Andy Wilson's latest offering
#1
Posted 05 August 2010 - 02:32 PM
http://www.guardian....ty-super-league
#2
Posted 05 August 2010 - 02:52 PM
"Widnes supporters might as well start checking out the route maps to Hull now (not that it's a very complicated journey – get on the M62 at one end and drive all the way to the other)"
....is this guy for real? It irks me to think that someone with such a thinly veiled loathing of our game is in the privileged position of writing about it for a living.
#3
Posted 05 August 2010 - 03:06 PM
Anyway Burt go enjoy your holiday and get buying pasties.
#4
Posted 05 August 2010 - 03:06 PM
#5
Posted 05 August 2010 - 03:09 PM
Trolling, obviously.
We've got a 300k cap and they have a super league one. Duh. No one could ever make the step up if this was actually something worth considering.
#6
Posted 05 August 2010 - 03:11 PM
CLASSY CAS 4EVA
Go Go Go York City Knights!
#7
Posted 05 August 2010 - 03:23 PM
We've got a 300k cap and they have a super league one. Duh. No one could ever make the step up if this was actually something worth considering.
No, not really.
Exactly what calibre of players do you expect Widnes to attract?
You're currently 8th in a league of 12, which isnt exactly groundbreaking, nor attractive.
I'd expect you'd be getting whoever loses their licences' cast-offs and a smattering of out of contract players.
Having a fairly new stadium and surviving off Wigan and Saints' academy players ad infinitum doesnt really seem too stable a plan.
It would seem to me that the main reason Widnes would get a licence is that the RFL feel duty-bound after picking Salford over them last time.
Bit of a sad state of affairs really.
The best team should go up. Otherwise it makes a mockery of a team bothering to actually win games.
#8
Posted 05 August 2010 - 03:40 PM
There are only 10 in our League. Shows how much you know.
But Licencing is about the strongest Clubs, NOT the strongest Teams.
#9
Posted 05 August 2010 - 03:43 PM
Exactly what calibre of players do you expect Widnes to attract?
You're currently 8th in a league of 12, which isnt exactly groundbreaking, nor attractive.
I'd expect you'd be getting whoever loses their licences' cast-offs and a smattering of out of contract players.
Having a fairly new stadium and surviving off Wigan and Saints' academy players ad infinitum doesnt really seem too stable a plan.
It would seem to me that the main reason Widnes would get a licence is that the RFL feel duty-bound after picking Salford over them last time.
Bit of a sad state of affairs really.
The best team should go up. Otherwise it makes a mockery of a team bothering to actually win games.
Don't be pathetic.
First off, you said we wouldn't beat Wakefield on the pitch. DURRRRRRR. Don't add caveats.
Our academy is full to the brim of Widnesians, we have the odd player from outside the town but the overwhelming majority are home town players. You've done no research in this, you've been trolling for a few days, you've done no research. TROLL.
Now behave.
#10
Posted 05 August 2010 - 04:05 PM
Exactly what calibre of players do you expect Widnes to attract?
You're currently 8th in a league of 12, which isnt exactly groundbreaking, nor attractive.
I'd expect you'd be getting whoever loses their licences' cast-offs and a smattering of out of contract players.
Having a fairly new stadium and surviving off Wigan and Saints' academy players ad infinitum doesnt really seem too stable a plan.
It would seem to me that the main reason Widnes would get a licence is that the RFL feel duty-bound after picking Salford over them last time.
Bit of a sad state of affairs really.
The best team should go up. Otherwise it makes a mockery of a team bothering to actually win games.
A few points here. Widnes would be able to attract the same players that Wakefield currently have and have had in the their super league tenure. To say Wakey would beat Widnes every day of the week is valid but its no surprise. Stating a fairly obvious point, just like saying a semi pro team would beat an amateur club all the time, its pretty obvious.
Your last point sums it up for me, I couldn't agree more. The whole franchise set up, puts sporting achievements fairly low on the pecking order of "boxes to tick" in relation to other things.
#11
Posted 05 August 2010 - 04:12 PM
After months of messages, press releases, statements and so on all stating the facts re: Outline Planning Permission and Full Planning Permission he still makes the basic error of confusing the two
He chooses to ignore the fact that Wakefield has he full funding if/when they get the Planning approval for the stadium.
