would they make more money?
VIVA THE FEVOLUTION
#17
Posted 20 January 2010 - 06:38 PM
we'll probably never know psf
#18
Posted 20 January 2010 - 11:12 PM
You may be right that the club would sell a lot more shirts for £25 but would they make more money?
It might sell more shirts but it would make less profit. If they really wanted to maximise profit they would put the price UP.
100 shirts @ £40 = £400
90 shirts @ £50 = £450
Edited by DMS, 20 January 2010 - 11:14 PM.
#19
Posted 21 January 2010 - 10:22 AM
#20
Posted 21 January 2010 - 02:26 PM














