Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Garry Schofield


  • Please log in to reply
120 replies to this topic

#1 Johnoco

Johnoco

    Manager

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,171 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:01 PM

Just read on twitter that GS is challenging Morleys claim to 50 caps. Taking it up with the RFL apparently. Says lots of his caps weren't even proper Tests. Pretty insulting IMO.
Then wisdom says: cherish your days, worry only lets your time slip away
Push away the thief trying to steal your gift, the fighter is the one whose feet are swift.

#2 AndyMW

AndyMW

    Academy

  • Players
  • PipPip
  • 98 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:04 PM

Just read on twitter that GS is challenging Morleys claim to 50 caps. Taking it up with the RFL apparently. Says lots of his caps weren't even proper Tests. Pretty insulting IMO.

Got no time for Schofield, hope they've got Morley's caps correct.

#3 Steve May

Steve May

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9,556 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:06 PM

I suppose it depends on how you regard England caps before the demise of GB. Outside of World Cups nobody at the time really considered them to be full caps in the way that playing for GB was. It was effectively equivalent to the England Knights team.
If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.

#4 marklaspalmas

marklaspalmas

    Manager

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,567 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:09 PM

Not got much time for Schofield, and I haven't heard exactly what he said.

However, this does highlight a problem for stattoes.

While GB was in operation there were a fair few England internationals which were essentially 'Knights' teams, ie fringe players and youngsters.

It's not comparing like with like.

Nowadays, an England cap is the maximum you can aspire to. In the late 90s and early 00s the federation shield and european cup England teams were clearly not full strength.

This is no reflection on Morley BTW. I imagine most if not all of his apps were in full-strength sides.

At least we knew where we stood with GB caps.

#5 Steve May

Steve May

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9,556 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:14 PM

Just had a look at the England RL website and they have a neat list of all the players. It's quite interesting.

I suspect that Schoey is upset because he's always been known for having 46 caps, which is the joint British record with Mick Sullivan (who also, BTW, has 3 England caps, which would put him on 49).

But he also has 3 England caps that never get counted. That would take him to 49.

Morley, however, gets his England caps counted. If his were counted the same way as Garry Schofield's then he'd only have 30 caps.

I can see where Schoey is coming from. It needs to be one way or the other.

My take on is that the England matches should be classified as full internationals according to whether they were the top level of internationals at the time.

Edited by Steve May, 17 November 2011 - 09:16 PM.

If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.

#6 Padge

Padge

    Manager

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,837 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:22 PM

It depends on what he's whinging about, players get caps for representing counties and countries, an international cap is a cap be it for England or for GB, if its a test cap then the games played have to be recognized as a test.

So has Morley got 50 caps, 50 international caps or 50 Test caps.

Schofields an arze anyway.
Visit my photography site www.padge.smugmug.com

Radio 5 Live: Saturday 14 April 2007
Dave Whelan "In Wigan rugby will always be king"

#7 1976PMJwires

1976PMJwires

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8,632 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:26 PM

Sad when an old retired man can't praise a fellow professional.

#8 marklaspalmas

marklaspalmas

    Manager

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,567 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:30 PM

Can we find out what he's actually said then before we go much further?

#9 Derwent

Derwent

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7,022 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:36 PM

Can we find out what he's actually said then before we go much further?


People love to hate him and don't miss an opportunity to have a go, but I think he makes some perfectly fair and valid points actually....

http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/news/15314/7313648/Dispute-over-Morley-record
Super Clarty Git Amang It Dip Fer Dippin Owt In

#10 Griff9of13

Griff9of13

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,205 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:39 PM

Resentful, bitter and petty.

He was banging on about this a week or two ago on Twitter. If he has taken it further then it is pretty sad.
"it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it."

#11 Padge

Padge

    Manager

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,837 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:43 PM

People love to hate him and don't miss an opportunity to have a go, but I think he makes some perfectly fair and valid points actually....

http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/news/15314/7313648/Dispute-over-Morley-record


He's been sulking about caps ever since he fantasised that Mo deliberatly put the blocks on him beating Sullivans record.