He states that Wakefield has ruled out a ground share but they have not, they have ruled out moving to Glasshoughton. On the same subject he chooses to ignore that Castleford have done the same in reverse.
What a ridiculously flawed and lazy article this and Andy Wilson both are
#12
Posted 05 August 2010 - 05:00 PM
Unfortunately, that would mean we'd have to concern ourselves with actual results on the field of play rather than the more important matters of crowd size and stadium size.
Probably a silly idea. That's why you can see that no other sport has ever thought of it. We could call it something like .. er .. promotion and relegation. No. It would never work. Too unfair. Let's kick out Wakefield and promote Widnes .... who are where in the League this season? Ah ... yes.
#13
Posted 05 August 2010 - 05:42 PM
#14
Posted 05 August 2010 - 06:04 PM
#15
Posted 05 August 2010 - 06:34 PM
Everyone makes mistakes!
Since were all friends lets split the difference and agree on 11!
Photographs;
Wigan v St Helens
Huddersfield v Wigan
Wigan v Warrington
Salford v Wigan
Older Rugby Matches
Football Photos
Futsal Photos
My website
#16
Posted 05 August 2010 - 10:49 PM
Unfortunately, that would mean we'd have to concern ourselves with actual results on the field of play rather than the more important matters of crowd size and stadium size.
Probably a silly idea. That's why you can see that no other sport has ever thought of it. We could call it something like .. er .. promotion and relegation. No. It would never work. Too unfair. Let's kick out Wakefield and promote Widnes .... who are where in the League this season? Ah ... yes.
Only really relevant if you want RL to continue as a sport where at the elite level it is confined to a few small towns in the north west and some areas of yorkshire and humberside.
#17
Posted 06 August 2010 - 06:51 AM
Sam Tomkins - Rugby League Week 14.03.12I was sat on the Underground train, and there was a girl looking at me. She was pretty good looking,too, I thought, "something's wrong here - girls as hot as that don't take an interest in me".
Then she came over and said - in a really strong Cockney acent - "excuse me, are you Sam Tomkins?".
She asked me for my autograph, and I was made up...until she asked me to make it out to her boyfriend. I was gutted, I thought she wanted my number
Benji Marshall discovering about Sydney "fan" loyality (Benji - page 245)After we were well beaten by South Sydney at the Sydney Cricket Ground in 2010, a coupl;e of kids maybe eight or nine years old took their Wests Tigers jerseys off as I was walking off the field and threw them at me. "What's this" I said "You can have the jersey" one of them said "we don't go for West Tigers anymore". Then they ran back to their parents who were laughing. That was difficult to take, having kids who look up to you do that. I just dropped the jerseys on the ground and kept walking. It's not like we go out and lose by 50 points on purpose
#18
Posted 06 August 2010 - 08:05 AM
Unfortunately, that would mean we'd have to concern ourselves with actual results on the field of play rather than the more important matters of crowd size and stadium size.
Probably a silly idea. That's why you can see that no other sport has ever thought of it. We could call it something like .. er .. promotion and relegation. No. It would never work. Too unfair. Let's kick out Wakefield and promote Widnes .... who are where in the League this season? Ah ... yes.
I'm sure the RFL are taring up the franchise rulebook as we speak after that constructive Wildean argument.
Play off mini league winner - 2002. Bronze Medalist - 2003. Big Split Group Winner - 2006. Minor Stupidship - 2005, 2006. Cup Silver Medalist - 2008, 2009
CHAMPION - 2005, 2009, 2010
#19
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:31 AM
Unfortunately, that would mean we'd have to concern ourselves with actual results on the field of play rather than the more important matters of crowd size and stadium size.
Probably a silly idea. That's why you can see that no other sport has ever thought of it. We could call it something like .. er .. promotion and relegation. No. It would never work. Too unfair. Let's kick out Wakefield and promote Widnes .... who are where in the League this season? Ah ... yes.
Im sorry, such rational arguments aren't allowed on this forum.
#20
Posted 06 August 2010 - 01:44 PM
Why don't we just revert back to the time when RL was just one division.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













