My ball...
Started by
London Dick
, Feb 20 2011 04:02 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 20 February 2011 - 04:02 PM
...and I am not passing it. Whilst we won 60-6 we could have scored a lot more if players weren't so greedy and passed the ball to a team mate in a better position. I reckon there was at least 4 or 5 opportunities we bombed.
This might sound harsh considering the scoreline but our points difference isn't the best.
All things considered the game wasn't much more than a training exercise. Halifax will be a different story........
This might sound harsh considering the scoreline but our points difference isn't the best.
All things considered the game wasn't much more than a training exercise. Halifax will be a different story........
"If you want us to be the best and if you want us to beat the rest, a BISSA donation is what we need"
#2
Posted 20 February 2011 - 04:07 PM
Thunder never looked like scoring, but I agree disapointed that we seemed a little disjoined and relied on one man rugby. Fingers crossed for Fax next week.
"CENSORSHIP IS ALIVE AND WELL ON THIS FORUM"
#3
Posted 20 February 2011 - 05:46 PM
From my point of view I think that they tried too hard in the first half and that was thier undoing, things will get better.
#4
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:14 PM
Not entirely sure I agree. We were guilty of a bit too much dropped ball yet again, especially going downhill, but made lots of chances. For the second week running our defence looked pretty secure.
Interesting to note the results this week, especially over at Leigh. Perhaps our result against them was not too bad, or Sheffield are really going to struggle this year.
Interesting to note the results this week, especially over at Leigh. Perhaps our result against them was not too bad, or Sheffield are really going to struggle this year.
#5
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:14 PM
from my point of view the team played poorley with ball in hand poor decision making 1 man rugby 9we need to support each other) and not using team mates in better position (as others have said)
to many players wanted to get thier name on the score sheet, when instaed if they concentrated on playing as they should then the scoreboard would take care of itself
the combination of who is playing SO - SH - Hooker has not clicked IMO yet
to many players wanted to get thier name on the score sheet, when instaed if they concentrated on playing as they should then the scoreboard would take care of itself
the combination of who is playing SO - SH - Hooker has not clicked IMO yet
#6
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:30 PM
Gareth Moore got caught with the ball 3 times when a pass could of resulted in a score.
Gareth Moore took on the defensive line and didnt break it or send someone through it once.
Paul mennel burst through the line 3 times to give the Dogs good field position/ trys.......
Gareth Moore took on the defensive line and didnt break it or send someone through it once.
Paul mennel burst through the line 3 times to give the Dogs good field position/ trys.......
Karl cheers now move on the KEAR IS HERE!
#7
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:57 PM
Just look at Sheffields other results! I think they may struggle this season!Not entirely sure I agree. We were guilty of a bit too much dropped ball yet again, especially going downhill, but made lots of chances. For the second week running our defence looked pretty secure.
Interesting to note the results this week, especially over at Leigh. Perhaps our result against them was not too bad, or Sheffield are really going to struggle this year.
#8
Posted 20 February 2011 - 07:57 PM
I completely agree with you....and I am not passing it. Whilst we won 60-6 we could have scored a lot more if players weren't so greedy and passed the ball to a team mate in a better position. I reckon there was at least 4 or 5 opportunities we bombed.
This might sound harsh considering the scoreline but our points difference isn't the best.
All things considered the game wasn't much more than a training exercise. Halifax will be a different story........
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













