Bradford bust!?
#1
Posted 27 March 2012 - 08:48 AM
#2
Posted 27 March 2012 - 09:39 AM
No sympathy at all. And the real kick between the legs is that Halifax had a viable and workable plan for SL that would of been more in line of their budget than what Bradford overspent with.
Edited by oldhamer, 27 March 2012 - 09:40 AM.
#3
Posted 27 March 2012 - 11:58 AM
Demegraphics of Bradford has changed...asians ain't gonna pay to watch it.
Plus an outdated ground, needs to be like Warrington somewhere
Plus big contract overseas players no doubt
Welcome to Championship One.
#4
Posted 27 March 2012 - 12:56 PM
How London were allowed to reform and stay in the competition was bad enough, followed by the whole Celtic farce shows that once you are in the top flight, the SL will look after you come what may.
If the do step and help, it will be another kick in the whatsits for teams in the Championship and below. And they wonder why people are staying away from RL beneath the SL? The whole game is run by cretins, and having listened constantly to what the RFL are trying preach at various meetings, nothing will convince me otherwise.
To play devils advocate, I would love someone to have the balls to say to all SL clubs at the end of the season is that all monies paid by SL to the clubs each year is being suspended for one year only, to allow clubs to stand on their won two feet and not rely on a huge cash hand out. Yes, it would cause up roar. Yes, it would enforce a reduction on salaries paid at the top (at a level clubs now could afford), and change cultures that have been allowed to grow for the detriment of the game. There would be an outcry that the top talent would go elsewhere, where? The NRL? I don't think so for the majority, maybe 3/4 at tops.
The whole game is being run by people who are looking after their own interests and creating a culture of 'YES' men, that has to change.
#5
Posted 27 March 2012 - 01:24 PM
I already feel bitter about the way our club and others below SL have been treated by the RFL.
It'll be interesting to see how this is handled
Will they be bailed out by the RFL?
Will they be relegated? Will another team take their place?
It's no wonder theres a lot of apathy among the heartland clubs below SL
#6
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:15 PM
#7
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:25 PM
#8
Posted 27 March 2012 - 03:07 PM
Yep, I am sure that Bradford will be dealt with like they handled Doncaster and Barrow etc. To go into administration is relegation material irrespective if it's not a relegation season otherwise it's simple. Overspend in years 1 and 2, and when the franchises are up for renewal and relegation could happen in Year 3, run back into the black and keep your place - easy peasy. A 6 point deduction is ###### all for Bradford, as it means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things. The RFL and SL should take a leaf out of the NRL and grow a set of gonads and deal with them severly. But we all know that will not happen.
Bradford should take the punishment end of and not morph into something London did years ago.
#9
Posted 27 March 2012 - 03:27 PM
#10
Posted 27 March 2012 - 03:33 PM
Edited by oldhamer, 27 March 2012 - 03:33 PM.
#11
Posted 27 March 2012 - 03:37 PM
How many teams have the NRL relegated?The RFL and SL should take a leaf out of the NRL and grow a set of gonads and deal with them severly. But we all know that will not happen.
#12
Posted 27 March 2012 - 03:43 PM
The NRL showed Melbourne how serious it was to breach the cap, and dealt with them in a manner that the SL would never do over here. They didn't give a flying fig of what the rugby world felt on the issue, they repremanded them to a level that would warn others. And well done to them. However, if there was a three tier system place in Australia, and had a P&R franchise system similar to ours, then I am sure that a club going to adminsitration by bascially overpsending, would be dealt with in a just a severe way.
And they should of relegated London years ago when they went bang and reformed under another name.
Edited by oldhamer, 27 March 2012 - 03:45 PM.
#13
Posted 27 March 2012 - 07:09 PM
Under what rule? I'll give you a hint... there wasn't one. No one had thought a club would go bust and restart under a new company name in the way they did. The rules were not in place to cover the scenario (they are now, due to Broncos leading the way...).And they should of relegated London years ago when they went bang and reformed under another name.
Try hitting a pro-sports club with a retrospective rule change and see how you get on.
#14
Posted 27 March 2012 - 08:52 PM
#15
Posted 28 March 2012 - 12:06 AM
If they go bust they will get a 6 point (3 game) deduction, the same as anyone else. As SL has no relegation they can finish bottom.
And that is quite simply pathetic. Because finishing bottom doesn't matter. In fact it is regarded as being better than finishing top of the championship. No wonder we are losing interest in the game.
#16
Posted 28 March 2012 - 11:05 AM
. The RFL and SL should take a leaf out of the NRL and grow a set of gonads and deal with them severly. But we all know that will not happen.
what like how the NRL are dealing with the gold coast titans??...who are $30million in debt...yet the NRL have allowed them to sign dave taylor on a $1.8m contract and it's looking likely that they've signed cooper cronk on a massive $3m+ contract too......
sure they deal with the salary cap issues severly.........but the £1m bradford owe is chicken feed compare to how much in debt most NRL clubs are.....and thats not being dealt with at all
OLDHAM RLFC
the 8TH most successful team in british RL
#17
Posted 28 March 2012 - 12:50 PM
When London and Widnes went bang and reformed under a different operating name was similar to when Oldham Bears went under. Oldham had to start in the lowest division possible, London and Widnes were allowed to continue in the same division. And it will be no different to what will happen to Bradford and that is why the game is a complete and utter joke!
#18
Posted 28 March 2012 - 03:51 PM
#19
Posted 28 March 2012 - 06:02 PM
But they weren't similar. Oldham went bust (that's the same) but how long was it before a new company was formed? If we had reformed almost instantly we could of been the test case like London was...we didn't, so weren't.When London and Widnes went bang and reformed under a different operating name was similar to when Oldham Bears went under. Oldham had to start in the lowest division possible, London and Widnes were allowed to continue in the same division.
#20
Posted 29 March 2012 - 09:10 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













