Hillsborough (merged threads)
#21
Posted 12 September 2012 - 02:19 PM
#22
Posted 12 September 2012 - 02:34 PM
#23
Posted 12 September 2012 - 02:47 PM
And this guy: http://en.wikipedia..../Irvine_Patnick
it seems he is still alive, his comments will be interesting.
#24
Posted 12 September 2012 - 02:50 PM
I hope this isn't too off topic, but is David Cameron apologising on behalf of the Conservative Government because at the time of this disaster the country was also a Conservative Government? Or is that just coincedence?
Just coincidence. He's apologising on behalf of the British government and its representatives. It does resonate more because he's a Tory.
Milliband also apologised for the continuance of the cover-up under 'all governments since 1989' or similar line which covered the Labour side of things.
- Severus, July 2012
#25
Posted 12 September 2012 - 02:51 PM
it seems he is still alive, his comments will be interesting.
I'm hoping we can find some Liverpool fans to ###### on him and steal his possessions.
It's what he thinks they do after all.
- Severus, July 2012
#26
Posted 12 September 2012 - 02:55 PM
#27
Posted 12 September 2012 - 03:19 PM
1. There had been previous incidents
2. Sheffield Wednesday Football club had been warned that their ground was not safe.
3. The local authorities and the club let the game go ahead despite this
4. When the inevitable happened, the police and emergency services did not respond adequately.
5. the police then embarked on a deliberate cover up and deliberately misled the media and politicians, many of whom wanted to believe what they had been told rather than questioning it.
6. That cover up continued for many years.
Edited by JohnM, 12 September 2012 - 03:20 PM.
#28
Posted 12 September 2012 - 03:25 PM
"Perhaps it would be better that future criticism of sports be made on the narrow basis of what is being discussed, without reference to other sports, unless those sports offer a solution to the problem in hand." - Brian 'Pigface' Moore
"What happens in rugby union? A player takes the ball, moves forward a little and gets tackled. A whole load of players then roll about on the ground. Pheep! The referee gives a penalty." - Simon Barnes
#30
Posted 12 September 2012 - 03:27 PM
Now the cynical side of me would suggest that the tosser mackenzie had this statement prepared many moons ago for an event such as this. No contrition on that ballbags behalf at all. and the south yorkshire police had the date wrong, which tells me they hadn't prepared a statementAs well as Kelvin MacKenzie's weaselly apology, the original author of that Sun article is 'aghast' at the choice of headline. All of a sudden, like.
Edited by GURNER, 12 September 2012 - 03:47 PM.
#31
Posted 12 September 2012 - 04:51 PM
So, if I understand thing correctly.
1. There had been previous incidents
2. Sheffield Wednesday Football club had been warned that their ground was not safe.
3. The local authorities and the club let the game go ahead despite this
4. When the inevitable happened, the police and emergency services did not respond adequately.
5. the police then embarked on a deliberate cover up and deliberately misled the media and politicians, many of whom wanted to believe what they had been told rather than questioning it.
6. That cover up continued for many years.
The 1981 semi played between Spurs and Wolves at Hillsborough witnessed fans being ushered onto the pitch due to overcrowding. From what I have read of the incident, it appears a newly-built wall collapsed. Tottenham were awarded the Leppings Lane End, despite the club's overwhelming support.
#32
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:19 PM
I keep hearing this phrase.
justice has yet to be seen to be done
What would actually constitute justice, ie what does anyone involved want the conclusion/outcome/actions to be?
#33
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:23 PM
I would guess criminal charges against those responsible for the disaster and any cover up.I ask this in all innocence as I haven't followed this subject as closely as others
I keep hearing this phrase.
What would actually constitute justice, ie what does anyone involved want the conclusion/outcome/actions to be?
#34
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:23 PM
that those actually in a position to have been accountable for the disaster, face the justice system. Nothing more nothing lessI ask this in all innocence as I haven't followed this subject as closely as others
I keep hearing this phrase.
What would actually constitute justice, ie what does anyone involved want the conclusion/outcome/actions to be?
#35
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:26 PM
#36
Posted 12 September 2012 - 06:08 PM
I ask this in all innocence as I haven't followed this subject as closely as others
I keep hearing this phrase.
What would actually constitute justice, ie what does anyone involved want the conclusion/outcome/actions to be?
For mine there are a few things, some of which have happened today.
The first was the absolute and total removal of any suggestion of guilt from the dead themselves and the other fans there that day. The second was an acceptance that the 3.15pm cut off used at the inquest was ludicrous and wrong. Both those things have now happened but they should now lead to a new inquest looking at, where possible, the individual deaths themselves and now the totality of the day.
The final thing, for justice, is that a staggering criminal conspiracy has been laid bare. Not just besmirching the names of the dead, the injured, the survivors and the bereaved but removing from evidence and hiding from view the negligence and contempt that caused the deaths of 96 people. Those responsible should face the law.
- Severus, July 2012
#37
Posted 12 September 2012 - 06:37 PM
Will the same be true of him?
Raising money for Prostate Cancer UK - ran the Spire 10 mile in August and the Worksop Half Marathon in October - more to come in 2013
#38
Posted 12 September 2012 - 06:40 PM
I guess the first in line will be South Yorkshire Police
Then who? Will that be the end of it and a line be drawn or will this subject rumble on and others be pursued? If so who?
#39
Posted 12 September 2012 - 07:00 PM
maybe you are playing devils advocate, maybe you are just thick, maybe you should do some research and come back without prejudice. Your questions have been answered, why assume south yorks police would be first in line? go look it up if answers here are vagueI see all that but I also just keep hearing slogans and vagueness
I guess the first in line will be South Yorkshire Police
Then who? Will that be the end of it and a line be drawn or will this subject rumble on and others be pursued? If so who?
#40
Posted 12 September 2012 - 07:09 PM
maybe you are playing devils advocate, maybe you are just thick, maybe you should do some research and come back without prejudice. Your questions have been answered, why assume south yorks police would be first in line? go look it up if answers here are vague
Having seen a few minutes of the press conference at the cathedral on the news I simply wondered if this is a subject that can ever be concluded and what actions it would practically take for those so tragically involved to ever be at rest about it
It was always risky asking on here, where people are quick to jump down others throats.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













