"Rugby" on the other hand can clearly mean just what anyone wants it to mean, no more, no less. A bit wishy-washy, frankly. However, I don't think we should hand the term to the RFU on a plate. We should stake a claim to the word "rugby", but stick with "RLFC" officially.
"Rugby"
#21
Posted 26 April 2010 - 06:52 PM
"Rugby" on the other hand can clearly mean just what anyone wants it to mean, no more, no less. A bit wishy-washy, frankly. However, I don't think we should hand the term to the RFU on a plate. We should stake a claim to the word "rugby", but stick with "RLFC" officially.
Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.
#22
Posted 26 April 2010 - 07:09 PM
#23
Posted 26 April 2010 - 07:24 PM
It's not the clubs - it's the presence of the roadsigns, which for obvious reasons tend to be in prominent positions at motorway junctions. The sign to Wakefield is at the end of the A650 dual carriageway link to the M1. The brown sign to Headingley on the M62 just says "Headingley Stadium" without mentioning the sports that are played there - given that it's a current international cricket stadium I suppose that's understandable.
Are St Helens still St Helens RFC btw? It certainly used to say that at Knowsley Road.
If all the new grounds come off that would be an opportunity too, for Wakey, Salford, and Saints. There is a Union side in Cas on Willowbridge Lane so that might be difficult.
Edited by Trojan, 26 April 2010 - 07:26 PM.
#24
Posted 26 April 2010 - 07:30 PM
The fact is that Union has convinced people that 'Rugby' is Union, and by referring to our clubs simply as Rugby, it can make their game seem bigger in certain areas. We are Rugby League and think it is right to use the title (just as I think Union should be using Rugby Union as it's title).
Totally agree with all of that , though I could not give a s**t about the last bit as that game is a total non-starter with me and does not even get a mention, apart that is, when I emphasise then to all and sundry (or anyone caring to hear) that I am a supporter of RUGBY...................League that is, then add firmly, that I have no interest in the union code as it is ######!
Sorry if I have over stated my fake feelings CKN, but infact there is nothing at all faked about them, as I am and remain very serious over the matter.
#25
Posted 26 April 2010 - 07:37 PM
YES we have dropped the term rugby,we want no confusion here in Holland and want to let people know we are a LEAGUE club.
Three other teams kick off the Grand Prix Nights (GPN's) season on may 1st.
Gouda Bearcats LEAGUE club,Capelle Spartans LEAGUE club and Haagland Pacific Island Knights LEAGUE club
As the game has a very short history over here we dont think this is a problem and not being associated with the after match pranks that union is known for in Holland, we hope we can attract a better quality of human being.
Maybe in the future this will also convince the goverment sports councils (NOC NSF) that LEAGUE is a sport in its own right.
Now we have to hope the bond change the only connection still left which is The Nederland RUGBY League Bond.
England is different I agree, but over here we feel we can develop better by dropping the word rugby.
#26
Posted 26 April 2010 - 07:57 PM
Which league?
Team summary: http://folding.extre....php?s=&t=43780
#27
Posted 26 April 2010 - 08:02 PM
Paley my old mucker "League" is a new word in the dutch language and we have claimed it
#28
Posted 26 April 2010 - 09:14 PM
Just to stop the inevitable grumbling and fake outrage, I'm going to try an experiment and leave this here for a while on the rugby league forum. I'm going to see if people are capable of a sensible conversation without willy-waggling and abuse.
ONE post that is, in my subjective opinion, even slightly off-colour and it gets moved to the hell-hole of the cross-code forum. No second chances.
#29
Posted 26 April 2010 - 09:20 PM
That's all right then.
#30
Posted 26 April 2010 - 09:25 PM
#31
Posted 26 April 2010 - 09:47 PM
Edited by audois, 26 April 2010 - 09:47 PM.
"Un grand bravo pour tout ce que vous avez fait, et merci de m'avoir embarqué dans cette aventure."
"Just as we had been Cathars, we were treizistes, men apart."
Jean Roque, Calendrier-revue du Racing-Club Albigeois, 1958-1959
"It involves matters much greater than drafting the new rules...the original and existing games have their own powerful appeal to their players and public and have the sentiments which history inspires"
Harold 'Jersey' Flegg 1933
#32
Posted 26 April 2010 - 10:03 PM
Me too
Less of the RLFC pal
#33
Posted 27 April 2010 - 09:38 AM
Are St Helens still St Helens RFC btw? It certainly used to say that at Knowsley Road.
If all the new grounds come off that would be an opportunity too, for Wakey, Salford, and Saints. There is a Union side in Cas on Willowbridge Lane so that might be difficult.
Sadly I think that all this would make the casual passer-by think is that Wakey, Salford etc have big time rugby union clubs.
The way things are is that in the North, the word "rugby" can be interpreted as referring to one of two games depending on who you are talking to and where you are. It might always mean "league" in Wigan but this certainly isn't true of the North in general; in many parts of the North it would generally mean "union".
In the rest of the UK, there just isn't any ambiguity (except possibly in Wrexham); if you talk about "rugby" then it almost always going to be understood as meaning "union".
#34
Posted 27 April 2010 - 11:12 AM
The way things are is that in the North, the word "rugby" can be interpreted as referring to one of two games depending on who you are talking to and where you are. It might always mean "league" in Wigan but this certainly isn't true of the North in general; in many parts of the North it would generally mean "union".
In the rest of the UK, there just isn't any ambiguity (except possibly in Wrexham); if you talk about "rugby" then it almost always going to be understood as meaning "union".
Are the casual passers by in the north different from the casual passers by in the south?
Team summary: http://folding.extre....php?s=&t=43780
#35
Posted 28 April 2010 - 07:21 PM
The way things are is that in the North, the word "rugby" can be interpreted as referring to one of two games depending on who you are talking to and where you are. It might always mean "league" in Wigan but this certainly isn't true of the North in general; in many parts of the North it would generally mean "union".
In the rest of the UK, there just isn't any ambiguity (except possibly in Wrexham); if you talk about "rugby" then it almost always going to be understood as meaning "union".
Rugby means RL in Wakey - always has done, even when they had a pretty good Union side playing at College Grove. Underwood, Cusworth, Barley, Harrison all played for Wakefield Union at some time in the seventies and eighties. But Wakefield Trinity are a name in RL history and Rugby in Wakey will always mean Trinity. In Fev no explanation is necessary.
#36
Posted 28 April 2010 - 08:22 PM
Does any other town / city that has both codes say those terms to describe the codes / teams ?
#37
Posted 28 April 2010 - 09:35 PM
Does any other town / city that has both codes say those terms to describe the codes / teams ?
Before the advent of Leeds Union, "Leeds Rugby" always meant Leeds RLFC as distinct from LUFC, "Wigan Rugby" always meant Central Park too I believe.
#38
Posted 29 April 2010 - 05:57 AM
#39
Posted 29 April 2010 - 05:59 AM
#40
Posted 29 April 2010 - 11:22 AM
Err yeah. Them dasrn sarf will be cockerneys.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













