#1
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 01:32
#2
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 02:31
so what was the verdict. how did the vote go and was there any other business discussed?
All the clubs recommended by the Management were voted in for next year.
#3
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:26
All the clubs recommended by the Management were voted in for next year.
Does that mean a nine team NCL third division then, or are there other clubs dropping down from division 2?
2007 & 2008 West Midlands RLC Champions
2008 RLC Regional Grand Finalists
2008 RLC Team Of The Year
2011 RLC Midlands Premier Champions
www.bristolsonics.com
� Stupid Questions League Winner 2004 �
#4
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 03:46
All the clubs recommended by the Management were voted in for next year.
What clubs were recommended?
#5
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 04:15
CoventryWhat clubs were recommended?
Nottingham
Peterlee
Underbank
Kells
Hindley
Pilkington Recs
Wigan St Cuthberts
Barrow Island
#6
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 05:24
Clubs have until Wednesday to confirm that they accept their membership so I suspect the format of divisions below division 1 need to wait til then.Does that mean a nine team NCL third division then, or are there other clubs dropping down from division 2?
#7
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 06:52
#8
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 07:11
Ce message a été modifié par bowes - 25 septembre 2012 - 07:13 .
#9
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 07:18
The question of if the clubs meet the required standard was asked by one of the member clubs and the chairman of the NCL said that they all did so we can only assume that they do. This has been the way that the NCL have always done things regarding new clubs applying to join the league and that is that the management visit the clubs then look at all different aspects of their activities to see if they meet those standards, and only when thay do will the management recommend them to the member clubs.Bowes do they all meet the required standard ? The one on the ncl website ? I bet they don't ! Double standards more like
#10
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 07:47
#11
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 08:01
If a club is known to fail criteria it is not worth a visit.Thanks for replying , but as 4 of the clubs accepted don't have club Mark then seems like they are not fulfilling what is part of the criteria also I know that not all the applying clubs were visited .
#12
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 08:51
What happens to the management committee if it's found that one or more of these clubs don't meet the required criteria?The question of if the clubs meet the required standard was asked by one of the member clubs and the chairman of the NCL said that they all did so we can only assume that they do. This has been the way that the NCL have always done things regarding new clubs applying to join the league and that is that the management visit the clubs then look at all different aspects of their activities to see if they meet those standards, and only when thay do will the management recommend them to the member clubs.
http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/
#13
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 08:52
How would they know without a visit?If a club is known to fail criteria it is not worth a visit.
http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/
#14
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 08:54
A visit is necessary for ground criteria but not to see if a club fulfils its fixtures or has reserve and junior sides.How would they know without a visit?
#15
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 09:17
What happens to the management committee if it's found that one or more of these clubs don't meet the required criteria?
If the committee says they meet the criterea then they will.
End of story.
#16
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 09:21
Really, how many would have made it into the NCL 15 years ago?If the committee says they meet the criterea then they will.
End of story.
http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/
#17
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 09:22
Promotion to the community boardWhat happens to the management committee if it's found that one or more of these clubs don't meet the required criteria?
#18
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 09:24
If you went back 25 years then 31 out of the current 41 clubs would need kicking out including 4 out of the 5 Hull clubs.Really, how many would have made it into the NCL 15 years ago?
#19
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 09:33
31 of the current 41 weren't in it 25 years ago.If you went back 25 years then 31 out of the current 41 clubs would need kicking out including 4 out of the 5 Hull clubs.
#20
Posté 25 septembre 2012 - 09:38
Actually 33 weren't as one founder member is rejoining and one is absent. But the National League was actually limited to 10 clubs with 1 town 1 club. Meaning one of the current top 2 in premier wouldn't be allowed.31 of the current 41 weren't in it 25 years ago.
0 utilisateur(s) en train de lire ce sujet
0 membre(s), 0 invité(s), 0 utilisateur(s) anonyme(s)













