Faal and Flanagan join the Bulldogs
Started by
Chairman LMAO
, Sep 05 2012 09:17 PM
29 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 07 September 2012 - 12:04 PM
Your cal harold?
What does that mean?
What does that mean?
#22
Posted 07 September 2012 - 03:25 PM
(double post)
Edited by Blind side johnny, 07 September 2012 - 03:27 PM.
Believe what you see, don't see what you believe.
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#23
Posted 07 September 2012 - 03:25 PM
Well there's a post that doesn't make any sense!
Cal - abbreviation for calorie, sometimes wrongly used for kilocalorie - reference to Harold's long-overdue diet I presumed!
Believe what you see, don't see what you believe.
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#24
Posted 07 September 2012 - 04:02 PM
I would gladly take brev in exchange for faal - unfortunately brev has a little more loyalty than faal, and i doubt he would leave the dogs unless he were made to feel unwelcome - maybe harold could write him a letter expressing his opinion of him this season - it could help us reclaim him.Just err on the side of caution with Ayden Faal. Yes he can feed a winger and bust tackles I agree. But tell me in 6 months time what you think of his defence. We've shipped some points this season and Mr Faal was a willing helper in this department for the opposition. I wouldn't be surprised to see Brev back at Dewsbury. I don't think he ever wanted to leave. But I don't think WJ was a big fan. Maybe now with GM as coach he might consider a return.
#25
Posted 07 September 2012 - 04:08 PM
Don't say you weren't warned!
Be fair eddie, faals defence has been quite good this year - well by comparison to our other regular centre anyway.
#26
Posted 07 September 2012 - 07:57 PM
would that be the hirst you all thought was a donkey
we cant all be heroes because somebody has to sit on the curb and clap as they go by
come on you rams
come on you rams
#27
Posted 07 September 2012 - 08:02 PM
Be fair eddie, faals defence has been quite good this year - well by comparison to our other regular centre anyway.
I don`t know what you guys are moaning about. You have had some desent players off us in recent times;
Luke Stenchion, Chris Langley, David Rourke, Daley Williams were real good signings for you guys.
#28
Posted 08 September 2012 - 09:25 AM
I don`t know what you guys are moaning about. You have had some desent players off us in recent times;
Luke Stenchion, Chris Langley, David Rourke, Daley Williams were real good signings for you guys.
Chris Langley was an absolute waste of space for us, by and large. Real talent and ability as a centre, but terrible fitness levels and a visible complete lack of effort on occasions. The only time we ever saw what he was really capable of came at the tail end of both seasons he spent with us when, its safe to presume, he was playing for a new contract.
Edited by HaroldShand, 08 September 2012 - 09:26 AM.
What I'm looking for is someone who can contribute to what England has given to the world: culture, sophistication, genius. A little bit more than an 'ot dog, know what I mean?
#29
Posted 08 September 2012 - 11:08 AM
I don`t know what you guys are moaning about. You have had some desent players off us in recent times;
Luke Stenchion, Chris Langley, David Rourke, Daley Williams were real good signings for you guys.
Maybe but what about John Rangeley?
What a stitch-up!!
Believe what you see, don't see what you believe.
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#30
Posted 08 September 2012 - 11:52 AM
I don't think any of them were outstanding when they moved to the rams (stenchion was the pick). Maybe it was the coach.I don`t know what you guys are moaning about. You have had some desent players off us in recent times;
Luke Stenchion, Chris Langley, David Rourke, Daley Williams were real good signings for you guys.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













