Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 400 - Out Now!

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 400 - OUT NOW!
84 pages, 38 years of history from Open Rugby to the present day.
Click here for the digital edition to read online via smartphone, tablet and desktop devices including iPhone, iPad, Android & Kindle HD.
Click here to order a copy for delivery by post. Annual subscriptions also available worldwide.
Find out what's inside Issue 400
/ View a Gallery of all 400 covers / WH Smith Branches stocking Issue 400
Read Jamie Jones-Buchanan's Top 5 RLW Interviews including Marwan Koukash, Lee Briers, Gareth Thomas, Steve Ganson & Matt King OBE


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Disciplinary


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 davo99

davo99
  • Coach
  • 283 posts

Posted 15 September 2010 - 05:53 PM

It's bad enough stuff being let go completely (already done to death) but when someone does actually get banned, they turn up, trot out some 'I shouldn't banned coz I'm a good lad really', and they're instantly let off.

What's the point???

#2 Allan Marsden

Allan Marsden
  • Banned
  • 433 posts

Posted 15 September 2010 - 06:43 PM

There is no point and any club / player that does not appeal wants certifying. The disciplinary system does not make the job of match officials any easier. Rather, it makes it harder. You only have to look at the positive impact Jim Comans had upon the NRL to see the benefit of a tough stance.

#3 Blind side johnny

Blind side johnny
  • Coach
  • 9,057 posts

Posted 16 September 2010 - 09:22 AM

QUOTE (Allan Marsden @ Sep 15 2010, 07:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There is no point and any club / player that does not appeal wants certifying. The disciplinary system does not make the job of match officials any easier. Rather, it makes it harder. You only have to look at the positive impact Jim Comans had upon the NRL to see the benefit of a tough stance.



Rubbish!

If you are unsuccessful with an appeal then you are likely to get the ban extended and the fine increased.

It is possible for any tribunal/court of law to get their decisions wrong you know - that's why they have appeal panels.
Believe what you see, don't see what you believe.


John Ray (1627 - 1705)

#4 bird

bird
  • Coach
  • 2,135 posts

Posted 16 September 2010 - 09:45 AM

Out of interest, anybody know how much it costs to appeal?

#5 davo99

davo99
  • Coach
  • 283 posts

Posted 16 September 2010 - 11:10 AM

QUOTE (Blind side johnny @ Sep 16 2010, 10:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rubbish!

If you are unsuccessful with an appeal then you are likely to get the ban extended and the fine increased.

It is possible for any tribunal/court of law to get their decisions wrong you know - that's why they have appeal panels.

I'd agree that that's how it used to be - you appealed, still guilty, extra 2 games for your cheek.

The last couple though, the offenders have still been found guilty of the original offence and just had the bans dropped.

#6 indomitable

indomitable
  • Coach
  • 288 posts

Posted 16 September 2010 - 11:23 AM

It appears your ban remains if not involved in a vital cup match, but now we have seen two recent removal of bans despite the fine standing.
Not a very good message to send out, and I recall Sykes of the Bulls putting his hand up saying he was guilty of a 'spear' tackle earlier in the season and taking the fine and suspension without complaint. The disciplinary committee are sending out a poor message, and I cannot think of any cases particularly in SL, where the punishment has been increased following a unsuccessful appeal.

#7 Brigg Rover

Brigg Rover
  • Coach
  • 1,944 posts

Posted 17 September 2010 - 01:32 PM

The popular one that I have seen this year is 1 game ban plus 300 fine. Appeal then turned into 0 game ban and 500 fine ohmy.gif so it looks to me that a game is worth 200 to the appeals committee. Are they on a % do you think?

#8 Allan Marsden

Allan Marsden
  • Banned
  • 433 posts

Posted 17 September 2010 - 10:01 PM

QUOTE (Blind side johnny @ Sep 16 2010, 10:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rubbish!

If you are unsuccessful with an appeal then you are likely to get the ban extended and the fine increased.

It is possible for any tribunal/court of law to get their decisions wrong you know - that's why they have appeal panels.


How often does an unsuccessful appeal result in an extended ban so if you want to shout rubbish get your argument straight and supported with information.

#9 adelwire

adelwire
  • Coach
  • 905 posts

Posted 17 September 2010 - 10:16 PM

When I went to Bayhorse tonight someone was telling me who was on the disciplinary committee. Do we actually know this info in the public domain?

#10 Allan Marsden

Allan Marsden
  • Banned
  • 433 posts

Posted 17 September 2010 - 10:39 PM

QUOTE (adelwire @ Sep 17 2010, 11:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
When I went to Bayhorse tonight someone was telling me who was on the disciplinary committee. Do we actually know this info in the public domain?


Does it not change though fairly regularly. I believe Colin Clarke was on it for the Wigan v Leeds cases.

#11 amh

amh
  • Moderator
  • 11,083 posts

Posted 18 September 2010 - 01:00 AM

QUOTE (adelwire @ Sep 17 2010, 11:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
When I went to Bayhorse tonight someone was telling me who was on the disciplinary committee. Do we actually know this info in the public domain?


rfl info

Whilst I do not suffer fools gladly, I will always gladly make fools suffer

A man is getting along on the road of wisdom when he realises that his opinion is just an opinion


#12 southstand loiner

southstand loiner
  • Coach
  • 2,657 posts

Posted 18 September 2010 - 12:17 PM

a wonderful thing was the 3 man panel that decided buderus deserved a 1 match ban in effect next weeks game against wigan had 2 exwigan players on it so he got a 1 match ban.
on appeal the 3 man panel had no exwigan players on it but had 1 exleeds player on it result no ban.

all seems perfectly fair to me.
ah a sunday night in front of the telly watching old rugby league games.
does life get any better .




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users