Jump to content

  •  

Photo
- - - - -

Manchester Ship Canal


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#21 Ullman

Ullman

    Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6,343 posts

Posted 20 September 2012 - 06:07 PM

Wasn't it originally funded by merchants in Manchester who wanted to avoid the harbour taxes levied on ships coming up the Mersey? I may be wrong but its an interesting concept.

There was a very interesting program on this subject on the box a while back. The Liverpool port authorities of the time had the Manchester merchants over a barrel and they knew it. According to the program the Manchester merchants used to transport their goods across country to Hull for export because it was cheaper.
"I own up. I am a serial risk taker. I live in a flood zone, cycle without a helmet, drink alcohol and on Sunday I had bacon for breakfast."

#22 Trojan

Trojan

    Manager

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,749 posts

Posted 20 September 2012 - 06:55 PM

Well, I'm back... and I've come to claim my inheritance!

Does this mean your mum was Rita Tushingham? Your grandma Dora Bryan? I think we should be told <_<
"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#23 Griff9of13

Griff9of13

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,197 posts

Posted 20 September 2012 - 06:56 PM

There was a very interesting program on this subject on the box a while back. The Liverpool port authorities of the time had the Manchester merchants over a barrel and they knew it. According to the program the Manchester merchants used to transport their goods across country to Hull for export because it was cheaper.

Yep. And people think the Liverpool - Manchester rivalry is a new and football related thing, it goes back a long way. There is an old saying that sums it up well ''The Manchester man and the Liverpool gentleman''. Liverpool traditionally the home of commerce, finance and insurance and Manchester of manufacturing.

"it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it."

#24 longboard

longboard

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,076 posts

Posted 20 September 2012 - 08:35 PM

In the 1970's I went to the open day at a new chemical waste treatment works in Greater Manchester. The biggest operations at the plant were the neutralising of bulk acids and the separation/recovery of oil from bulk oil/water mixtures. Following filtration etc, the resultant waste water was pumped, under a historic arrangement, not to sewer but into the Ship Canal.


:o :o

#25 Red Willow

Red Willow

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,305 posts

Posted 23 September 2012 - 01:48 PM

There is regular usage from grain ships, getting stuck at Barton Swing bridge is annoying. The new docks is near the stadium and will use the locks at Irlam.

#26 tonyXIII

tonyXIII

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,609 posts

Posted 25 September 2012 - 06:24 PM

There is regular usage from grain ships, getting stuck at Barton Swing bridge is annoying. The new docks is near the stadium and will use the locks at Irlam.


As well as Eastham and Latchford, presumably? However, it will not require the Barton Swing bridge to be opened, though any downstream swing bridges (and there are quite a few!) will need to be opened, I imagine.

Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.


#27 Saint Billinge

Saint Billinge

    Assistant Coach

  • Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,111 posts

Posted 26 September 2012 - 07:42 AM

As well as Eastham and Latchford, presumably? However, it will not require the Barton Swing bridge to be opened, though any downstream swing bridges (and there are quite a few!) will need to be opened, I imagine.


Whilst on a tour of the Canal, our boat was delayed for forty minutes due to the broken mechanism of a lock gate, as well being delayed at the Canal swing bridge for 20 minutes due to some fault in the workings. Some journey!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users