the bradford bulls
Started by
blackhawk
, Jul 11 2012 06:25 AM
32 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 11 July 2012 - 06:25 AM
the bulls have been granted a stay of execution till the 27 th of july .they have been given all the time to sort the mess out,if the fail they go into liquidation,and are no more,but u can bet the RFL will step in at some point to save them from going under,but i hope not in super league ,the shouldnt be treat any differently from clubs in similar postions points deduction,firstly for going into administration,if the do close business and come back as a new company then surely they have to be dropped to a lower division and like anybody else start in a lower division and work themselves back,just my opinion ,what do people think ?.
#2
Posted 11 July 2012 - 08:10 AM
They'll be allowed to continue in SL come what may. Anyone who believes otherwise is living in dreamworld.
What I'm looking for is someone who can contribute to what England has given to the world: culture, sophistication, genius. A little bit more than an 'ot dog, know what I mean?
#3
Posted 11 July 2012 - 09:07 AM
It seems that the only persons interested in making an offer, a group of Asian business men - allegedly some with restaurants in the city, are only prepared to continue their interest if the Bulls are guaranteed a SL place till the end of the current franchise period. So, in all honesty, can you see the RFL allowing them to go out of business if by agreeing to this they will continue?
#4
Posted 11 July 2012 - 12:37 PM
One word "CORRUPT"
#5
Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:12 PM
Agree Blackbeard, they should be kicked out total corrupt, what sort of message does this send to the rest of the rugby league....
Teams like our selfs must be thinking why bother, the RL should get some balls and do what the Scottish FA have done with Rangers....
If they now get to stay in SL the whole franchise becomes a joke and rugby league a laughing stock
Teams like our selfs must be thinking why bother, the RL should get some balls and do what the Scottish FA have done with Rangers....
If they now get to stay in SL the whole franchise becomes a joke and rugby league a laughing stock
#6
Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:19 PM
were already a laughing stock and have been for a long time just hope nigel woods doesnt get the top job at the R.F.L cos all i can see with him in charge will be chaotic.Agree Blackbeard, they should be kicked out total corrupt, what sort of message does this send to the rest of the rugby league....
Teams like our selfs must be thinking why bother, the RL should get some balls and do what the Scottish FA have done with Rangers....
If they now get to stay in SL the whole franchise becomes a joke and rugby league a laughing stock
#7
Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:20 PM
One word "CORRUPT"
#8
Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:20 PM
nail on head rik
#9
Posted 12 July 2012 - 06:21 AM
sounds like a bit of blackmail to meIt seems that the only persons interested in making an offer, a group of Asian business men - allegedly some with restaurants in the city, are only prepared to continue their interest if the Bulls are guaranteed a SL place till the end of the current franchise period. So, in all honesty, can you see the RFL allowing them to go out of business if by agreeing to this they will continue?
#10
Posted 13 July 2012 - 02:54 PM
I've said this on a few of the other forums, but the actual Super League clubs instaed of the RFL will have more of a say on whether they stay or not as they will be the biggest part of the vote. No Super League side in their right mind would vote to kick Bradford out as who the hell is going to replace them with the same size of support? They all need the Bradford match every season to bring in some coin. Not one of the Championship sides have a following like they so how would they replace them?
SIGNATURE
#11
Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:20 PM
Absolutely agree ... Like Turkeys voting for Christmas. It is a shame that the game has evolved into a corrupt administration. Tormentor in chief of Bradford Bulls - the former chairman who saw this coming years ago.
How do Halifax feel when both Bradford and Hudds were going into their patch selling Super League season tickets at £50??
It's appalling and time that Nigel and Ralph did the decent thing and followed Richard out of the game.
How do Halifax feel when both Bradford and Hudds were going into their patch selling Super League season tickets at £50??
It's appalling and time that Nigel and Ralph did the decent thing and followed Richard out of the game.
#12
Posted 14 July 2012 - 04:18 AM
couldnt argue with any of that mate,make em start as a newco and not be blackmailed by anyone , stick to laws and bye laws of the whole of rugby league if they can man up and enforce the said lawsAbsolutely agree ... Like Turkeys voting for Christmas. It is a shame that the game has evolved into a corrupt administration. Tormentor in chief of Bradford Bulls - the former chairman who saw this coming years ago.
How do Halifax feel when both Bradford and Hudds were going into their patch selling Super League season tickets at £50??
It's appalling and time that Nigel and Ralph did the decent thing and followed Richard out of the game.
#13
Posted 14 July 2012 - 12:13 PM
Bradford Aagrah-Mumtaz-Pakeezah Bulls from what I hear !!
#14
Posted 15 July 2012 - 07:33 AM
after listening to the post match comments on the red button yesterday ,and what the director of licensing had to say bradford are a long way off thinking that thier licence is safe even if this asian consortium do buy in to bradford,the spokesperson said they may well have to start in championship 1 seems like the rfl wont be blackmailed and rightly so,he did say that the RFL would pay the players wages for the rest of the season,but after that they stand alone,also some super league clubs would not be backing bradford to stay in super league after the buy out, sure would be interesting to which clubs are not backing bradford in any way shape or form.
#15
Posted 16 July 2012 - 09:05 PM
seems the rhinos are backing bradfordafter listening to the post match comments on the red button yesterday ,and what the director of licensing had to say bradford are a long way off thinking that thier licence is safe even if this asian consortium do buy in to bradford,the spokesperson said they may well have to start in championship 1 seems like the rfl wont be blackmailed and rightly so,he did say that the RFL would pay the players wages for the rest of the season,but after that they stand alone,also some super league clubs would not be backing bradford to stay in super league after the buy out, sure would be interesting to which clubs are not backing bradford in any way shape or form.
they are donating all the tickes sales from bulls fans back
When I want your opinion, I will remove the gaffer tape
#16
Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:03 AM
it's a pity the rhinos couldn't be so benevolent to the hawks to keep the leeds rivalry going. it makes me sick to see all this wailing and wringing of hands over the bulls. why can't the rfl look at whats happening below superleague for gods sake.seems the rhinos are backing bradford
they are donating all the tickes sales from bulls fans back
#17
Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:18 AM
it's a pity the rhinos couldn't be so benevolent to the hawks to keep the leeds rivalry going. it makes me sick to see all this wailing and wringing of hands over the bulls. why can't the rfl look at whats happening below superleague for gods sake.
I may be wrong, and no doubt someone will tell me if I am, but I have always understood that the Rhinos allow Hunslet to keep all the gate receipts from the pre-season Lazenby cup match
#18
Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:27 AM
As far as I know they do.
Leeds Rhinos,STILL the only Grand Final winning club NOT to have cheated the salary cap.WCC Champions 2012.
#19
Posted 17 July 2012 - 09:41 PM
Not to the tune of £50000 like they are giving back to BradfordI may be wrong, and no doubt someone will tell me if I am, but I have always understood that the Rhinos allow Hunslet to keep all the gate receipts from the pre-season Lazenby cup match
When I want your opinion, I will remove the gaffer tape
#20
Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:05 PM
i'd be very surprised if it was even half that much that bradford get.Not to the tune of £50000 like they are giving back to Bradford
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














