G Mattinson
#141
Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:40 PM
#142
Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:51 PM
Or do you or any fair minded town fans think he had no knowledge of any of this and haven just filled all the forms in ,signed them themselves and sent them off to the RFL in the hope he would just say go on then ill play for you.I know you all want to see haven as the villan in this as in before or after the 1st of sept ,but lets be clear the player himself must have known what he was doing by either agreeing terms and or signing things.Unless of course he hasnt signed anything which is what away the brow says.I may be wrong and maybe some one knows but i think on a player regustration form both club and player have to sign it and as the RFL have already stated they have a form from haven then its fair to say at some point he has signed it.He will be playing for town next year and even as a haven fan i dont see what the club hopes to gain by going through this,i can understand them not being happy and even wanting it to be known whats gone on ,but to push it with the rfl seems pointless to me
Edited by haven4ever, 27 September 2012 - 09:44 PM.
#143
Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:13 PM
Personally I think no good will come out of it for either club. Matty is legitimately a Town fan and it's time to move on. End of.
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#144
Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:38 PM
#145
Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:48 PM
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#146
Posted 27 September 2012 - 10:31 PM
#147
Posted 28 September 2012 - 07:07 AM
nothing to brag about gonch, i wanted matty back at haven what attention i thought you guys would be well chuffedI know plenty mate just not an attention seeking no mark like your good self so I don't need to brag
#148
Posted 28 September 2012 - 07:15 AM
haven4ever Matty had agreed to certain terms for which he signed. The reason Matty signed was Haven officials told him they could change what they had agreed up to that point if he did not sign. Matty was very naive in signing just part of a contract. He did it because he did not know what Town were going to offer at that time. There were other issues one being length of playing contract which had not been discussed. So somebody at Whitehaven must of added this to the contract which Matty had previously signed at a later date without Matty knowing and they also falsified the date (1st September) on the contract because Matty had not dated it.unicorn which part of this do you not understand,like it or not at some point matty has agreed to join haven and signed either a pre contract agreement ,player registration form or both.He has then had a change of mind which given that it is months off the start if the new season i would say he is entitled to do as long as all parties are informed.
Or do you or any fair minded town fans think he had no knowledge of any of this and haven just filled all the forms in ,signed them themselves and sent them off to the RFL in the hope he would just say go on then ill play for you.I know you all want to see haven as the villan in this as in before or after the 1st of sept ,but lets be clear the player himself must have known what he was doing by either agreeing terms and or signing things.Unless of course he hasnt signed anything which is what away the brow says.I may be wrong and maybe some one knows but i think on a player regustration form both club and player have to sign it and as the RFL have already stated they have a form from haven then its fair to say at some point he has signed it.He will be playing for town next year and even as a haven fan i dont see what the club hopes to gain by going through this,i can understand them not being happy and even wanting it to be known whats gone on ,but to push it with the rfl seems pointless to me
Matty had not signed a registration form as a full contract had not been agreed.
If Matty had signed a valid contract why over the last two weeks has he been bombarded with phone calls from members of the Whitehaven board and coaching staff trying to persuade him to sign a legitimate contract with them. The reason is Matty was in serious talks with Town and Haven wanted him badly.
The reason why Matty was talking to Town and Haven was to make sure he was doing what was best for him and his family and then a make a decision.
haven4ever Matty had the decency to inform Whitehaven's head coach Dave Woods he was going to sign for Town.
haven4ever you have come on this forum and you have stated things about Matty which are false and utter rubbish. It was Whitehaven who illegally approached Matty and did everything to get him to sign and failed.
Whitehaven know exactly whats gone on and it does not surprise me how they have reacted looking at how they treated Don Gailer.
You would of thought Whitehaven would of accepted Matty's decision and moved on.
Edited by away the brow, 28 September 2012 - 08:05 AM.
#149
Posted 28 September 2012 - 07:39 AM
#150
Posted 28 September 2012 - 08:13 AM
Hope this saga doesn't ruin our relationship with Whitehaven fans.
