Jump to content


Rugby League World - Grand Finals Issue

RUGBY LEAGUE WORLD - THE GRAND FINALS ISSUE - OUT 17 OCT OR DOWNLOAD IT NOW!
Try our Fantastic 4-Issue Bundle Offer:
For just £14, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:

The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final drama from both hemispheres plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

pro rugby


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 oldrover

oldrover
  • Coach
  • 6,085 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 09:17 AM

do you think we will still have full time professional rugby league in this country in 5 years time?
joe mullaney is a god
the only good tiger is a stuffed tiger

Posted Image

#2 Robin Evans

Robin Evans

    Robin Evans

  • Coach
  • 10,037 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 09:49 AM

Not sure we can sustain it now OR. Too many clubs spending too much. Too few players of sufficient quality to go round. Clubs like northern going ar se uppards by paying our far too much.
Wwould a return to semi pro really be such a bad thing? How many players would we lose to other sports?
Dunno. But if the IncreasIng number of clubs like northern continue to experience serious difficulties I can't see how returning to semi pro can be avoided.

"I love our club, absolutely love it". (Overton, M 2007)

#3 bigjohn

bigjohn
  • Coach
  • 975 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 10:21 AM

I think the master plan was to get rid of the semi pro sides but to the credit of the Championship clubs most have just about survived. I seem to remember last year talk of increasing the salary cap at SL level that seems to have died a death. Looking at the crowds to watch the semi finals of the play offs I think we can sadly say the game is on its last legs.

#4 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,803 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:49 AM

do you think we will still have full time professional rugby league in this country in 5 years time?


Yes, of course we will.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#5 Gav Wilson

Gav Wilson
  • Coach
  • 3,306 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 01:47 PM

do you think we will still have full time professional rugby league in this country in 5 years time?


Yes. Absolutely.
Posted Image

#6 lingard

lingard
  • Coach
  • 1,314 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:25 PM

Not sure we can sustain it now OR. Too many clubs spending too much. Too few players of sufficient quality to go round. Clubs like northern going ar se uppards by paying our far too much.
Wwould a return to semi pro really be such a bad thing? How many players would we lose to other sports?
Dunno. But if the IncreasIng number of clubs like northern continue to experience serious difficulties I can't see how returning to semi pro can be avoided.

I suggested this a few weeks ago and got shot down in flames by someone on here.

I agree that it is unsustainable to continue down the pro route. Even at the end of a career a pro player has to look to another sourse of income after RL. There is just not enough money in it.
I demand to have some booze, I want it here and I want it now!

#7 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,803 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:58 PM

I agree that it is unsustainable to continue down the pro route. Even at the end of a career a pro player has to look to another sourse of income after RL. There is just not enough money in it.


:blink:

If I finished a job at 30, I wouldn't be expecting to retire. Players need to do what other folk do and get another job.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#8 Steve Slater

Steve Slater
  • Coach
  • 1,897 posts

Posted 08 October 2012 - 04:37 PM

It would be interesting to know what the players think! Those on the higher salaries will probably love it, but i'm not too sure about those at the bottom of the income scale? I suspect they want to play at the highest level but would prefer to have a job and play part-time? They may also wish to develop a career, but their contract would probably prevent this? But then again, playing for Rovers can be restrictive to certain careers, as in the case of Danny Grimshaw.

#9 Bob Crowther

Bob Crowther
  • Coach
  • 2,661 posts

Posted 09 October 2012 - 01:18 PM

Not taking into account the leagues below SL, we hear very little about the salaries and bonuses earned by the SL performers, unlike the soccer fraternity who splash their multi million pound wages across the media.
Let us take into account, the fact that most of these SL lads will earn more in their "short" playing careers than the normal working man will earn in his working span.
The same approach can be applied to the fact that players are most likely being paid far too much in the top flight which is obviously causing financial problems in some cases.
We at FEV are satisfied with the rugby being produced, this, on the whole, being on a part time basis.

#10 lingard

lingard
  • Coach
  • 1,314 posts

Posted 09 October 2012 - 02:10 PM

:blink:

If I finished a job at 30, I wouldn't be expecting to retire. Players need to do what other folk do and get another job.


After all the hammer they get playing? Footballers in the 'elite' don't need to work after their careers have ended.

