But how is the travelling any different to what out of town players for the 3 cumbrian clubs done to date? Barrow have signed 5-6 youngesters from Saints, Leeds, Warrington and Wigan recently wo are going to be travelling 2-3 times a week.
Anyway, think Haven will get the more experienced Saints players being in the CC, whereas Rochdale will get the developing players in the CC1
Whitehaven Saints
#41
Posted 13 October 2012 - 01:56 PM
#42
Posted 13 October 2012 - 02:04 PM
#43
Posted 13 October 2012 - 02:25 PM
#44
Posted 13 October 2012 - 02:50 PM
Each SL club can form a partnership with a Championship or Championship 1 club and if they want to form a link with a 2nd Championship club that 2nd club can only be in certain areas of the country outside the M62 corridor or Wales and France. Cumbria is named as one of these areas which means that because of travelling issues that some have already highlighted our clubs will fall in to the 2nd club grouping for use by SL clubs. Obviously to get full value from these partnerships Championship clubs in close proximity to a SL club can get benefits such as training facilities, medical and physio facilities, sports science, etc, etc, on a regular basis if not weekly, whereas our clubs would get them as and when we could afford to take up the offer to use them.
I asked how this system would work within the Championship(s) salary cap(s) with SL players who are obviously on larger salaries than Championship players. If the SL club pays the salary it would still give an unfair advantage to a Championship club having a highly paid full-time professionals services that under other circumstances would have put the Championship club over the salary cap limit. This point had been made and they have come up with some sort of system whereby the SL players will all be given a "value" for the purposes of fitting in with the Championship(s) salary cap levels. My reading of this is that it will depend on how much of a clubs salary cap has been spent on non-partnership players as to the "value" of players they will be able to fit in under this system.
I said from the outset that I thought the RFL were opening a can of worms and I have not heard of anything to suggest otherwise. I can envisage all sorts of arguments about player "values" at different clubs for instance and clubs along the M62 corridor are bound to have an advantage over our clubs in Cumbria, London, Wales, etc. I mentioned about players not wanting to travel to west Cumbria on a regular basis for training or playing and again it is something that the SL club has to be strict on if the system is to work. They did say that they have put funding in for the new Cumbria academy to help keep players in our area though!!!!
All this to save SL clubs having to pay out £100k per annum for their reserve teams, so how much of their savings will be passed down the line?
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#45
Posted 13 October 2012 - 04:58 PM
none of the savings will be passed down keith. This is all to benefit SL clubs.There are so many questions about this new system that require answers and new questions appear every day. I have asked the RFL about several issues and had a reply. First of all the current system was a dual registration scheme for Under 23 players only between SL and Championship clubs. The new system is now for any age of player, although as the SL clubs will be running Under 19 teams I would imagine that most players will be Over 20 and the maximum number that a club can have under the system is 5, one more than under the current system.
Each SL club can form a partnership with a Championship or Championship 1 club and if they want to form a link with a 2nd Championship club that 2nd club can only be in certain areas of the country outside the M62 corridor or Wales and France. Cumbria is named as one of these areas which means that because of travelling issues that some have already highlighted our clubs will fall in to the 2nd club grouping for use by SL clubs. Obviously to get full value from these partnerships Championship clubs in close proximity to a SL club can get benefits such as training facilities, medical and physio facilities, sports science, etc, etc, on a regular basis if not weekly, whereas our clubs would get them as and when we could afford to take up the offer to use them.
I asked how this system would work within the Championship(s) salary cap(s) with SL players who are obviously on larger salaries than Championship players. If the SL club pays the salary it would still give an unfair advantage to a Championship club having a highly paid full-time professionals services that under other circumstances would have put the Championship club over the salary cap limit. This point had been made and they have come up with some sort of system whereby the SL players will all be given a "value" for the purposes of fitting in with the Championship(s) salary cap levels. My reading of this is that it will depend on how much of a clubs salary cap has been spent on non-partnership players as to the "value" of players they will be able to fit in under this system.
I said from the outset that I thought the RFL were opening a can of worms and I have not heard of anything to suggest otherwise. I can envisage all sorts of arguments about player "values" at different clubs for instance and clubs along the M62 corridor are bound to have an advantage over our clubs in Cumbria, London, Wales, etc. I mentioned about players not wanting to travel to west Cumbria on a regular basis for training or playing and again it is something that the SL club has to be strict on if the system is to work. They did say that they have put funding in for the new Cumbria academy to help keep players in our area though!!!!
All this to save SL clubs having to pay out £100k per annum for their reserve teams, so how much of their savings will be passed down the line?
#46
Posted 13 October 2012 - 06:29 PM
#47
Posted 13 October 2012 - 06:51 PM
Edited by DavidM, 13 October 2012 - 06:56 PM.
#48
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:20 AM
#49
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:46 AM
#50
Posted 14 October 2012 - 10:02 AM
or having four or five players hanging on to him round his neck shorts legs ,but still kept going forwardAye nowt but good memories of Hepi. You could guarantee if the game was a bit flat and the lads weren't firing Brad would swing an arm or put a big hit in and get both the crowd and the players fired up. I think he kinda enjoyed lifting the trophies too, I remember him milking it for all it was worth in his shades!!
#51
Posted 18 October 2012 - 07:07 PM
Give my blog a read if you like!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













