38 replies to this topic

[Cutsyke Raiders]

Answer :
They both had try scorers at the weekend that are currently registered Cutsyke Raiders players.

Is this the start of a mutual pact between the clubs?

No de-registration, no transfer, no kiss my a*se...

I wondered why there are no teamsheets on the tier 4 site RFL site, all has been revealed

[LONGMAN]

Who are the registered Cutsyke players please?

[Marauder]

Who are the registered Cutsyke players please?

More to the point who are the Illegal/legal (who knows with the RFL) players and why arn't the NCL committee stepping in? Thats right the NCL3 is not the NCL when really to to the rest of the world it's portrayed as the NCL.

Well if I opened a burger shop and called it McDonald's I would soon be closed down.

Question to the COMMITTEE; If these clubs can not operate without Pro players now how do you expect them to survive without them in 2013 or has the deal been done without a democratic vote? Is the COMMITTEE going to recommend that the NCL clubs accept Pro players on the back of the NCL3 being the successful pilot scheme and also another selling point would be player will filter down into the `A` teams ensuring fixtures get fulfilled.

To me this system the RFL want in place is only geared up for the top end of the game and there is no safety valve in place to protect the social/pub team which has been the backbone of the game for over 35 years, the have get the have nots get sod all.

Edited by Marauder, 22 May 2012 - 08:15 AM.

[bowes]

What would you call NCL3?

How many times do I need to say it's a one year deal and then the division is scrapped and full criteria apply.

[Jasper]

Answer :
They both had try scorers at the weekend that are currently registered Cutsyke Raiders players.

Is this the start of a mutual pact between the clubs?

No de-registration, no transfer, no kiss my a*se...

I wondered why there are no teamsheets on the tier 4 site RFL site, all has been revealed

Cutsyke, excuse my ignorance, late comer to the greatest game, but are you saying that there were illegal players in the game against St Albans on Saturday. I thought there was some sort of dual-registration type thing in place for this season. Just wondering as I follow amateur rl in and around Hertfordshire.

[Marauder]

What would you call NCL3?

How many times do I need to say it's a one year deal and then the division is scrapped and full criteria apply.

A one year deal with who? because I'm sure that the NCL clubs never voted on it and the NCL is a democratic organisation or is it.

[bowes]

A one year deal with who? because I'm sure that the NCL clubs never voted on it and the NCL is a democratic organisation or is it.

What else would you call it? The NCL agreed to let it use that name and advertise it on their website on condition there wasn't promotion and relegation and they didn't have voting rights at the NCL. Hence why there's no vote as it's not a full part of the league. The league is getting scrapped at the end of the season, so it doesn't really matter, how many times do I need to say that. 7 out of 10 clubs in it meet NCL criteria anyway.

[Marauder]

What else would you call it? The NCL agreed to let it use that name and advertise it on their website on condition there wasn't promotion and relegation and they didn't have voting rights at the NCL. Hence why there's no vote as it's not a full part of the league. The league is getting scrapped at the end of the season, so it doesn't really matter, how many times do I need to say that. 7 out of 10 clubs in it meet NCL criteria anyway.

Why not the RLCN for one more year or is it all part of the process of if it's in front of you as NCL3 long enough it will be accepted and meeting (Including playing standard) the criteria and being voted in are two different stories, many clubs have attempted to join the NCL in the past and have not been allowed to join because the VOTE went against them.

If my club was part of the NCL and the committee where doing deals with the RFL without a vote I would be having bad suspicions especially when some of the same get a place granted on the community board of which it's members seem to have been elected by the RFL.

[bowes]

Why not the RLCN for one more year or is it all part of the process of if it's in front of you as NCL3 long enough it will be accepted and meeting (Including playing standard) the criteria and being voted in are two different stories, many clubs have attempted to join the NCL in the past and have not been allowed to join because the VOTE went against them.

If my club was part of the NCL and the committee where doing deals with the RFL without a vote I would be having bad suspicions especially when some of the same get a place granted on the community board of which it's members seem to have been elected by the RFL.

How can you be the national division of a non existant league?

The RFL and NCL have no intention of Conference 3 being an extra division of the NCL so you can give up that particular conspiracy. 3 Conference 3 clubs have been recommended for inclusion next year and at least 1 more has applied.

Not everyone is filled with spite and hatred towards other clubs and leagues you know.

