http://www.dailytele...r-1225960396640
He beat the AFL testers so how many other AFL players have beaten the AFL testers as well?
How poor are the AFL drug testers?
Started by
The Future is League
, Nov 24 2010 04:49 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 24 November 2010 - 04:49 PM
#2
Posted 24 November 2010 - 05:20 PM
I believe the AFL still operate a 'three strikes' system, before a drug-taker is punished, let alone have his name released to the media.
This allows them to add another strand to their 'holier than thou' act.
This allows them to add another strand to their 'holier than thou' act.
"Journalists are meant to be neutral, for God's sake." - Stephen 'Wiggy' Jones
"Perhaps it would be better that future criticism of sports be made on the narrow basis of what is being discussed, without reference to other sports, unless those sports offer a solution to the problem in hand." - Brian 'Pigface' Moore
"What happens in rugby union? A player takes the ball, moves forward a little and gets tackled. A whole load of players then roll about on the ground. Pheep! The referee gives a penalty." - Simon Barnes
"Perhaps it would be better that future criticism of sports be made on the narrow basis of what is being discussed, without reference to other sports, unless those sports offer a solution to the problem in hand." - Brian 'Pigface' Moore
"What happens in rugby union? A player takes the ball, moves forward a little and gets tackled. A whole load of players then roll about on the ground. Pheep! The referee gives a penalty." - Simon Barnes
#3
Posted 24 November 2010 - 05:41 PM
QUOTE (Futtocks @ Nov 24 2010, 05:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I believe the AFL still operate a 'three strikes' system, before a drug-taker is punished, let alone have his name released to the media.
This allows them to add another strand to their 'holier than thou' act.
This allows them to add another strand to their 'holier than thou' act.
so that suggests to me that the AFL has a very lax attitude to drug abuse.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













