Dane Manning
Started by
Mark B
, Jan 18 2011 06:28 PM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 18 January 2011 - 06:28 PM
Has today received a 2 match ban for the incident in the Dewsbury game .
Dane will miss the Cas friendly on Sunday along with the Leigh game , not too bad IMO .
Info provided by Paul Harrison .
Dane will miss the Cas friendly on Sunday along with the Leigh game , not too bad IMO .
Info provided by Paul Harrison .
#2
Posted 18 January 2011 - 08:30 PM
QUOTE (Mark B @ Jan 18 2011, 06:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Has today received a 2 match ban for the incident in the Dewsbury game .
Dane will miss the Cas friendly on Sunday along with the Leigh game , not too bad IMO .
Info provided by Paul Harrison .
Dane will miss the Cas friendly on Sunday along with the Leigh game , not too bad IMO .
Info provided by Paul Harrison .
Do friendlies count off your suspensions with the rfl? Or will the Cas game be another final?
#3
Posted 18 January 2011 - 08:48 PM
QUOTE (potato ram @ Jan 18 2011, 08:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Or will the Cas game be another final? 
Are you Townie/Eddie Rombo in disguise?
#4
Posted 18 January 2011 - 09:24 PM
He got it in the heavy woolen cup final , so dont see why the cas game wont count
#5
Posted 18 January 2011 - 09:56 PM
QUOTE (Batley Bob @ Jan 18 2011, 09:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
He got it in the heavy woolen cup final , so dont see why the cas game wont count
the Rams fans are only jealous as the only thing they will win this year is made of wood and is spoon shaped
"CENSORSHIP IS ALIVE AND WELL ON THIS FORUM"
#6
Posted 18 January 2011 - 09:57 PM
I'm pleased for the lad, he looks a great prospect.
Perhaps someone can explain to me?
The RFL website states under Mannings hearing:-
Range of Recommended Sanctions in relation to Charged Grade: 3-5 matches.
Can anyone enlighten me as to how he can possibly get a 2 match suspension? If he is guilty, then surely a 3 - 5 match ban is warranted. If he is not guilty or there is insufficient evidence, then why is he suspended?
It is over 3 weeks since the incident, yet the hearing has taken this long to be sorted out. Usually the disciplinary hearings are the week after the event, why wait this long? He would have been available for the NRC match had the hearing happened in the usual timely manner.
P.S. Good to hear Ernieone is on the mend! All the best.
Perhaps someone can explain to me?
The RFL website states under Mannings hearing:-
Range of Recommended Sanctions in relation to Charged Grade: 3-5 matches.
Can anyone enlighten me as to how he can possibly get a 2 match suspension? If he is guilty, then surely a 3 - 5 match ban is warranted. If he is not guilty or there is insufficient evidence, then why is he suspended?
It is over 3 weeks since the incident, yet the hearing has taken this long to be sorted out. Usually the disciplinary hearings are the week after the event, why wait this long? He would have been available for the NRC match had the hearing happened in the usual timely manner.
P.S. Good to hear Ernieone is on the mend! All the best.
Edited by Pride & Heritage, 18 January 2011 - 11:29 PM.
#7
Posted 18 January 2011 - 10:31 PM
maybe its down to Mr Nicholas?
#8
Posted 19 January 2011 - 12:33 PM
One player's misfortune is anothers good luck. We have sufficient strength in numbers and quality of players to bring someone in to wear the shirt in his absence. It will be their chance to show they are worthy of retaining it.
#9
Posted 19 January 2011 - 12:56 PM
QUOTE (Pride & Heritage @ Jan 18 2011, 09:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It is over 3 weeks since the incident, yet the hearing has taken this long to be sorted out. Usually the disciplinary hearings are the week after the event, why wait this long? He would have been available for the NRC match had the hearing happened in the usual timely manner.
RFL probably too busy doing important stuff like checking clubs' standing with HMRC, registering players, assisting SL teams in "development areas" etc to worry about disciplinary hearings.
Things may not improve when the season starts, 'cos then they'll doubtless be spending lots of time checking players' eligibility to play in Cup matches.
#10
Posted 19 January 2011 - 01:24 PM
QUOTE (Sir Jekyll Stocking @ Jan 19 2011, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
RFL probably too busy doing important stuff like checking clubs' standing with HMRC, registering players, assisting SL teams in "development areas" etc to worry about disciplinary hearings.
Things may not improve when the season starts, 'cos then they'll doubtless be spending lots of time checking players' eligibility to play in Cup matches.
Things may not improve when the season starts, 'cos then they'll doubtless be spending lots of time checking players' eligibility to play in Cup matches.
Thought you could only count one friendly in the case of bans, otherwise clubs could just arrange friendlies to rid players of bans. That was stopped
Sorry folks, no forecast comp this year
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