I thought that was the idea of being pro. If a SL player has to start to build a career after RL when he is 30+, he has wasted 16 years playing rugby and may as well of played at championship level.
I demand to have some booze, I want it here and I want it now!

#11 lingard

lingard
  • Coach
  • 1,314 posts

Posted 09 October 2012 - 02:12 PM

Not taking into account the leagues below SL, we hear very little about the salaries and bonuses earned by the SL performers, unlike the soccer fraternity who splash their multi million pound wages across the media.
Let us take into account, the fact that most of these SL lads will earn more in their "short" playing careers than the normal working man will earn in his working span.

Do you really think so. 60 - 70 k a year for the avarage SL player I would have thought a liberal estimate. it's hardly the big time.


The same approach can be applied to the fact that players are most likely being paid far too much in the top flight which is obviously causing financial problems in some cases.
We at FEV are satisfied with the rugby being produced, this, on the whole, being on a part time basis.


I demand to have some booze, I want it here and I want it now!

#12 Bob Crowther

Bob Crowther
  • Coach
  • 2,661 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 12:47 PM

After all the hammer they get playing? Footballers in the 'elite' don't need to work after their careers have ended.

I thought that was the idea of being pro. If a SL player has to start to build a career after RL when he is 30+, he has wasted 16 years playing rugby and may as well of played at championship level.

In the fifties and early sixties, I worked underground alongside most of the Wakefield team of that time. We also had one or two of the Huddersfield team. Some of them finished up as successful business men with their own companies and shops. Some of them blew it in. This was in the days of part time rugby.Not a game for the purist, but very entertaining and worth watching.

#13 oldrover

oldrover
  • Coach
  • 6,085 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 03:31 PM

thing is Bob, if we went part time, fitness levels would drop. how would we maintain our competetiveness against the full time aussies and kiwis.
joe mullaney is a god
the only good tiger is a stuffed tiger

Posted Image

#14 lingard

lingard
  • Coach
  • 1,314 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 04:03 PM

thing is Bob, if we went part time, fitness levels would drop. how would we maintain our competetiveness against the full time aussies and kiwis.

we managed to be more than competative this year against the worst and best off SL. You figure which one was which.

Edited by lingard, 10 October 2012 - 04:04 PM.

I demand to have some booze, I want it here and I want it now!

#15 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,803 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:28 AM

After all the hammer they get playing? Footballers in the 'elite' don't need to work after their careers have ended.

I thought that was the idea of being pro. If a SL player has to start to build a career after RL when he is 30+, he has wasted 16 years playing rugby and may as well of played at championship level.


They're not soccer players. There's not enough money in the game to support them for the rest of their lives. Lots of people change careers during their lives.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#16 oldrover

oldrover
  • Coach
  • 6,085 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:34 AM

we managed to be more than competative this year against the worst and best off SL. You figure which one was which.

my post was tongue in cheek, should have had a :rolleyes:
joe mullaney is a god
the only good tiger is a stuffed tiger

Posted Image

#17 Bob Crowther

Bob Crowther
  • Coach
  • 2,661 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 02:17 PM

thing is Bob, if we went part time, fitness levels would drop. how would we maintain our competetiveness against the full time aussies and kiwis.

I think that taking into account the fitness regime that we have at Fev, surely other clubs could reach or even surpass this level. The one outstanding feature of that era was the fact that most teams played in front of capacity crowds, a situation which is very, very rare today, even taking into account so called improved standards on the field, full time refs and state of the art stadiums. 15 thou was a regular feature at Belle Vue.

#18 Griff

Griff
  • Coach
  • 7,803 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:10 PM

I think that taking into account the fitness regime that we have at Fev, surely other clubs could reach or even surpass this level. The one outstanding feature of that era was the fact that most teams played in front of capacity crowds, a situation which is very, very rare today, even taking into account so called improved standards on the field, full time refs and state of the art stadiums. 15 thou was a regular feature at Belle Vue.


Different times. A lot more choice for your leisure time these days.
"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

#19 Gav Wilson

Gav Wilson
  • Coach
  • 3,306 posts

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:54 PM

Some of the views in this thread are so backwards its frightening.

I'm just going to pretend you are all being really sarcastic instead.
Posted Image

#20 petesmithfan

petesmithfan
  • Coach
  • 1,386 posts

Posted 12 October 2012 - 05:33 AM

Backwards or Realistic Gav?

VIVA THE FEVOLUTION