Under 18's Academy
Started by
Bomb Jack
, juin 08 2010 03:33
50 replies to this topic
#1
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 03:33
It's nice to see us up there in the Top 5 Teams again. Hopefully this will bear fruit towards a License for 2012-2015.
http://www.widnesvik...cle.php?id=1906
Group A
St Helens +200
Wigan Warriors +168
Widnes Vikings +74
Leeds Rhinos +72
Hull Kingston Rovers +20
http://www.widnesvik...cle.php?id=1906
Group A
St Helens +200
Wigan Warriors +168
Widnes Vikings +74
Leeds Rhinos +72
Hull Kingston Rovers +20
Widnes - Super League's newest Club, and Cheshire's Original Glamour Club. Watch out Warrington, we're back !
#2
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 03:55
Have you got an Under 15's team?
Been to watch many reserves games and the Featherstone side would beat some of the 'Super League' Academy sides.
It's very enjoyable watching the skill and flair that these lads have to show.
Been to watch many reserves games and the Featherstone side would beat some of the 'Super League' Academy sides.
It's very enjoyable watching the skill and flair that these lads have to show.
2008 RFL Wakefield & District Young Volunteer of the Year
#3
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 04:01
Why no points next to Crusdaers and Catalans?
#4
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 05:18
QUOTE (MamaKangaroo @ Jun 8 2010, 05:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why no points next to Crusdaers and Catalans? 
Catalans run theirs in French Academy and Crusaders run theirs in the National Youth League
#5
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 05:19
The table is now split into three based on points difference, and the teams play home and away against the other members of their group:
Group A
St Helens +200
Wigan Warriors +168
Widnes Vikings +74
Leeds Rhinos +72
Hull Kingston Rovers +20
_______________
Group B
Warrington Wolves +6
Wakefield T Wildcats +2
Castleford Tigers -18
Harlequins RL -36
Bradford Bulls -40
_______________
Group C
Hull FC -115
Salford -139
Huddersfield -234
Catalans
Crusaders
I look forward to seeing Widnes' top quality u18s come through into our first team, and hopefully play SL rugby in our 'adequate' stadium sometime after 2012.
Group A
St Helens +200
Wigan Warriors +168
Widnes Vikings +74
Leeds Rhinos +72
Hull Kingston Rovers +20
_______________
Group B
Warrington Wolves +6
Wakefield T Wildcats +2
Castleford Tigers -18
Harlequins RL -36
Bradford Bulls -40
_______________
Group C
Hull FC -115
Salford -139
Huddersfield -234
Catalans
Crusaders
I look forward to seeing Widnes' top quality u18s come through into our first team, and hopefully play SL rugby in our 'adequate' stadium sometime after 2012.
Ce message a été modifié par Vengeance - 08 juin 2010 - 06:59 .
#6
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 08:57
QUOTE (bowes @ Jun 8 2010, 06:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Catalans run theirs in French Academy and Crusaders run theirs in the National Youth League
Cheers!
#7
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 09:11
Crusaders will play SL academy football and be replaced in Gillete NYL by SW Scorpions u18s i believe
#8
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 09:26
A couple of Widnes players can consider themselves unlucky not to make the England u/18.
Everything under the sun is in tune
But the sun is eclipsed by the moon
But the sun is eclipsed by the moon
#9
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 10:48
Here are some Tries from the Under 18's Vs Hull KR
http://vimeo.com/12345914
That big No 12 for us looks handy
http://vimeo.com/12345914
That big No 12 for us looks handy
Widnes - Super League's newest Club, and Cheshire's Original Glamour Club. Watch out Warrington, we're back !
#10
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 11:13
QUOTE (Bomb Jack @ Jun 8 2010, 11:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That big No 12 for us looks handy 
Seems to have a touch of the Sam Burgess about him. Similar style IMO
Then wisdom says: cherish your days, worry only lets your time slip away
Push away the thief trying to steal your gift, the fighter is the one whose feet are swift.
Push away the thief trying to steal your gift, the fighter is the one whose feet are swift.
#11
Posté 08 juin 2010 - 11:24
QUOTE (Johnoco @ Jun 8 2010, 11:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Seems to have a touch of the Sam Burgess about him. Similar style IMO
hope to see widness back in superleague soon. they were my team back in the mid 80's with jonathan davies, offiah and tait.
#12
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 12:07
Apparently No 12 is Adam Lawton, and he is almost 17 !
Widnes - Super League's newest Club, and Cheshire's Original Glamour Club. Watch out Warrington, we're back !
#13
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 08:52
QUOTE (Bomb Jack @ Jun 9 2010, 01:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Apparently No 12 is Adam Lawton, and he is almost 17 ! 
Shhh BJ! They will ALL want one!
#14
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 09:57
Widnes - Super League's newest Club, and Cheshire's Original Glamour Club. Watch out Warrington, we're back !
#15
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 10:13
There is no way an under 18's academy should be used solely a reference for SL decisions.
For a start in some towns, e.g. Leigh, the local amateur clubs are the clubs of choice for most youngsters at such a young age. Why should we be punished for this path being chosen. Would it be better to eradicate amatuer systems to push these academies?
Why not include the depth of talent on a broader level within each town, including amatuer Under 17,18,19's teams?
