team for thunder
Started by
scott
, Jul 27 2012 10:55 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 July 2012 - 10:55 PM
i would drop i few.
carter
miller
mossop
olstrum (or see if patrick will come back for a least a few games)
s.dawes
forber
bamber
tutty
matty
robinson
phillips
stack
petersen
king
shackley
thackray
newton
carter
miller
mossop
olstrum (or see if patrick will come back for a least a few games)
s.dawes
forber
bamber
tutty
matty
robinson
phillips
stack
petersen
king
shackley
thackray
newton
#2
Posted 28 July 2012 - 06:56 AM
King and Tutty?? If they had been playing regular rugby then yea fair enough but i cant see them being anywhere near fit enough.
Olstrum has been brilliant all season and after one bad game your wanting him dropped??
1.Carter
2.Miller
3.Mossop
4.Olstrum
5.Calderwood
6.Forber
7.Bamber
8.Whitehead
9.Mattinson
10.Coward
11.Phillips
12.Stack
13.Peterson
14.Lupton
15.Thackray
16.Shackley
17.Gaskell
Everyone needs to chill out and stop panacing...i hope the players arnt feeling the same way as some of you!
We are an awesome team this year,one bad performance and you all start crying. this is the part of the year were the players need us more than ever before so come on!!!
Up the Town!!!
Olstrum has been brilliant all season and after one bad game your wanting him dropped??
1.Carter
2.Miller
3.Mossop
4.Olstrum
5.Calderwood
6.Forber
7.Bamber
8.Whitehead
9.Mattinson
10.Coward
11.Phillips
12.Stack
13.Peterson
14.Lupton
15.Thackray
16.Shackley
17.Gaskell
Everyone needs to chill out and stop panacing...i hope the players arnt feeling the same way as some of you!
We are an awesome team this year,one bad performance and you all start crying. this is the part of the year were the players need us more than ever before so come on!!!
Up the Town!!!
#3
Posted 28 July 2012 - 08:05 AM
cato89 i dont think olstrum needs dropped i was just saying we should try get patrick back for a game or 2. i think we should drop lupton because my opinion is i think he has not shown us his super league class yet
#4
Posted 28 July 2012 - 10:10 AM
Don't be daft you lot, Lupton needs to play himself back to top form, needs a bit more confidence after his car crash injury, he will not get that sitting on the bench. a game against Gateshead (No disrespect to them ) might just give him that bit extra space and confidence.
#5
Posted 28 July 2012 - 10:20 AM
Don't be daft you lot, Lupton needs to play himself back to top form, needs a bit more confidence after his car crash injury, he will not get that sitting on the bench. a game against Gateshead (No disrespect to them ) might just give him that bit extra space and confidence.
If it was Bamber playing as badly as Lupton has been you wouldnt think twice about wanting him dropped. Lupton hasnt been anywhere near as good as we had hoped and the crash was ages ago so I dont think you can use that as an excuse.
#6
Posted 28 July 2012 - 10:26 AM
1.carter
2.miller
3.mossop
4.Dawes
5.calderwood
6.Forber
7.bamber
8.shacks
9.matty
10.coward
11.Phillips
12.stack
13.olstrum
14.thacks
15.lupton
16.whitehead
17.cotter (petersen if available)
2.miller
3.mossop
4.Dawes
5.calderwood
6.Forber
7.bamber
8.shacks
9.matty
10.coward
11.Phillips
12.stack
13.olstrum
14.thacks
15.lupton
16.whitehead
17.cotter (petersen if available)
the futures bright,the futures blue and white
#7
Posted 28 July 2012 - 11:58 AM
weve got to stick with the players , you can get into a right mess turning everything upside down , and give
them the chance to put right one off night.I think weve got to stick with Lupton now , and bring Dawes in .
I dont like square pegs in round holes and Olstrum at 4 is one .But he is a super player , just not at centre.
Id be looking around for someone to bring in at half and centre but if not those areas are musts next year for
extra creativity and strike . A lot rests on Eliott n Brett as it is.Were a fine team in this league but were starting to
look a little thin in areas.Still , were more than capable of winning our remaining games , and overall i wouldnt
complain if the board were more concerned with next year now.
them the chance to put right one off night.I think weve got to stick with Lupton now , and bring Dawes in .
I dont like square pegs in round holes and Olstrum at 4 is one .But he is a super player , just not at centre.
Id be looking around for someone to bring in at half and centre but if not those areas are musts next year for
extra creativity and strike . A lot rests on Eliott n Brett as it is.Were a fine team in this league but were starting to
look a little thin in areas.Still , were more than capable of winning our remaining games , and overall i wouldnt
complain if the board were more concerned with next year now.
Edited by DavidM, 28 July 2012 - 12:31 PM.
#8
Posted 28 July 2012 - 12:29 PM
Palfrey to start against Rochdale don't ya know ... Wow I went on to the town page really wanting to know that ..
Edited by DavidM, 28 July 2012 - 12:29 PM.
#9
Posted 28 July 2012 - 04:00 PM
Whoever the coaches pick I hope we can knock up quite a few points to boost our points difference total. If someone does us a favour and takes points off Doncaster it could come down to points difference as long as we beat Barrow by 13+.
I remember when .............................
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