PS I know nothing
Edited by Oneday, 28 September 2012 - 08:20 AM.
#151
Posted 28 September 2012 - 09:43 AM
Firstly the only thing i posted which you say is false is who contacted who ,you say the club approached him, the club say otherwise "he said ,she said".I will also say that if you read my previous posts i have said that what ever actions the player has taken it has been his right to do so and have no issues with that.
As soon as town got promoted they set about signing all their best players back on for next season, thacks, shacks miller etc.Given that in most peoples eyes matty is the best player at town you can be sure they will have been trying to get him signed back on and will not have waited until last week.Yet all the time no annoucement of him signing and for weeks and weeks stronger rumours he had signed for Haven, even on here town fans saying he had and that no news from the club was bad news about him staying.
He is well with in rights to talk to as many clubs as he see's fit to get the best deal for him and his family and at some point this deal must have been with Whitehaven other wise why sign anything? This is backed up again by no news of him signing anything with town and again the strong rumours coming out of both camps about who he had signed for,i don't buy this part contract thing i think any player signing for a club will be well aware what they are signing for terms etc.As for player registration, i find it strange that players don't have to sign these forms other wise clubs can submit them for any player and say he is registered to them.
At some point (last week by the sounds of things)he has changed his mind and decided to sign for town, again this will be down to an improved offer which by all accounts is a 3 year deal and not a 2 years with haven .No problem again pre season hasn't even started , not as if its a week or two before the season starts and hes being training and been paid by haven, its up to him who he plays for and its happened in the past jon roper signed for haven , then signed for cas in SL.
So then we have the situation now where both clubs say he has signed for them and the rugby league confirm this.he has done it of his own free will .The player himself has to take most of the responsibility for this debacle.
I do agree with your last sentence, and have post it on here.Whitehaven should just have moved on i don't see how pushing this matter benefits either club or the player, Whats the point of having a player on your books who wants to play else where,as a haven fan who supports his club to me it smacks of petty points scoring
Edited by haven4ever, 29 September 2012 - 11:42 AM.
#152
Posted 28 September 2012 - 10:22 AM
I do agree with your last sentence, and have post it on here.Whitehaven should just have moved on i don't see how pushing this matter benefits either club or the player,
Hmmmmm Whitehavens decision to date the contract 1st September when the player was away, and on the
first day they were allowed to speak to him, (cough cough) can only lead to one conclusion illegal approach
Or are you saying Haven rang him on 1st September, said Hiya Matty, even though we didn't pay you last time,
fancy signing a two year contract today? Blimey quick negotiations.
#153
Posted 28 September 2012 - 10:42 AM
#154
Posted 28 September 2012 - 11:16 AM
#155
Posted 28 September 2012 - 11:23 AM
Just a word of praise for all the Town fans who post on here. During the whole Matty saga not one person has come on here and rubbished the lad, we were all bitterly disappointed but kept our dignity by wishing him well. Could you imagine the abuse he would have got from that deluded bunch if the shoe was on the other foot !! Well done to everyone, you've been a credit to the club.
When do season tickets go on sale ? UP THE TOWN, and thanks Matty, you've made a lot of people very happy.
#156
Posted 28 September 2012 - 02:05 PM
#157
Posted 28 September 2012 - 02:28 PM
#158
Posted 28 September 2012 - 02:55 PM
He has all but held the club to ransom with his antics and shown them very little gratitude for how they treated him last year.If this was the other way around or any other club for that matter im sure Workington town fans would be using the term mercenary.The player is the only one to blame in all this ,no one forced him to sign for whitehaven and now one forced him to then sign for town both were of his own free will and show him to be interested in only one thing money.
Edited by harryclint, 28 September 2012 - 03:01 PM.
#159
Posted 28 September 2012 - 03:03 PM
#160
Posted 28 September 2012 - 03:10 PM
Also dont think that the player can't be punished over all this because he can.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













