siddal for the nwc league?
#1
Posted 13 December 2010 - 11:12 PM
#2
Posted 14 December 2010 - 12:00 AM
#3
Posted 14 December 2010 - 12:46 AM
I'd cross the Pennines to get away from Queens !
#4
Posted 14 December 2010 - 06:18 AM
#5
Posted 14 December 2010 - 07:07 AM
IT'S ABOUT TIME SOMETHING WAS DONE WITH THESE THUGS.
Every season we get to hear about these mindless thugs, and if it means a well respected club like Siddal are taking a stance by moving the the NWC, because no action is taken against them, the pennine league should be ashamed of themselves.
#6
Posted 14 December 2010 - 10:33 AM
I reckon some would cross the fckn Himalayas to get away from Queens.
#7
Posted 14 December 2010 - 10:43 AM
I reckon some would cross the fckn Himalayas to get away from Queens.
#8
Posted 14 December 2010 - 06:58 PM
Think most clubs wud like rid of queens ,granted they r a very good team on the pitch......but the antics of their low life so called supporters shame the game of rugby league,=..why cant they just go in to leeds centfr and cause their trouble there..GOOD RIDDANCE !!!
#9
Posted 14 December 2010 - 07:35 PM
#10
Posted 14 December 2010 - 09:50 PM
I don't think it's owt to do with Queens, it's down to the stupid Pennine League rules regarding 1st team players not being allowed to play for 2nds meaning some lads are missing out on games leaving the 2nds and 3rds short of players
#11
Posted 15 December 2010 - 09:25 AM
#12
Posted 15 December 2010 - 11:30 AM
#13
Posted 15 December 2010 - 11:33 AM
###### Siddal and all non Lancastrian sides. They should not be allowed into the NWC. Its bad enough Cumbrian sheep shaggers are allowed in. If you don't like it, go make a league with your animal molesting friends in Cumbrian! A CumbroYorks league, get all the half breeds together.
#14
Posted 15 December 2010 - 11:35 AM
they have the same rules in nwc,if the lads have played more than 6 1st team games the're counted as 1st team players and u can only play 4 in your team,its not right because come towards end of season we,ve had lads thats played more 2nd team games than 1st but because they've been helping out 1st because of injuries the're then classed as a 1st teamer so we've had to leave lads out in important games
#15
Posted 15 December 2010 - 11:36 AM
Not only will dropping the 3rd team release players to other clubs (if so desired) but it would also encourage the lads who want to play for Siddal to buck their ideas up and fight for those places.
#16
Posted 15 December 2010 - 11:40 AM
Not only will dropping the 3rd team release players to other clubs (if so desired) but it would also encourage the lads who want to play for Siddal to buck their ideas up and fight for those places.
Too much coffee today?
He balanced the hot areas with the cold areas. the dry areas with the wet areas.
And, in creating Yorkshire, he created the most glorious place on earth - full of majestic beauty and sporting giants.........and for balance he created....... Lancashire.
#17
Posted 15 December 2010 - 12:35 PM
A nice intelligent and well thought out post there......
#18
Posted 15 December 2010 - 01:08 PM
#19
Posted 15 December 2010 - 03:00 PM
It shows
Why on earth would any side want to disband one of its teams?
So they can scrap for places or move to other clubs, give your head a shake Mr Pringle
He balanced the hot areas with the cold areas. the dry areas with the wet areas.
And, in creating Yorkshire, he created the most glorious place on earth - full of majestic beauty and sporting giants.........and for balance he created....... Lancashire.
#20
Posted 15 December 2010 - 03:37 PM
If NWC have the same rule then why would Siddal gain anything by moving across? The pennine league tried to make an ammendment to their constitution in a special general meeting but not enough clubs attended for a vote to take place. It might have been something to do with how the rule was written, I think rule would have only been used by Siddal and Oulton.
Do the NWC and NCL not do cards? Maybe Siddal think they can play who they want where in NWC
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













