Town vs gateshead predictions
Started by
wonky
, Jun 09 2011 09:13 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 June 2011 - 09:13 AM
Surely we all agree that it should be a easy win for the boys. Town 72 thunder 10. It would be fantastic to keep them to zero for the 3rd time but I think gatesheads main objective will be to get over at least once. I don't see the point in resting any players unless they have knocks as we have a free week before we play haven.
the futures bright,the futures blue and white
#2
Posted 09 June 2011 - 11:01 AM
72 22 town
#3
Posted 10 June 2011 - 09:41 AM
I predict an easy win for Town then all the natives will start jumping up and down, AGAIN, shouting what a great team they've got and that they should be doing this every week and walking away with the league. Completely forgetting that when they play ANY team with any sort of substance they fall to pieces.
When will Town be a good team again?
Check my username.
When will Town be a good team again?
Check my username.
Will Town ever be any good?
Check my username
Check my username
#4
Posted 10 June 2011 - 10:26 AM
What a ###### comedian you are. God, honestly I can't stand up with laughing so hard. I suppose your a jam fan who is chuffed to bits with your battling performance against the mighty London skolars. Give it 2 weeks and you can crawl back under your stone after we make it 3 in a row at the wreck.
the futures bright,the futures blue and white
#5
Posted 10 June 2011 - 10:44 AM
I predict an easy win for Town then all the natives will start jumping up and down, AGAIN, shouting what a great team they've got and that they should be doing this every week and walking away with the league. Completely forgetting that when they play ANY team with any sort of substance they fall to pieces.
You mean just like the mighty Haven who struggled to beat London Skolars???
"i hate workington town fans with a passion they are the biggest cry babies in rl and boy do they get jealous easy"- Choccy 2012
"if it wernt for me they would have nowt at all to talk about" - Choccy 2012
"if it wernt for me they would have nowt at all to talk about" - Choccy 2012
#6
Posted 10 June 2011 - 11:38 AM
Town 68-14 Thunder.
#7
Posted 10 June 2011 - 05:37 PM
Although it should be a comfortable win one factor that may keep the score down a bit is it ls forecast awful weather on sunday with lots of wind and rain.
#8
Posted 10 June 2011 - 05:45 PM
We will win, pretty much a certainty. But these players owe us fans a good showing after the pathetic efforts in the last 2 home games. In fact they owe us an apology, though as usual we hear sod all from them. The same people keep turning up and paying good money and yet we hear nothing after abysmal efforts like that, and I`m sick of it.
#9
Posted 10 June 2011 - 06:23 PM
yes i agree they do owe us a good performance but as i say if the weather is going to beas bad as forecast it may keep the score down. hopefully it wont and we can add to our points difference significantly.
#10
Posted 11 June 2011 - 10:06 AM
Town side for Gateshead tomorrow is - carter,miller,low,mossop,Dawes,holt,kaighan,coward,peds,ginge,armistead,stack,olstrum. Subs from McKenna,Mcgoff,mcavoy,bamber and Marshall. Personally hope bamber gets the nod over Marshall. He deserves a run in the side. Shocked that king isn't on the bench for interchange with pedley. And whitehead rested, is that because of the stick he would of got for hus antics after the last game?
the futures bright,the futures blue and white
#11
Posted 27 June 2011 - 07:19 AM
CheckI predict an easy win for Town
Checkthen all the natives will start jumping up and down, AGAIN, shouting what a great team they've got and that they should be doing this every week and walking away with the league.
CheckCompletely forgetting that when they play ANY team with any sort of substance they fall to pieces.
CheckWhen will Town be a good team again?
Check my username.
4 out of 4 this prediction lark is easy
Will Town ever be any good?
Check my username
Check my username
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













