9 replies to this topic

[The Phantom Horseman]

Incident considered Dangerous tackle in 56th minute Decision No charge Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law 15.1(a) (Strikes - Strikes with hand, arm or shoulder - Reckless) Tackle is late and player is off his feet however DVD is inconclusive as to point of contact. Concerning technique worthy of MRP Caution

personally I am pleased though I know not every Fev fan will see it that way. want to beat them fair and square.

linbk to that decision http://www.therfl.co...inary/item?4082

Edited by The Phantom Horseman, 24 September 2012 - 04:17 PM.

[Robin Evans]

agreed

[AJ & TJ]

If we play as we can then QLT or no QLT the result should be as it was last season. Cant wait for Sunday wish it would hurry up and get here.

[AlanE]

Incident considered Dangerous tackle in 56th minute Decision No charge Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law 15.1(a) (Strikes - Strikes with hand, arm or shoulder - Reckless) Tackle is late and player is off his feet however DVD is inconclusive as to point of contact. Concerning technique worthy of MRP Caution

personally I am pleased though I know not every Fev fan will see it that way. want to beat them fair and square.

linbk to that decision http://www.therfl.co...inary/item?4082

It will be good that Sheffield can field their strongest team - they'll need them.

Just on a technicality, surely the 'point of contact' is slightly irrelevant? The fact is that QLT actually clocked a player who hadn't actually got the ball.

[Andrew Vause]

Just to spaff on the fire a bit, I don't think we can moan about the outcome of The Rovers hearings tbh.

[Griff]

It will be good that Sheffield can field their strongest team - they'll need them.

Just on a technicality, surely the 'point of contact' is slightly irrelevant? The fact is that QLT actually clocked a player who hadn't actually got the ball.

Which is a penalty offence, not a sending off offence. That's the point.

[Robin Evans]

Just to spaff on the fire a bit, I don't think we can moan about the outcome of The Rovers hearings tbh.

agreed vausey. our players have done ok at disciplinary. especially ingy after he fettled that dozy ha'peth at hunslet

[Andrew Vause]

If we play as we can then QLT or no QLT the result should be as it was last season. Cant wait for Sunday wish it would hurry up and get here.

AJ & TJ what evidence on the 2 occasions that we have played Eagles this season gives you the confidence to say that there should be a 40 point win margin for Rovers on Sunday?We have often been accused of been arrogant by fans of other teams, do you not think that your statement just fuels the arrogance? I believe that Sheffield Eagles, much as I dislike them are well capable of dismantling any side in our division this season. I would and will approach Sunday with the utmost caution.

[Mr T]

AJ & TJ what evidence on the 2 occasions that we have played Eagles this season gives you the confidence to say that there should be a 40 point win margin for Rovers on Sunday?We have often been accused of been arrogant by fans of other teams, do you not think that your statement just fuels the arrogance? I believe that Sheffield Eagles, much as I dislike them are well capable of dismantling any side in our division this season. I would and will approach Sunday with the utmost caution.

I can't see where it says Rovers will win by 40, my interpretation is that if we play as we can (C@s, Wigan) then the result should be the same (i.e. a victory)

[Andrew Vause]

I can't see where it says Rovers will win by 40, my interpretation is that if we play as we can (C@s, Wigan) then the result should be the same (i.e. a victory)

Fair enough, my comprehension skills are obviously lacking, apologies all round. The same result as last year could have the inference of being an easy victory. As I say I have interpreted it incorrectly.

Edited by Andrew Vause, 24 September 2012 - 09:43 PM.