What a nasty person. I actually think this abusive language needs to stop, I don't mind heated debate but this has crossed the line.
Why do you consider my post nasty? I'd happily withdraw and apologise for the abusive language, that is if you would be so kind as to point it out.
'You remind me of a poster from way back. He used to mention the NF too (which I note you have done in other posts).'
What part of that is you not comparing me to a formerly racist poster on here, whose identity is too obvious to need naming (I can if you still won't admit the clear meaning of your words)? Yet you have been abusive at me for daring to interpret the very clear meaning of your words
Was there a poster on here that was racist then? I hope you put them straight. You mentioned the NF out of the blue then accused me of saying that the majority of the country agreed with them. One of the most bizarre things that I've ever read on here.
I have political disagreements with L'Angelo Mysterioso as well to give one example, but got nothing against him as unlike you he seems a pleasant enough person.
Well that's your personal opinion. Again rather a personal post, I thought you wanted this 'abusive language' to stop. Make your mind up.
Followers of Islam have white skin, brown skin, yellow skin, black skin; as do Christians and even would you believe it Jews. Race is a red herring there. Plus it is the ideology I am against, the people are individuals, some of which including those mentioned in the topic of the thread are nasty, some are pleasant people in spite of their religion, or perhaps because they follow a more liberal form of it.
I'm well aware that the various faiths/superstitions/religions have followers of different skin colour. Surely the point which you claim people can be nice/nasty in any religion has been kind of the point that people that have opposed your view throughout this thread have been making; not to generalise and to make sweeping judgements.
Your argument is very comical though as I can't seriously believe you're saying I can only criticise Islam if I equally criticise every religion as if they were exactly equal bad in everything
I have no reason to have anything strongly against Quakerism or Sikhism for example, yet apparently if you disagree with one religion you have to equally disagree with them all
I'll equally disagree with religions when they're equally wrong, but not for the sake of political correctness.
Political correctness gone mad tends to be the distress call of the thwarted bigot (as one poster put on here way back when). If the cap fits.
Okay despite it being away from the topic of the thread I am against:
Aggressive Zionism from some Jews represented in Israeli policy
Extremist Christianity in parts of Africa, India and the USA
Buddhist extremists from Sri Lanka
The extremist Shinto of WW2 Japan
Well done. Is that a complete list, or will you be adding more as and when you manage to google more?
Just for a start. It is not the religion of Islam that is especially evil, but the grip a religion has on a society. In 2010 UK Islam has the strongest grip (albeit only in parts of the country), if you asked me 100 years ago which religion had the most harmful effect on society in the UK, then that would have been Christianity.
Christianity has a far bigger impact on society than Islam in my view. Which days/hours are businesses not allowed to trade because of Islamic belief system for instance? How many children are fed Islamic belief as fact at state funded schools in this country? Why are all the shops full of gifts at this time of year?
You've been lurking all day and that's the best you could manage. I'd pack it in if I were you?