104 replies to this topic

[1976PMJwires]

You're not wrong.

Is that the winning try a few weeks ago

[petero]

OMG WTF


I have thought about your post and agree in parts, but then on reflection, Warringtons defense was top notch, they tried new things in attack (and they came off) and their handling skills / pace / flair was good.


Wires wanted it more than Cats, to say they shouldn't be in SL, they are above Quins in the league.

(if you read all my posts, i not a french lover, but your chat is ###### (buts thats my opinion )

Wendall, Warringtons defence was top notch against a very poor/inferior side? Tell me the same after the final, which, incidentally, I will be supporting them in.

Catalans were not capable in your words of " wanting it "!
I am not being anti-expansionist by any means but be fair that offering by them was abyssmal and they deserve no credit under any circumstance imaginable.
Your aside that presently Harlequins are below them has got nothing at all to do with that performance on Sunday, which was to be honest deploreable.
That was without any excuse permissable, a mismatch and as stated previously there are at least three NL1 sides who would have put on a better, certainly in the very least an equal performance.

The names bandied about on here by those who favour expansion ( and I am one of those) are often directed at Wakefield or Castleford primarily, should either of those be named as not being worthy of S/L status and Cats are, then the entire process of selection or preference requires a very careful examination.

[Scubby]

I am not being anti-expansionist by any means but be fair that offering by them was abyssmal and they deserve no credit under any circumstance imaginable.
Your aside that presently Harlequins are below them has got nothing at all to do with that performance on Sunday, which was to be honest deploreable.
That was without any excuse permissable, a mismatch and as stated previously there are at least three NL1 sides who would have put on a better, certainly in the very least an equal performance.

So do you know three NL1 sides that would have beaten Saints (away), Warrington (home) and Bradford (away) over the last four weeks?

Catalans had a nightmare day. Completely underperformed. It happens. That is all.

[TWD]

First three pages of this thread are about how Catalans are in form and looking good, next three pages are about how Catalans are ###### and not good enough to givr any top team a game.

Strange that.

[1976PMJwires]

Wendall, Warringtons defence was top notch against a very poor/inferior side? Tell me the same after the final, which, incidentally, I will be supporting them in.

Catalans were not capable in your words of " wanting it "!
I am not being anti-expansionist by any means but be fair that offering by them was abyssmal and they deserve no credit under any circumstance imaginable.
Your aside that presently Harlequins are below them has got nothing at all to do with that performance on Sunday, which was to be honest deploreable.
That was without any excuse permissable, a mismatch and as stated previously there are at least three NL1 sides who would have put on a better, certainly in the very least an equal performance.

The names bandied about on here by those who favour expansion ( and I am one of those) are often directed at Wakefield or Castleford primarily, should either of those be named as not being worthy of S/L status and Cats are, then the entire process of selection or preference requires a very careful examination.

Agree with the last part