Also some clubs (e.g. Bradford, Wire) stack their under 18's academies with lad from outside their town because they have the money to snare them. How the hell is that fair?
For a start in some towns, e.g. Leigh, the local amateur clubs are the clubs of choice for most youngsters at such a young age. Why should we be punished for this path being chosen. Would it be better to eradicate amatuer systems to push these academies?
Why not include the depth of talent on a broader level within each town, including amatuer Under 17,18,19's teams?
Also some clubs (e.g. Bradford, Wire) stack their under 18's academies with lad from outside their town because they have the money to snare them. How the hell is that fair?
#16
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 10:33
the production line is up and running, what better way to spend money than in youth development, as opposed to the quick fix of artificial glory.
"Why is Napoleon crying ?" said one sailor to the other, "poor ###### thinks he's being exiled to st helens" came the reply.
#17
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 10:37
QUOTE (Lobbygobbler @ Jun 9 2010, 11:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There is no way an under 18's academy should be used solely a reference for SL decisions.
For a start in some towns, e.g. Leigh, the local amateur clubs are the clubs of choice for most youngsters at such a young age. Why should we be punished for this path being chosen. Would it be better to eradicate amatuer systems to push these academies?
Why not include the depth of talent on a broader level within each town, including amatuer Under 17,18,19's teams?
Also some clubs (e.g. Bradford, Wire) stack their under 18's academies with lad from outside their town because they have the money to snare them. How the hell is that fair?
For a start in some towns, e.g. Leigh, the local amateur clubs are the clubs of choice for most youngsters at such a young age. Why should we be punished for this path being chosen. Would it be better to eradicate amatuer systems to push these academies?
Why not include the depth of talent on a broader level within each town, including amatuer Under 17,18,19's teams?
Also some clubs (e.g. Bradford, Wire) stack their under 18's academies with lad from outside their town because they have the money to snare them. How the hell is that fair?
Ok, lets include u16 academies as well. Most championship clubs dont even have one. Ours is merrily beating the SL teams it plays against.
But seriously, how can the SL make a judgment on outside organisations? Theyd be here till doomsday with clubs claiming all sorts of feeder teams and streams of potential players and income. There has to be a cutoff somewhere and the logical place is the actual applicant club itself? In any case, as a side note, I'd say there is very little to choose between the amateur talent in Leigh, Widnes or for that matter, Barrow, Featherstone etc, so theres no real gain to be made by including it, except where there blatantly is LESS, like Sheffield for example.
#18
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 10:59
QUOTE (Vengeance @ Jun 9 2010, 11:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ok, lets include u16 academies as well. Most championship clubs dont even have one. Ours is merrily beating the SL teams it plays against.
But seriously, how can the SL make a judgment on outside organisations? Theyd be here till doomsday with clubs claiming all sorts of feeder teams and streams of potential players and income. There has to be a cutoff somewhere and the logical place is the actual applicant club itself? In any case, as a side note, I'd say there is very little to choose between the amateur talent in Leigh, Widnes or for that matter, Barrow, Featherstone etc, so theres no real gain to be made by including it, except where there blatantly is LESS, like Sheffield for example.
But seriously, how can the SL make a judgment on outside organisations? Theyd be here till doomsday with clubs claiming all sorts of feeder teams and streams of potential players and income. There has to be a cutoff somewhere and the logical place is the actual applicant club itself? In any case, as a side note, I'd say there is very little to choose between the amateur talent in Leigh, Widnes or for that matter, Barrow, Featherstone etc, so theres no real gain to be made by including it, except where there blatantly is LESS, like Sheffield for example.
also its a case of having a structue in place.. for the club itself.. IIRC the academies have to be set up in a certain way as well, education the kids beyond just how to play RL, a case of getting them set for life after RL or if it doesnt work out etc which is a good thing..
but an u18 academy is not the sole reference for a sl franchise as a stadium is not the sole reference.. it is part of a greater whole.. if Leigh dont believe they need an academy becuase the amateur youth sorts it all out then that is absolutely fine its 1 point.. there are 9 others to aim for.. you ony need aabout 5 to be up towards the top of the tree for a liscence.. but the other bits need to be good. its horses for courses..
#19
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 11:34
What I don't get about the Under 18s is it's about 10 games but they're set to overlap with the National Youth League. Either it should be a full season OR it should be a short season with players going back to their clubs, giving players a choice between just 10 games or messing about their club by playing just the first half of the season really isn't on
#20
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 11:45
QUOTE (RP London @ Jun 9 2010, 11:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
if Leigh dont believe they need an academy becuase the amateur youth sorts it all out then that is absolutely fine its 1 point..
No it isn't
If they dont have an Academy then they have to demonstrate to the RFL that they are the ones who are developing these kids who play with the amateur teams.
Maybe Lobby can enlighten us as to how exactly Leigh are developing these kids in a way that matches the level of development they would receive from playing in an Academy ?
Oh and Lobby, before you give us chapter & verse about how Leigh has the best amateur teams in the country go and check the results as to which town has the best youth team (U16's in the county) - i'll give you a clue, its NOT Leigh !!!
0 utilisateur(s) en train de lire ce sujet
0 membre(s), 0 invité(s), 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s)













