The Duchess of Cambridge.
#21
Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:18 PM
#22
Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:21 PM
#23
Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:24 PM
Sir, you are no gentleman
She's quite an attractive woman. But big knockers she don't have. Its a no from me.
Push away the thief trying to steal your gift, the fighter is the one whose feet are swift.
#24
Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:26 PM
Some unfavourable comments on here. I for one wouldn't say no
. I haven't seen the photos but some paparazzi using a long lens is hardly going to do anyone any favours.
She is an attractive lady, but whenever I see her I'm reminded of a comment someone on here made about her just before the wedding: that she was unlikely to be a virgin as the romance had blossomed during their time in Scotland, where there is a general 'right to roam'.
Edit: can't believe I wrote there instead of their - senility!
Edited by Methven Hornet, 14 September 2012 - 05:30 PM.
#25
Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:37 PM
#26
Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:47 PM
So she shouldn't even go out in the garden of a private home she was privately renting with her husband?What I do think however is that a lack of common sense was applied by her. Yes, she was on private land and privacy should be respected. However, reality says it won't be, so if you don't want to be seen wearing so little, cover up unless indoors.
I think the Royals are going to sue the magazine. Good.
#27
Posted 14 September 2012 - 06:01 PM
#28
Posted 14 September 2012 - 06:57 PM
#29
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:27 PM
So she shouldn't even go out in the garden of a private home she was privately renting with her husband?
Not with her #### out, no.
I know she just needs to chill out and relax after a hard summer spectating at the Olympics, but some things she just can't do any more with the position she's carved out for herself.
#30
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:38 PM
Do we know that there were any fellow guests or "help"?
Nope
#31
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:43 PM
Not with her #### out, no.
I know she just needs to chill out and relax after a hard summer spectating at the Olympics, but some things she just can't do any more with the position she's carved out for herself.
So....this photographer, it wasn't you was it?
Push away the thief trying to steal your gift, the fighter is the one whose feet are swift.
#32
Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:21 PM
So....this photographer, it wasn't you was it?
If I was lucky enough to have been in the south of France a couple of weeks ago I wouldn't have spent my time looking for those two with my Fuji Finepix.
Edited by Jerry the Berry, 14 September 2012 - 09:21 PM.
#33
Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:26 PM
Push away the thief trying to steal your gift, the fighter is the one whose feet are swift.
#34
Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:51 PM
Do we know that there were any fellow guests or "help"?
No you're right, they just ordered pizza for 2 every night.
#35
Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:52 PM
Those two?
#36
Posted 14 September 2012 - 10:06 PM
Between this thread, ones about women's beach volleyball and general lazy, sexist, judgemental comments elsewhere, I am beginning to despair of this forum.
I always believed it to be the place were the intelligent RL fans resided, but I am rapidly losing hope, and posting less, which is a great shame for the forum's diversity as I am one of the few female members still kicking about. For how much longer remains to be seen.
FREE HANNERS!
This loony lefty political signature was brought to you by the Free Hanners Foundation which is dedicated to free speech on rugby league forums worldwide.
#37
Posted 14 September 2012 - 10:11 PM
Had I posted a thread about Harry and the size of his penis, there would have been a few choice replies.
Go ahead, I've seen many jokes about ginger nuts etc. Women are just as bad at judging on looks and whether a man earns loads or has a flash car etc.
Its just a bit of pee taking, that's all. No need to see everything so serious.
Push away the thief trying to steal your gift, the fighter is the one whose feet are swift.
#38
Posted 14 September 2012 - 10:22 PM
Had I posted a thread about Harry and the size of his penis, there would have been a few choice replies.
Between this thread, ones about women's beach volleyball and general lazy, sexist, judgemental comments elsewhere, I am beginning to despair of this forum.
I always believed it to be the place were the intelligent RL fans resided, but I am rapidly losing hope, and posting less, which is a great shame for the forum's diversity as I am one of the few female members still kicking about. For how much longer remains to be seen.
There are some on here who think diversity is a Lampeter old boys network.
#39
Posted 14 September 2012 - 10:32 PM
As for the comments about her appearance. She is a very beautiful woman and those who are criticising probably do not look like Brad Pitt (apologises if they do). Haven't we moved on from this carry on, benny hill style leering behaviour?
Edited by Severus, 14 September 2012 - 10:37 PM.
#40
Posted 14 September 2012 - 10:37 PM
Really? In my experience women are not turned on by visual stimulae, it's a combination of things that being a man I don't understand.The loadsa money, flash car thing is so eighties.Go ahead, I've seen many jokes about ginger nuts etc. Women are just as bad at judging on looks and whether a man earns loads or has a flash car etc.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