Scholfield is an arze.
Visit my photography site www.padge.smugmug.com

Radio 5 Live: Saturday 14 April 2007
Dave Whelan "In Wigan rugby will always be king"

#12 l'angelo mysterioso

l'angelo mysterioso

    Chairman

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 37,571 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:47 PM

Not got much time for Schofield, and I haven't heard exactly what he said.

However, this does highlight a problem for stattoes.

While GB was in operation there were a fair few England internationals which were essentially 'Knights' teams, ie fringe players and youngsters.

It's not comparing like with like.

Nowadays, an England cap is the maximum you can aspire to. In the late 90s and early 00s the federation shield and european cup England teams were clearly not full strength.

This is no reflection on Morley BTW. I imagine most if not all of his apps were in full-strength sides.

At least we knew where we stood with GB caps.


I agree

but my beef is with Schofield's lack of dignity.

If he had a query about the subject he could have gone about it quietly in the right quarters.

I hope Morley has a stormer on Saturday even more so now.
there are those among us
who think that life is but a joke

#13 bobbruce

bobbruce

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,415 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:47 PM

What we need to find out is if any of Morleys caps where for a sort of England A if not there's no problem it's not down to him what the RFL decide to call the national side

#14 Derwent

Derwent

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7,022 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:50 PM

He's been sulking about caps ever since he fantasised that Mo deliberatly put the blocks on him beating Sullivans record.

Scholfield is an arze.


That's as maybe, but it doesn't mean he hasn't got a point.

All of his caps were in proper test matches - and don't forget only GB, Australia, NZ and France had test status during his playing days.

Morley has England caps for games against such opposition as South Africa, Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, Wales etc. Hardly a fair comparison.

Its a fact that modern day players are going to end up with more caps than previous generations because the volume of internationals is so much greater now. It depends on whether you think there should be a distinction made between test caps and international caps.
Super Clarty Git Amang It Dip Fer Dippin Owt In

#15 TheDuke

TheDuke

    Physio

  • Coach
  • PipPipPip
  • 891 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:50 PM

lock em in a room to talk it over

#16 Derwent

Derwent

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7,022 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:51 PM

I agree

but my beef is with Schofield's lack of dignity.

If he had a query about the subject he could have gone about it quietly in the right quarters.

I hope Morley has a stormer on Saturday even more so now.


Agreed, he has gone about it in the wrong way, no doubt about that.
Super Clarty Git Amang It Dip Fer Dippin Owt In

#17 marklaspalmas

marklaspalmas

    Manager

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,567 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:08 PM

I agree

but my beef is with Schofield's lack of dignity.

If he had a query about the subject he could have gone about it quietly in the right quarters.

I hope Morley has a stormer on Saturday even more so now.


Sure. GS comes across as petty & bitter and is a bit insulting to AM who rightly deserves his day in the sun.

GS is probably technically right though and the whole thing needs looking at (another day).

#18 getdownmonkeyman

getdownmonkeyman

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,499 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:13 PM

Crass oaf.

#19 fieldofclothofgold

fieldofclothofgold

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,647 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:36 PM

Even if Schoefield is right about this..He is belittling himself by bringing it up.Surely all the stats people will have questioned this sooner or later.
but you and I weve been through that and this is not our fate.
So let us so let us not talk falsely now.
The hour is getting late
FROM 2004,TO DO WHAT THIS CLUB HAS DONE,IF THATS NOT GREATNESSTHEN i DONT KNOW WHAT IS.

JAMIE PEACOCK

#20 Marauder

Marauder

    Manager

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,915 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 11:07 PM

Even if Schoefield is right about this..He is belittling himself by bringing it up.Surely all the stats people will have questioned this sooner or later.

Would they? Since Super League started lots of rugby leagues past has been airbrushed away or pushed to one side.
Carlsberg don't do Soldiers, but if they did, they would probably be Brits.<div align='center'></div>

http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users