What does the Grand Prix Ent. deal means for the sport in the USA
#1
Posted 17 May 2012 - 02:46 PM
May 18th, 2012
By Daniel Andruczyk
Last weeks news of the acquisition of the American national Rugby League by Grand Prix Entertainment group has been one of the big pieces of news to come out of the United States since they qualified for the Rugby league World Cup in 2013 last autumn in Chester, New Jersey. For years we all have stood on the sidelines waiting in anticipation, every time we heard an announcement that there was going to be a professional competition in the United States and that the competition will grow and become professionalized. And for so many years we have been disappointed. To the point where many of the team in early 2011 were so frustrated by this that they broke away to form their own competition.
Read more...
_______________________________
Read RLIS' blog
RLIS on facebook
Follow RLIS on twitter
#2
Posted 17 May 2012 - 03:11 PM
Also, the whole thing is rugby, rugby, rugby. As if there's one sport with a couple of different formats, like cricket.
I don't trust David Niu and I trust this bloke even less. Any serious sport would have seen the International body intervene by now (and with Italy too) but then since when was RL a serious sport?
Jean Roque, Calendrier-revue du Racing-Club Albigeois, 1958-1959
#3
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:46 PM
_______________________________
Read RLIS' blog
RLIS on facebook
Follow RLIS on twitter
#4
Posted 17 May 2012 - 09:13 PM
WTF
#5
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:32 AM
'a bitchen sport'???
WTF
Actually I think this guy meant bischen which is small in German
#6
Posted 18 May 2012 - 09:14 AM
'a bitchen sport'???
WTF
Ah! that makes sense.Actually I think this guy meant bischen which is small in German
I just thought he liked the sport and thought it was "bitchin"
#7
Posted 19 May 2012 - 05:10 PM
#8
Posted 19 May 2012 - 07:31 PM
What if the Americans preferred our form of rugby?Far too much talk about Union in that for my liking. The 2 sports should be kept far apart, for if nothing else it will simply confuse the Americans if League is simply presented as another form of 'Rugby'. The only ones who'll benefit from that are Union. As nadera78 said, if only we had an international governing body that actually had some authority...
#9
Posted 20 May 2012 - 08:22 AM
What if the Americans preferred our form of rugby?
Seeing as the usual American idea of rugby is a load of frat lads on the pi$$ they wouldn't even bother looking past the word 'rugby'
#10
Posted 20 May 2012 - 12:43 PM
What if the Americans preferred our form of rugby?
Seeing as the usual American idea of rugby is a load of frat lads on the pi$$ they wouldn't even bother looking past the word 'rugby'
Pretty much what DP says. By presenting our game as simply a different form of 'Rugby' you're immediately playing to any pre-conceived notions the Americans have of what 'Rugby' is. There are more than enough people in this country, where Union and League have been seperate sports for 117 years, who don't know the difference between the two sports. Starting the game in a new territory by presenting it simply as a different form of another sport is, to my mind at least, suicidal.
#11
Posted 20 May 2012 - 03:53 PM
#12
Posted 20 May 2012 - 08:23 PM
_______________________________
Read RLIS' blog
RLIS on facebook
Follow RLIS on twitter
#13
Posted 21 May 2012 - 03:12 PM
#14
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:48 PM
When money like that gets involved, who knows.
_______________________________
Read RLIS' blog
RLIS on facebook
Follow RLIS on twitter
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: USA, AMNRL, USARL, Grand Prix Entertainment, RLIS
Rugby League & General Topics →
The International Rugby League Forum →
USARL Players eligible for TomahawksStarted by druzik , 22 May 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













