Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Don't forget to sign if you havn't already done so.


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 clement

clement
  • Coach
  • 567 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:20 AM

http://www.ipetition...yestopromotion/

#2 MrPosh

MrPosh
  • Coach
  • 3,241 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:28 AM

I really, really hate your term 'the British way'.

For that reason, I'm out.
People called Romans they go the house

#3 Johnoco

Johnoco
  • Coach
  • 20,369 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:30 AM

Is this an order or what?

What if you disagree with the petition?

#4 jannerboyuk

jannerboyuk
  • Coach
  • 4,966 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:36 AM

no ta
PROUD TO BE A MEMBER OF http://www.rugbyleaguecares.org/ and http://www.walesrugb...-wales-for-2013
Predictions for the future -
Crusaders RL to get a franchise for 2012 onwards -WRONG
Widnes Vikings also to get a franchise - RIGHT
Crusaders RL to do the double over Widnes and finish five places ahead of them -WRONG
Widnes Vikings NOT to dominate rugby league in years to come! STILL TO COME

http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/cardiffdemonsrlfc/
http://www.walesrugbyleague.co.uk/

I promise to pay �10 to the charity of Bomb Jacks choice if Widnes Millionaires finish above the battling underdogs Crusaders RL. I OWE A TENNER!
http://www.jaxaxe.co...89/Default.aspx

#5 dkw

dkw
  • Workington
  • 4,835 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:36 AM

I disagree with it, so wont be signing it.

#6 Gav Wilson

Gav Wilson
  • Coach
  • 3,307 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:37 AM

What will this achieve exactly?
Posted Image

#7 Johnoco

Johnoco
  • Coach
  • 20,369 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:40 AM

What will this achieve exactly?

If they get a certain number of 'signatures' doesn't parliament have to debate the issue...or something? ;)

#8 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,394 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:45 AM

They wonder why we'll never beat the aussies when they keep focusing on the desire to increase intensity at the bottom of the table rather than the top.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#9 Adeybull

Adeybull
  • Coach
  • 497 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:49 AM

I really, really hate your term 'the British way'.

For that reason, I'm out.


Me too.

Very bad mistake, that.

#10 Grinner

Grinner
  • Coach
  • 452 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:51 AM

hmmmm. I'm a bit torn on P&R vs licensing, but I have to take issue with some of the petition, and agree with other bits.


"It’s ‘the British way’ of doing things. Do we really think that the same old sides year in, year out playing in the top flight is good for the game? If you take away the dream of top flight Rugby League from the Championship clubs, you take away their lifeblood. Where is the incentive to invest in the squad if there is no prospect of promotion?"

RL only introduced promotion and relegation in 1972, until then it was a single closed league (that, incidentally, used a play-off system to determine the champions)

"Likewise, without the threat of relegation where is the incentive for Super League clubs to improve, knowing they can and will remain in the top flight year on year."

This may well be a fair point

"Promotion and relegation adds excitement and drama to the season at both ends of the tables. Currently bottom of the table fixtures are played out as meaningless games."

True.

"The loss of competitiveness, threatens in the long term to damage spectator and TV audiences for the sport. Too many predictable, one-sided games will make people switch off or not bother to turn up."

The evidence, from clubs like Leigh in SL and Huddersfield in CC, suggests that P&R leads to more predicatable, one sided games.

Put me in the "don't know" box for now...

Edited by Grinner, 05 October 2012 - 11:51 AM.


#11 l'angelo mysterioso

l'angelo mysterioso
  • Coach
  • 42,282 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 05:44 PM

http://www.ipetition...yestopromotion/


no thanks
WELCOME TO THE ROYSTON VASEY SUPER LEAGUE 2015
Keeping it local

#12 Methven Hornet

Methven Hornet
  • Coach
  • 9,496 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:57 PM

A bit bored tonight so I thought I'd do a bit of analysis of the 'petition'.

The 'petition' has been up and running for 20 weeks, and the pattern of signatures has been as follows:-


1 - 541
2 - 70
3 - 11
4 - 35
5 - 10
6 - 8
7 - 1
8 - 1
9 - 2
10 - 0
11 - 0
12 - 1
13 - 1
14 - 0
15 - 1
16 - 4
17 - 4
18 - 1
19 - 177
20 - 277

So the thing started with a bang, when it was in the papers, and then quickly petered out - until it was revived in the last seven days or so.

Unfortunately, the petition software allows the same person/email address/ISP addredd to sign multiple times - as Alfie Duplicate has just demonstrated. At the time of posting this message there have been at least 74 duplicate names added - with at least 48 duplicates added in the signing frenzy over the past week. How many false names have been added by the same person is anyone's guess.

Then there are 14 signatures with either initials or just a first name, to say nothing of Eddie Hemmings (does he agree with auto p&r?), C### Flaps, Junior Centurions and Leigh Rugby. Oh, and some guy who thinks Andrew Lansley is a disgrace!

32 of the signatories mistakenly believe that we have a system of franchising, and at least one guy wants to revert to part-time rugby so that standards can be evened out.

Sorry, this petition has no credibility at all.
"There are now more pandas in Scotland than Tory MPs."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users