Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Interview with Tas Baiteri


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#21 thirteenthman

thirteenthman

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,023 posts

Posted 18 November 2010 - 10:55 AM

QUOTE (Big Picture @ Nov 17 2010, 11:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you think that by saying we can't expect the Pacific Island countries to bring the game big benefits means I think we should discourage them from playing or abandon the World Cup you're mistaken. On the contrary, all countries should be encouraged but the RLIF should focus on ones that do have the standing for people to rate them and therefore the development of RL in those countries might impress the media and sponsors and in so doing add commercial value to international RL. Realistically that means countries in Europe and North America and others like Japan. Not as easy I know, but necessary for the game to flourish.

Apologies for the misunderstanding. I can see where you're coming from, but realistically the Pacific Nations are the strongest area for growth at the moment, even if that means using heritage qualified players. The sport is light years away from having even a meaningful presence in the US. Internal politics has intervened in Russia, and all the other European nations are basically just running small comps as a way of forming international teams.

What holds the sport back is the focus on club football - SL and NRL - that's where all the money goes. The game at international level needs big money investment. I just don't see where it's going to come from. Most developing nations seem to rely on one or two individuals to drive it. When they leave, the momentum goes and the interest is lost. What it needs is a strong RLIF to back these people up with finance and actual help. I guess that's where your point about adding commercial value comes in again.


#22 bird

bird

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,108 posts

Posted 18 November 2010 - 01:01 PM

QUOTE (Big Picture @ Nov 18 2010, 12:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They can do that because those teams play the big countries in tournaments that include many countries that are big draws for crows, TV and sponsorship dollars. Their games bring in the money from all those sources to underwrite the games in places like Valetta and Nicosia. That's what RL lacks, and what it needs.


Only one reason they are there - voting fodder for the administrators at the top.

#23 Big Picture

Big Picture

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts

Posted 18 November 2010 - 05:38 PM

QUOTE (thirteenthman @ Nov 18 2010, 11:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Apologies for the misunderstanding. I can see where you're coming from, but realistically the Pacific Nations are the strongest area for growth at the moment, even if that means using heritage qualified players. The sport is light years away from having even a meaningful presence in the US. Internal politics has intervened in Russia, and all the other European nations are basically just running small comps as a way of forming international teams.

I disagree about the Pacific nations being a stronger area for growth than others. Does any team in one of their domestic competitions draw as well as the Jacksonville Axemen? I don't have figures on it but somehow I think not. Actually RL's prospects in the US are a lot better than you suggest. RL is unique among international sports in having many parallels to the most popular of American sports, American football. The millions of Americans who've grown up with that sport will find RL easy to understand since it has all the same basic concepts. That allows RL to be promoted there as an international brand of football in the American sense of the word. Apparently some people in the Jacksonville media already consider RL "the other football" from what I've read. That combined with its' low cost make the proposed US pro league a ground floor opportunity for well-heeled Americans wanting to get into the pro sports business, and there are probably thousands of them around. With the right plan there could be a natural fit.

QUOTE (thirteenthman @ Nov 18 2010, 11:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What holds the sport back is the focus on club football - SL and NRL - that's where all the money goes. The game at international level needs big money investment. I just don't see where it's going to come from. Most developing nations seem to rely on one or two individuals to drive it. When they leave, the momentum goes and the interest is lost. What it needs is a strong RLIF to back these people up with finance and actual help. I guess that's where your point about adding commercial value comes in again.

Financially RL is a long way behind other pro sports, especially internationally. The AU$5 million profit from the last World Cup is peanuts compared to other sports' World Cups, a small drop in the bucket. The game needs to broaden its' reach to places that can add big bucks to that to catch up. The US is the place to make that happen. American TV networks spend $ billions every year broadcasting sports, there's huge potential if RL can reach even a fraction of the millions of Americans who watch sports. One NCAA conference earns $200 million a year from TV (CBS and ESPN) all by itself. That's more than double what 9 and Fox combined are currently paying the NRL -- for college sports! Getting a piece of that pie would do more for RL than anything else ever could.

Is it easy to do? Not even remotely as I'm sure all those in American RL could attest. Would it the best thing that ever happened to the game? You bet your life it would.

Edited by Big Picture, 18 November 2010 - 05:44 PM.


#24 thirteenthman

thirteenthman

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,023 posts

Posted 18 November 2010 - 07:20 PM

QUOTE (Big Picture @ Nov 18 2010, 05:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That combined with its' low cost make the proposed US pro league a ground floor opportunity for well-heeled Americans wanting to get into the pro sports business, and there are probably thousands of them around. With the right plan there could be a natural fit.

Of course, if a US pro league did get under way, the Pacific Islanders would be a good target for recruitment. smile.gif

By the way, what's the state of play in Canada these days with RL domestically?


#25 deluded pom?

deluded pom?

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7,229 posts

Posted 18 November 2010 - 07:33 PM

QUOTE (thirteenthman @ Nov 18 2010, 07:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
By the way, what's the state of play in Canada these days with RL domestically?



http://www.canadarugbyleague.com/

#26 Big Picture

Big Picture

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts

Posted 18 November 2010 - 10:48 PM

QUOTE (thirteenthman @ Nov 18 2010, 08:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Of course, if a US pro league did get under way, the Pacific Islanders would be a good target for recruitment. smile.gif

Nice effort, but there's a pool of thousands of former college and high school football players in the US who'd have more drawing power for fans, and based what we know of guys like Nate Smith and the Pope brothers you'd have to think there'd be a good number who could do well in the game.


QUOTE (thirteenthman @ Nov 18 2010, 08:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
By the way, what's the state of play in Canada these days with RL domestically?

I'm not personally involved in things here, I don't know of there being particular interest in my area yet but would gladly help out if/when there is. They seem to have got off to a pretty good start considering it's barely been a year yet and they have to play at the same time of year as RU due to the climate here. To make a lot of progress they'll need to get enough set up to make it worthwhile for guys playing RU to give that up since it's the same season.

I hope the Atlantic Cup won't take any wind out of their sails since their players have only a couple of games of RL under their belts at this point.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users