New Stadium Thread
#1
Posted 23 December 2010 - 09:41 AM
THESE are the first images showing how York’s multi-million pound new community stadium could look, as developers get ready to unveil outline plans in the New Year.
Tim Atkins, the stadium’s project manager, said the developers, Oakgate Ltd, were hoping to submit an outline planning application to City of York Council in February.
He said this would include proposals for a new 6,000-seater stadium at Monks Cross for York City FC and York City Knights Rugby League Club, as well as plans for a huge shopping development on neighbouring land.
As previously reported in The Press, this retail development is seen as crucial to providing the commercial cash needed to fund the stadium project.
Mr Atkins said: “We have worked very hard just to get to this stage. Much of that work has had to be conducted behind the scenes, often with little to show in the public arena.
“At times this has led to doubts about us, our credibility and our desire to make this stadium a reality. But I’m pleased to say we’re finally in a position to change all that, and we can now begin lifting the lid on this project. Make no bones, we intend to make this community stadium a reality.”
Yesterday, Mr Atkins and other key figures behind the stadium project came together at York’s Guildhall to pledge their commitment to building the community stadium, as well as a new home for City of York Athletics Club, by 2014.
Kersten England, chief executive of City of York Council, Jason McGill, chairman of York City FC, Neil Hunter, from City of York Athletics Club, and Mr Atkins all put pen to paper to sign a memorandum of understanding.
But conspicuous by his absence was York City Knights’ chief John Guildford, who said the club could not commit to the project until they were given more specific information.
He said: “I’m totally confused with it all and until we have a proposal I don’t know how we can say yes or no.”
Mr Atkins said he was “very disappointed” Mr Guildford had decided not to sign the agreement.


YORK CITY KNIGHTS CHAMPIONSHIP 1 PLAY OFF FINAL WINNERS 2010
#2
Posted 23 December 2010 - 10:54 PM
#3
Posted 24 December 2010 - 07:48 AM
Rubbish, after next season you'll be lucky to get 600 never mind 6,000
#4
Posted 24 December 2010 - 08:13 AM
Very cutting that Winnie,every person has the right to say somthing stupid but your abusing the privilege.
ALA
#5
Posted 24 December 2010 - 08:36 AM
This coming from a fan of a club that only gets gates over 500 when a big club like York vsits the spacious South Leeds Stand.
Edited by Spanish Knight, 24 December 2010 - 08:37 AM.
#6
Posted 24 December 2010 - 10:11 AM
#7
Posted 24 December 2010 - 10:17 AM
Looks ######, whats the point of 6000, might as well keep the ground as it is!

"Nihil sine Deo" "We've Swept The Seas Before Boys, & So We Shall Again" "More than a club"
#8
Posted 24 December 2010 - 10:41 AM
Saint Helens Stadium - (13th paragraph) and the home of our last,unforgettable victory on 26th September,Halliwell Jones Stadium seems to have been accomplished due to their involvement.
#9
Posted 24 December 2010 - 10:46 AM
#10
Posted 24 December 2010 - 11:02 AM
In my opinion it is geared towards the football club with the larger standing areas behind the posts. The side standing are (currently Pop Stand) looks for like an elongated dugout. Don't do rugby behind the sticks - sorry.
#11
Posted 24 December 2010 - 12:11 PM
I think you'll find it's an all seater.
#13
Posted 24 December 2010 - 04:38 PM
Mr Atkins is trying to justify the fee he has been recieving from us the tax payer for the last four years.
Dosnt work for me fella!!!!
You are a glass half empty chap Ian! Why so negative? Wouldn't it be better to get behind the team involved in moving the community stadium forward?
Edited by White Knight, 24 December 2010 - 04:39 PM.
#14
Posted 24 December 2010 - 07:31 PM
Edited by andyacko, 24 December 2010 - 07:33 PM.
#15
Posted 24 December 2010 - 08:14 PM
I agree totally, how can anyone sign upto an MOU or partnering charter without understanding all the facts or terms and conditions, I find it ridiculous that someone has been on >£50k pa to plan this new stadia. My only concern is that despite being incumbent we may end up homeless as a club if a stalemate position were the outcome as I suspect if it does go ahead it wouldn't need YCK necessarily.
#16
Posted 24 December 2010 - 08:14 PM
I agree totally, how can anyone sign upto an MOU or partnering charter without understanding all the facts or terms and conditions, I find it ridiculous that someone has been on >£50k pa to plan this new stadia. My only concern is that despite being incumbent we may end up homeless as a club if a stalemate position were the outcome as I suspect if it does go ahead it wouldn't need YCK necessarily.
#17
Posted 24 December 2010 - 09:58 PM
Too many questions and not enough answers from a Knights fans view.
Millican Dalton...1867-1947
#18
Posted 25 December 2010 - 09:31 AM
r u trying to say that john guilfords glass is totally empty then i dont see him been positive i see him been the only one to speak his mind about these muppetts and i for one are 100% with him on this now take a good look at the whole picture
#19
Posted 28 December 2010 - 02:53 PM
#20
Posted 29 December 2010 - 03:34 PM
Hey Willie how you doing see you still have your witticism, we can also dream but we can also be realist's, positive thinking gets results, your negativity will get you nothing now go play with your tonka toy, pjm.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















