Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Ben Cockayne's two match ban...

Started by Old Frightful , juil. 22 2010 04:51

Please log in to reply

6 replies to this topic

#1 Old Frightful

Coach

Coach
9 931 Messages :

Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 04:51

According to the paper, Hull KR fans have accused the RFL disciplinary panel of inconsistency, after Cockayne received the severest punishment. So the paper contacted the RFL to ask them to justify it...

http://www.thisishul...il/article.html

"His poor disciplinary record in Super League-which had seen him referred to the disciplinary panel six times in four years-and his entering of a "not guilty" plea to the charge of fighting, were also taken into consideration"

On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....

"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"

Posted Image

Retour en haut

#2 deluded pom?

Coach

Coach
7 226 Messages :

Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 04:58

QUOTE (Old Frightful @ Jul 22 2010, 05:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

"His poor disciplinary record in Super League-which had seen him referred to the disciplinary panel six times in four years-and his entering of a "not guilty" plea to the charge of fighting, were also taken into consideration"

He must be even dumber than I thought he was.

Retour en haut

#3 Tommy The C5t

Manager

Coach
13 479 Messages :

Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 05:20

QUOTE (Old Frightful @ Jul 22 2010, 05:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

According to the paper, Hull KR fans have accused the RFL disciplinary panel of inconsistency, after Cockayne received the severest punishment. So the paper contacted the RFL to ask them to justify it...

http://www.thisishul...il/article.html

"His poor disciplinary record in Super League-which had seen him referred to the disciplinary panel six times in four years-and his entering of a "not guilty" plea to the charge of fighting, were also taken into consideration"

Retour en haut

#4 deluded pom?

Coach

Coach
7 226 Messages :

Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 05:25

Did Hudgell advise him by any chance?

Retour en haut

#5 Tommy The C5t

Manager

Coach
13 479 Messages :

Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:11

QUOTE (deluded pom? @ Jul 22 2010, 06:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Did Hudgell advise him by any chance?

I saw his tv advert earlier today with the bloke doing 60mph on the city ring road with mobile phone in hand

Retour en haut

#6 Old Frightful

Coach

Coach
9 931 Messages :

Posté 23 juillet 2010 - 09:19

QUOTE (deluded pom? @ Jul 22 2010, 06:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Did Hudgell advise him by any chance?

That's a very good point. Surely it's in the interest of all clubs to present the best case for any of their players up before the beak. And as I imagine the RFL disciplinary panel will have watched the game and will have all the video evidence they need, clearly a "not guilty" verdict on the charge of fighting was lunacy.

On 13/2/2013, Hull City's owners the Allams, released a statement in their position as the owners of the KC Stadium Management Committee. One line in this statement read as follows....

"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"

Posted Image