Totally agree mate
Noboy is questioning Darren's decisions. He was 1 point and 80 minutes off perfect.
He made it no secret of what he thought of DR and out of town players. I just wondered how the humble pie tastes that's all
Posted 04 October 2012 - 07:34 AM
Totally agree mate
Posted 04 October 2012 - 08:03 AM
Noboy is questioning Darren's decisions. He was 1 point and 80 minutes off perfect.
He made it no secret of what he thought of DR and out of town players. I just wondered how the humble pie tastes that's all
Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:55 AM
Posted 04 October 2012 - 10:36 AM
Posted 04 October 2012 - 10:40 AM
Not harping on Oracle just pointing out 12 months ago it was all wrong in Darren's eyes.
Although I'm not a fan of DR players, but only because how easy it is to lose them so quickly.
Posted 04 October 2012 - 10:46 AM
Posted 04 October 2012 - 11:19 AM
But 12 month ago Holty wasnt coach, and now he has to do whats right for the team and that means DR. If he hadnt gone down that route we may not have been promoted then people would have whinged about him not using it. Can win in my opinion
Posted 04 October 2012 - 11:21 AM
But 12 month ago Holty wasnt coach, and now he has to do whats right for the team and that means DR. If he hadnt gone down that route we may not have been promoted then people would have whinged about him not using it. Can win in my opinion
Posted 04 October 2012 - 11:59 AM
Posted 04 October 2012 - 12:03 PM
Posted 04 October 2012 - 12:22 PM
Everyone is entitled to change their minds.Your not getting it are you? Nobody is bother that Darren is using DR or out of Towners, but when people were telling Darren we need DR and out of Towners 12 months ago he said we didn't need them and it was wrong to be using them. Now he's coaching it's all of a sudden ok, like People were saying 12 months ago.
Posted 04 October 2012 - 12:28 PM
Bang on. 12 Month ago, Holty didnt believe we needed them. When he became coach and his circumstances changed, his opinon did likewise.Everyone is entitled to change their minds.
Would you want a Coach that didn't react and adapt as circumstances changed?
Posted 04 October 2012 - 12:30 PM
Everyone is entitled to change their minds.
Would you want a Coach that didn't react and adapt as circumstances changed?
Posted 04 October 2012 - 01:17 PM
I think what people are forgetting is that last season we didn't need DR players due the make up of the squad. It was only when we gained too many injuries to be competitive that it was looked at with a view of who was available and at what cost. The route of DR was decided by exactly that with the parent club deciding the agreement.Your not getting it are you? Nobody is bother that Darren is using DR or out of Towners, but when people were telling Darren we need DR and out of Towners 12 months ago he said we didn't need them and it was wrong to be using them. Now he's coaching it's all of a sudden ok, like People were saying 12 months ago.
Edited by soss, 04 October 2012 - 01:45 PM.
The fox running with the hounds
When you are in deep trouble, say nothing, and try to look as though you know what you're doing
.Posted 04 October 2012 - 01:46 PM

Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:02 PM
I think we all basically agree.My whole point of my first post was that he has realised you do need them.
Then I ended up having to explain why I said it, now it's being spun around again I give up.
Let's just say Darren "Don't knock it until you've tried it"
I shall say no more on this matter.
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:05 PM
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:16 PM
Just to clarify as I don't see why Soss should have to make excuses for me. My gripe with dual reg players remains and stems from the fact that the current squad at the time relied on several just to put a team out on the field(due to the overall squad size) and consisted of very few localised players and not so much the fact of cost etc. It was, and always has been, my belief that the way forward was with a prodominantly local side supplemented with travellers( carefully selected) in certain key positions. I remain dubious of the merits of dual registration for lower tier clubs but admit that we were very lucky with the lads we brought in last year.......other clubs were not so lucky in terms of intermittent appearances and so on. It is important to state that, just as last year, we have no plans to go down the dual reg route unless we get hit with an injury crisis similar to last year which forces our hands. Even then, the deal would have to be right for Barrow RLFC as it was this year and actually saved the club some finance..........again, a very different picture than that of the 2/3 previous years. In a nutshell, dual reg is an option for all clubs but is not the route we want to go down..........only the permenant/temporary loss of 9-10 'LOCAL' players will then make it a consideration- but only then.
I hope 'Balls' & even 'Rooster' can recognise the difference between previous years approaches in this regard and understand that my long held view of dual registration remains constant...........not the way forward.
Regards.( and sorry for butting in on the forum guys)
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:17 PM
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:34 PM
The fox running with the hounds
When you are in deep trouble, say nothing, and try to look as though you know what you're doing
.0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users