Come in number 12
Started by
Piggy's mate
, janv. 12 2011 05:12
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posté 12 janvier 2011 - 05:12
Looking on the RFL web page for the 2011 league table in Championship it looks like there is space for A.N.Other! Same goes for CC1
P W L D PF PA DIFF BNS PTS
1 Halifax RLFC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Hunslet Hawks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 York City Knights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Batley Bulldogs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Featherstone Rovers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Sheffield Eagles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Dewsbury Rams 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Leigh Centurions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Toulouse Olympique XIII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Widnes Vikings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Barrow Raiders 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 TBC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P W L D PF PA DIFF BNS PTS
1 Halifax RLFC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Hunslet Hawks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 York City Knights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Batley Bulldogs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Featherstone Rovers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Sheffield Eagles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Dewsbury Rams 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Leigh Centurions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Toulouse Olympique XIII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Widnes Vikings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Barrow Raiders 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 TBC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"CENSORSHIP IS ALIVE AND WELL ON THIS FORUM"
#2
Posté 12 janvier 2011 - 09:23
QUOTE (Piggy's mate @ Jan 12 2011, 05:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Looking on the RFL web page for the 2011 league table in Championship it looks like there is space for A.N.Other! Same goes for CC1
P W L D PF PA DIFF BNS PTS
1 Halifax RLFC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Hunslet Hawks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 York City Knights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Batley Bulldogs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Featherstone Rovers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Sheffield Eagles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Dewsbury Rams 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Leigh Centurions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Toulouse Olympique XIII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Widnes Vikings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Barrow Raiders 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 TBC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P W L D PF PA DIFF BNS PTS
1 Halifax RLFC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Hunslet Hawks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 York City Knights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Batley Bulldogs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Featherstone Rovers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Sheffield Eagles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Dewsbury Rams 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Leigh Centurions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Toulouse Olympique XIII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Widnes Vikings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Barrow Raiders 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 TBC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gonna make a ###### of the fixtures! It's probably Wakefield!
#3
Posté 12 janvier 2011 - 10:48
not really one team free each week if theres eleven .So should be easy to sort out .Dont think it will be wakey as crusaders have been in admin.But who knows
everyone has a saviour even fev
#4
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 10:59
And why are Hunslet and York above Batley, and Fev only in 5th?
I suspect that this is a Wikileaked RFL plot.
Believe what you see, don't see what you believe.
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#5
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 11:25
I would be very worried if i was a wakefield fan, they promised to sort the ground situation out a long time ago in fact i'm sure it was part of the deal to gain/keep their superleague status? I know many will not like this but cas and wakefield should share a ground at a new location, but keeping 2 separate teams of course. The problem is the same council will not grant both teams a new stadium.
But they are both dead against the idea of a ground share as they cannot agree on a location for one and the bitter rivalry between the clubs, which i'm afraid could cost wakefield and/or castleford dear? The rugby league tends to do what the heck it wants so see a fall from grace for one of these!
But they are both dead against the idea of a ground share as they cannot agree on a location for one and the bitter rivalry between the clubs, which i'm afraid could cost wakefield and/or castleford dear? The rugby league tends to do what the heck it wants so see a fall from grace for one of these!
#6
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 12:32
wouldnt put anything past the RFL, but surely they cant change the make up of the divisions at this late stage can they?????
What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law
#7
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 12:45
QUOTE (buford t justice @ Jan 13 2011, 12:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
wouldnt put anything past the RFL, but surely they cant change the make up of the divisions at this late stage can they?????
Come now, BTJ, you should no better than to make statements like that! This is the RFL we're on about here!!!
#8
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 01:11
Probably a russian team with wakey goin into championship one
#9
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 01:39
They do have a habit of changing things at the last minute and also during the season as in introduction of SL which cost us promotion that season.. RFL ...###### up and brewery springs to mind..further down the chain its even worse in the RLC as make up of your league can change 12 hrs before kick off of the first game
Stoopid Cup Winner 2012
#10
Posté 14 janvier 2011 - 07:32
QUOTE (MOONEY @ Jan 13 2011, 11:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would be very worried if i was a wakefield fan, they promised to sort the ground situation out a long time ago in fact i'm sure it was part of the deal to gain/keep their superleague status? I know many will not like this but cas and wakefield should share a ground at a new location, but keeping 2 separate teams of course. The problem is the same council will not grant both teams a new stadium.
But they are both dead against the idea of a ground share as they cannot agree on a location for one and the bitter rivalry between the clubs, which i'm afraid could cost wakefield and/or castleford dear? The rugby league tends to do what the heck it wants so see a fall from grace for one of these!
But they are both dead against the idea of a ground share as they cannot agree on a location for one and the bitter rivalry between the clubs, which i'm afraid could cost wakefield and/or castleford dear? The rugby league tends to do what the heck it wants so see a fall from grace for one of these!
There`s a ground roughly halfway and there could be an ammalgamation Casterstofield Rogerts
When I want your opinion, I will remove the gaffer tape
0 utilisateur(s) en train de lire ce sujet
0 membre(s), 0 invité(s), 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s)