[chuffer]

A one year deal with who? because I'm sure that the NCL clubs never voted on it and the NCL is a democratic organisation or is it.

oh change the record you dullard

[Marauder]

oh change the record you dullard

Why because I'm right "Baaaaaa"

[bowes]

Why because I'm right "Baaaaaa"

Just because a league is democratic doesn't mean clubs should have a vote on what other leagues call themselves or where a decision would kill another league needlessly.

The Conference North next year will subject to the clubs vote have 4 divisions where EVERY club meets minimum criteria and will be run by the NCL.

There will probably be a Conference South administered separately. NCL clubs won't get a vote to kill all southern clubs as you may wish.

Conference 3 as is won't exist.

[Marauder]

Just because a league is democratic doesn't mean clubs should have a vote on what other leagues call themselves or where a decision would kill another league needlessly.

The Conference North next year will subject to the clubs vote have 4 divisions where EVERY club meets minimum criteria and will be run by the NCL.

There will probably be a Conference South administered separately. NCL clubs won't get a vote to kill all southern clubs as you may wish.

Conference 3 as is won't exist.

I don't wish for any club to be killed, I believe that the RFL should respect the NCL constitution until they decide who, when and if they require change and I still can not see why the RLCN could not have stopped the RLCN for one more season or until the NCL clubs decided on whether or not they want a NCL3 made up of teams who do not all fulfil the criteria completely.

Edited by Marauder, 22 May 2012 - 04:00 PM.

[bowes]

I don't wish for any club to be killed, I believe that the RFL should respect the NCL constitution until they decide who, when and if they require change and I still can not see why the RLCN could not have stopped the RLCN for one more season or until the NCL clubs decided on whether or not they want a NCL3 made up of teams who do not all fulfil the criteria completely.

RLCN would have been a silly name without there being a RLC and would be confusing. So is NCL 3 to be fair but difficult.

The NCL have wanted a division 3 for a ling time and when they get a proper one next year all clubs will meet criteria.

The NCL constitution hasn't been changed.

Clubs would be killed if people took your attitude of extreme aversion to any minor change.

[Marauder]

RLCN would have been a silly name without there being a RLC and would be confusing. So is NCL 3 to be fair but difficult.

The NCL have wanted a division 3 for a ling time and when they get a proper one next year all clubs will meet criteria.

The NCL constitution hasn't been changed.

Clubs would be killed if people took your attitude of extreme aversion to any minor change.

Where did you hear that the NCL have wanted a third division for a Long time? I have many friends who play and coach in it and not one have ever mentioned a third division.

Constitution has not been changed so your just surmising

More clubs will be lost due to the dual registration and I'm not against change if it's done correctly (vote)

[bowes]

Where did you hear that the NCL have wanted a third division for a Long time? I have many friends who play and coach in it and not one have ever mentioned a third division.

Constitution has not been changed so your just surmising

More clubs will be lost due to the dual registration and I'm not against change if it's done correctly (vote)

The committee have had an extra division an aim before summer was ever dreamed of.

Edited by bowes, 22 May 2012 - 06:06 PM.

[Cutsyke Raiders]

Cutsyke, excuse my ignorance, late comer to the greatest game, but are you saying that there were illegal players in the game against St Albans on Saturday. I thought there was some sort of dual-registration type thing in place for this season. Just wondering as I follow amateur rl in and around Hertfordshire.

No, not illegal Jasper. I'm saying the niceties of form filling and checking databases have not been adhered to...
Looks like triple registration to me, i must have missed that email....

[PhilCarrington]

RLCN would have been a silly name without there being a RLC and would be confusing. So is NCL 3 to be fair but difficult.

No more silly than the old RLC below Conference 3 now being referred to in the Rugby League press as Tier 4 leagues (except those in the Midlands, which have a proper title). No other comp is called by its tier status.

[casyorkie]

No, not illegal Jasper. I'm saying the niceties of form filling and checking databases have not been adhered to...
Looks like triple registration to me, i must have missed that email....

Are you going to name the players for these clubs and while triple registration which 3 clubs are they registered for

[Offical Marlin]

Answer :
They both had try scorers at the weekend that are currently registered Cutsyke Raiders players.

Is this the start of a mutual pact between the clubs?

No de-registration, no transfer, no kiss my a*se...

I wondered why there are no teamsheets on the tier 4 site RFL site, all has been revealed

Milford Marlins would like to know the Milford player who scored was it the first team or reserve grade player.

Only 2 players who scored in those teams on Saturday has not been at Milford for numerous years, one has just started playing amateur rugby and the other has left a professional club to join us

All players signed on for Milford have Milford as there primary club and are all registered correctly with the respective leagues.

Its intresting that you choose to ignore the second post asking you to name the players concerned .