Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 402

Try our Fantastic 5-Issue Bundle Offer! For just £18, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:
The Play-offs Issue - pictured (out 12 Sept) – Covering the climax of the Super League & Championship seasons
The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final excitement from both sides of the world plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Benefit of the Doubt


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 G Las D

G Las D
  • Moderator
  • 14,830 posts

Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:05 PM

Bill Harrigan wants Benefit of the Doubt reviewed.

Benefit ot doubt nearly came off the rails in the 2012 season.
Frame by frame replays in almost stop motion from every conceivable angle to the nth degree brought about some 'doubtful' (incorrect) decisions on occasions. Sometimes just watching the incident a couple of times from the best angle at normal speed would probably lead to a common sense and more acceptable result.
Its too late to say sorry after the game when the outcome of the game may have been affected.

ARLForumstrap2014_zps302d9d20.jpg   

*************** Disciple of Experience **************


#2 Bourbon Rat

Bourbon Rat
  • Coach
  • 1,833 posts

Posted 13 October 2012 - 04:17 AM

Given the number of angles now available to the Video Offical there should be no doubt :wacko:

Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite

and furthermore always carry a small snake - W C Fields


#3 G Las D

G Las D
  • Moderator
  • 14,830 posts

Posted 13 October 2012 - 12:07 PM

My point is the video refs go way beyond common sense. They examine the images in minute detail to the point where they lose oversight of the original move. Where they have examined everything and still can't be sure, before giving try benefit of the doubt they should just run the thing through again at normal speed and make sure their view is consistent with common sense.

Edited by G Las D, 13 October 2012 - 12:08 PM.

ARLForumstrap2014_zps302d9d20.jpg   

*************** Disciple of Experience **************


#4 Stoney100

Stoney100
  • Coach
  • 116 posts

Posted 13 October 2012 - 07:20 PM

Hate benefit of the doubt - should be yes I am convince he has scored - try otherwise no try - basically if you are not sure after the review with all the replays and camera angles - it is simple a no try call not a call that say benefit of the doubt - wouldn't have a thing like that in a court of law (not sure but he looks Ok - let him off :rolleyes: ).

Edited by Stoney100, 13 October 2012 - 07:27 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users