pro rugby
#2
Posted 08 October 2012 - 09:49 AM
Wwould a return to semi pro really be such a bad thing? How many players would we lose to other sports?
Dunno. But if the IncreasIng number of clubs like northern continue to experience serious difficulties I can't see how returning to semi pro can be avoided.
#3
Posted 08 October 2012 - 10:21 AM
#4
Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:49 AM
do you think we will still have full time professional rugby league in this country in 5 years time?
Yes, of course we will.
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#5
Posted 08 October 2012 - 01:47 PM
do you think we will still have full time professional rugby league in this country in 5 years time?
Yes. Absolutely.
#6
Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:25 PM
I suggested this a few weeks ago and got shot down in flames by someone on here.Not sure we can sustain it now OR. Too many clubs spending too much. Too few players of sufficient quality to go round. Clubs like northern going ar se uppards by paying our far too much.
Wwould a return to semi pro really be such a bad thing? How many players would we lose to other sports?
Dunno. But if the IncreasIng number of clubs like northern continue to experience serious difficulties I can't see how returning to semi pro can be avoided.
I agree that it is unsustainable to continue down the pro route. Even at the end of a career a pro player has to look to another sourse of income after RL. There is just not enough money in it.
#7
Posted 08 October 2012 - 03:58 PM
I agree that it is unsustainable to continue down the pro route. Even at the end of a career a pro player has to look to another sourse of income after RL. There is just not enough money in it.
If I finished a job at 30, I wouldn't be expecting to retire. Players need to do what other folk do and get another job.
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#8
Posted 08 October 2012 - 04:37 PM
#9
Posted 09 October 2012 - 01:18 PM
Let us take into account, the fact that most of these SL lads will earn more in their "short" playing careers than the normal working man will earn in his working span.
The same approach can be applied to the fact that players are most likely being paid far too much in the top flight which is obviously causing financial problems in some cases.
We at FEV are satisfied with the rugby being produced, this, on the whole, being on a part time basis.
#10
Posted 09 October 2012 - 02:10 PM
If I finished a job at 30, I wouldn't be expecting to retire. Players need to do what other folk do and get another job.
After all the hammer they get playing? Footballers in the 'elite' don't need to work after their careers have ended.
I thought that was the idea of being pro. If a SL player has to start to build a career after RL when he is 30+, he has wasted 16 years playing rugby and may as well of played at championship level.
#11
Posted 09 October 2012 - 02:12 PM
Not taking into account the leagues below SL, we hear very little about the salaries and bonuses earned by the SL performers, unlike the soccer fraternity who splash their multi million pound wages across the media.
Let us take into account, the fact that most of these SL lads will earn more in their "short" playing careers than the normal working man will earn in his working span.
Do you really think so. 60 - 70 k a year for the avarage SL player I would have thought a liberal estimate. it's hardly the big time.
The same approach can be applied to the fact that players are most likely being paid far too much in the top flight which is obviously causing financial problems in some cases.
We at FEV are satisfied with the rugby being produced, this, on the whole, being on a part time basis.
#12
Posted 10 October 2012 - 12:47 PM
In the fifties and early sixties, I worked underground alongside most of the Wakefield team of that time. We also had one or two of the Huddersfield team. Some of them finished up as successful business men with their own companies and shops. Some of them blew it in. This was in the days of part time rugby.Not a game for the purist, but very entertaining and worth watching.After all the hammer they get playing? Footballers in the 'elite' don't need to work after their careers have ended.
I thought that was the idea of being pro. If a SL player has to start to build a career after RL when he is 30+, he has wasted 16 years playing rugby and may as well of played at championship level.
#14
Posted 10 October 2012 - 04:03 PM
we managed to be more than competative this year against the worst and best off SL. You figure which one was which.thing is Bob, if we went part time, fitness levels would drop. how would we maintain our competetiveness against the full time aussies and kiwis.
Edited by lingard, 10 October 2012 - 04:04 PM.
#15
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:28 AM
After all the hammer they get playing? Footballers in the 'elite' don't need to work after their careers have ended.
I thought that was the idea of being pro. If a SL player has to start to build a career after RL when he is 30+, he has wasted 16 years playing rugby and may as well of played at championship level.
They're not soccer players. There's not enough money in the game to support them for the rest of their lives. Lots of people change careers during their lives.
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#17
Posted 11 October 2012 - 02:17 PM
I think that taking into account the fitness regime that we have at Fev, surely other clubs could reach or even surpass this level. The one outstanding feature of that era was the fact that most teams played in front of capacity crowds, a situation which is very, very rare today, even taking into account so called improved standards on the field, full time refs and state of the art stadiums. 15 thou was a regular feature at Belle Vue.thing is Bob, if we went part time, fitness levels would drop. how would we maintain our competetiveness against the full time aussies and kiwis.
#18
Posted 11 October 2012 - 06:10 PM
I think that taking into account the fitness regime that we have at Fev, surely other clubs could reach or even surpass this level. The one outstanding feature of that era was the fact that most teams played in front of capacity crowds, a situation which is very, very rare today, even taking into account so called improved standards on the field, full time refs and state of the art stadiums. 15 thou was a regular feature at Belle Vue.
Different times. A lot more choice for your leisure time these days.
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#19
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:54 PM
I'm just going to pretend you are all being really sarcastic instead.
#20
Posted 12 October 2012 - 05:33 AM
VIVA THE FEVOLUTION
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














