Olstrum & Morris charged.....
#1
Posted 17 September 2012 - 04:16 PM
Morris has been charged with committing a Grade C dangerous throw in the seventh minute of the game; Olstrum has been charged with a Grade A punching offence in the same fixture.
The players are eligible to submit an Early Guilty Plea. They were charged after the incidents were viewed by the RFL Match Review Panel.
#2
Posted 17 September 2012 - 04:17 PM
#3
Posted 17 September 2012 - 04:23 PM
Morris is Grade C which carries a ban of 2 - 3 games if found guilty.
#4
Posted 17 September 2012 - 04:41 PM
#5
Posted 17 September 2012 - 04:47 PM
#6
Posted 17 September 2012 - 04:48 PM
#7
Posted 17 September 2012 - 04:53 PM
given that varks has a suspected broken jaw then i dont think karl will be that lucky
Luck doesn't come into it. The sentence for a Grade A offence is either NFA or 1 game ban. Under the new rules if you plead guilty early you get a 1 game reduction in the ban. So if he takes early plea then he can't be banned. I know you're from Whitehaven so I'll explain, one minus one equals none.
#8
Posted 17 September 2012 - 05:08 PM
given that varks has a suspected broken jaw then i dont think karl will be that lucky
We had this earlier in the season with Carter getting cited because they said a Haven player had a broken jaw and it turned out he hadn't!!!! What about Varkulis stamping on a Town player should we cite him?
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#9
Posted 17 September 2012 - 05:13 PM
#10
Posted 17 September 2012 - 05:26 PM
#11
Posted 17 September 2012 - 05:28 PM
Keith is alluding to when your mob cited Carter.keith haven haven't cited anyone.it must have come from the refs report as i cant image they woukd even have the dvd yet to review
#12
Posted 17 September 2012 - 05:30 PM
#13
Posted 17 September 2012 - 05:54 PM
How many people review it? FIVE?dont think they are ,cause its the play off im sure the panels sit every week and games are reviewd each week
#14
Posted 17 September 2012 - 06:09 PM
keith haven haven't cited anyone.it must have come from the refs report as i cant image they woukd even have the dvd yet to review
I'm not saying Haven cited our players but, when Carter was cited, it was said that Smith had a broken jaw as well but it turned out it was nothing of the sort and here we are again another broken jaw!!!!
I also was thinking how did the review panel get to view the incidents in order to say charge the players as the DVD wouldn't normally get there until Tuesday morning. How can they decide to charge a player from the refs report, especially when he never sent anyone off for either incident?
Edited by Keith T, 17 September 2012 - 06:09 PM.
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#15
Posted 17 September 2012 - 06:10 PM
#16
Posted 17 September 2012 - 06:46 PM
#17
Posted 17 September 2012 - 06:55 PM
#18
Posted 18 September 2012 - 04:45 PM
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#19
Posted 18 September 2012 - 04:51 PM
#20
Posted 18 September 2012 - 09:47 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













