Vikings announce financial figures
#41
Posted 29 August 2010 - 08:09 AM
i dont know armchair RL fans were such experts at accountancy
perhaps they should lend their considerable skills to helping their own club make a profit
#42
Posted 29 August 2010 - 05:45 PM
i dont know armchair RL fans were such experts at accountancy
perhaps they should lend their considerable skills to helping their own club make a profit
Hey I'mpositive about this news, in my club any RL club making a profit of 1 penny is a good result and worthy of their salt. But simple maths is used for the calculation of £15 x 3000 fans x 15 home games, ok you can argue the other 800 pay something too, but even at full price that brings total fan income through the gate of about £800k.
So the rest of the £2.5 million income must come from somewhere the question is where?
I would assume some from the RFL, some from TV, some from prize money, some from sponsorship, some from merchandise, and some corporate but even I would struggle to believe this would be around double what they get in off the gate. I'm sure the chairman in the last financial year for license has added some to make certain the application is as good as possible, the question is how much?
If it only adds to the profit all well and good, if it changes the figures from loss to profit then the results are not as positive as have been made out.
Even the Chinese and the Cubans gave up on these marxist principles years ago.
SL with a reduced number of competitors and a closed market = North Korea.
#43
Posted 29 August 2010 - 05:55 PM
i dont know armchair RL fans were such experts at accountancy
perhaps they should lend their considerable skills to helping their own club make a profit
Is it hard to believe that RL fans can grasp basic accountancy? Just because you struggle with basic figures, doesn't mean everyone does!
#44
Posted 30 August 2010 - 12:29 AM
seriously all these armchair accounting genii should be helping out at their RL clubs
use their immense talents for the good of RL.
#45
Posted 30 August 2010 - 07:58 AM
The Stobart Stdium could well replace Lourdes on the back of this.
a million quid up ###### creek one year, a million quid in the back pocket the next
where has that two million come from? And the timing nothing short of eerie.
who think that life is but a joke
#46
Posted 30 August 2010 - 08:02 AM
if that is the case, then the serious fraud squad are missing a trick
who think that life is but a joke
#47
Posted 30 August 2010 - 09:08 AM
#48
Posted 30 August 2010 - 10:07 AM
The Stobart Stdium could well replace Lourdes on the back of this.
a million quid up ###### creek one year, a million quid in the back pocket the next
where has that two million come from? And the timing nothing short of eerie.
perhaps some of the profits are connected to write backs of previous losses.
since no one on here questioned the size of their losses i dont see why people should question the profits?
widnes got slagged by everyone for their losses - me included
now its reversed ill give them the praise they deserve
clearly the situation has turned around markedly there
#49
Posted 30 August 2010 - 10:26 AM
#50
Posted 30 August 2010 - 12:27 PM
fair enough
but as i said were people critiquing it when they lost millions of pounds?
why is it only when its good news people criticise it?
personally i think its connected with the past losses. or perhaps previously there were one off extraordinary expenses?
either way its certainly a turnaround from the years before their sugar daddy got on board (forgot his name)
good luck to widnes theyve certainly turned things around since 3 years ago and will make a great addition to SL.
#51
Posted 30 August 2010 - 03:27 PM
since no one on here questioned the size of their losses i dont see why people should question the profits?
widnes got slagged by everyone for their losses - me included
now its reversed ill give them the praise they deserve
clearly the situation has turned around markedly there
I'm not slagging them off
it's a massive and quick turn around of fortune for the club and therefore worthy of discussion
who think that life is but a joke
#52
Posted 30 August 2010 - 04:31 PM
That's a serious allegation to make with absolutely no information to back it up.
#53
Posted 30 August 2010 - 06:02 PM
I'm not making the allegation you dummy. The person I was responding to was making the allegation. have another look.
He's saying that the Vikings receive preferential treatment because there is a councillor on the board. IF THAt is the case(and I doubt it), then it's a serious issue.
who think that life is but a joke
#54
Posted 30 August 2010 - 06:08 PM

WIDNES VIKINGS CHESHIRES MOST FAMOUS RUGBY LEAGUE CLUB
#55
Posted 30 August 2010 - 06:20 PM
He's saying that the Vikings receive preferential treatment because there is a councillor on the board. IF THAt is the case(and I doubt it), then it's a serious issue.
The councillor is on the board on behalf of the council who have a stake in the club, so any preferential treatment I would imagine has council backing.
#56
Posted 30 August 2010 - 06:43 PM
I know why he/she is on the board. But when you start talking about 'preferential treatment' and councils, like this person was doing then it doesn't look right., which was my point. For this to happen would be very untoward, and I doubt very much that it is. Compris?
who think that life is but a joke
#57
Posted 30 August 2010 - 07:27 PM
Why is it untoward ? Councils often give sporting clubs preferential treatment if they have economic benefit to the area. For example, one issue that has come out of Whitehaven's current situation is that Copeland Council have been forced to admit that they acted as guarantor for £125k worth of loans and overdrafts for the club and now look like having to cough up public money to settle them. Would they offer that kind of guarantee to any other privately owned business ?
#58
Posted 30 August 2010 - 07:29 PM
This season, we post a profit, and people wont actually accept the figure and accuse us of "fudging" them.
People will believe what they want to believe and most of the time they don't want to believe Widnes are a capable, well run club. We're debt free and operating well, we all have the same information on this at this stage, so speculation is largely pointless, but you'd think people would leave it at that.
#59
Posted 30 August 2010 - 07:37 PM
then it isn't preferential treatment is it?
It can be a valid act of social policy.
maybe the council shouldn't have given that guarantee. If I was a council tax payer in Whitehaven I would be concerned.
If the council in its actions were doing things wjich only benefitted the club and not the community then it would be preferential treatment.
How much does Whitehaven RLFC man to the local communities, what is its worth top those people? Hopw much do the communities represnted by the Coiuncil benefit from the eitence of the club? What was all that council tax payers' money used for? There don't seem to be y developments at the club.
who think that life is but a joke
#60
Posted 30 August 2010 - 07:39 PM
This season, we post a profit, and people wont actually accept the figure and accuse us of "fudging" them.
People will believe what they want to believe and most of the time they don't want to believe Widnes are a capable, well run club. We're debt free and operating well, we all have the same information on this at this stage, so speculation is largely pointless, but you'd think people would leave it at that.
I want to believe that everything is OK at Widnes
I wonder whether you'd ask questions if a simillar situation existed at another club?
It's perfectly valid to be interested in and ask questions about what is going on here.
Edited by l'angelo mysterioso, 30 August 2010 - 07:39 PM.
who think that life is but a joke
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













