Squad Numbers
#1
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:53 PM
What are peoples thoughts on this? Would you prefer the 1-17 shirts to stay?
#2
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:58 PM
"CENSORSHIP IS ALIVE AND WELL ON THIS FORUM"
#3
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:48 PM
#4
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:25 AM
#5
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:26 AM
I hate the squad numbers system - think we had to buy fifty odd shirts a couple of seasons ago. I would prefer it that teamsheets be mandatorily given out at the gate, and that there are enough to go round. Maybe clubs could also consider putting up chalkboards up inside the ground and bars with the teams on like they used to in the old days.It's got to be squad numbers. At least they are printed in the programme and you know who people are. How many times have you tried to listen to the teams being read out (at LoveRugby.com and elsewhere) and you cannot hear who is playing?
#6
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:32 AM
#7
Posted 15 October 2012 - 12:18 PM
#8
Posted 15 October 2012 - 02:00 PM
They're much tighter fitting these days - we've ended up duplicating loads of jerseys so the cost saving of 1-17 is totally illusory.
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#9
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:53 PM
I hate the squad numbers system - think we had to buy fifty odd shirts a couple of seasons ago. I would prefer it that teamsheets be mandatorily given out at the gate, and that there are enough to go round. Maybe clubs could also consider putting up chalkboards up inside the ground and bars with the teams on like they used to in the old days.
Only for A team games surely GOR?
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#10
Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:51 PM
#11
Posted 16 October 2012 - 09:08 AM
It was still a good idea though - for the first team games you bought a program and then spent the first ten minutes of the match altering the names of the players on the teamsheet - if you were a collector you had to buy two so you had a pristine copy. Ahh ! happy days.Only for A team games surely GOR?
#12
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:59 AM
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#13
Posted 29 October 2012 - 11:28 AM
The numbers are actually an irrelevance.
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#14
Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:06 PM
A bit outside the box maybe but why bother with numbers at all? If the shirts are effectively allocated to individuals then why not just print their names across the back?
The numbers are actually an irrelevance.
Easier to see a number than a name BSJ - especially for those of us of advancing years!
#15
Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:33 PM
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#16
Posted 29 October 2012 - 01:04 PM
Easier to see a number than a name BSJ - especially for those of us of advancing years!
But then you still need your checklist of 25 players to find out which one is which number Fred, and that's just for the home team. for the away side you've got no chance.
Maybe I'll struggle when I reach your age.
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#17
Posted 29 October 2012 - 02:58 PM
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#18
Posted 29 October 2012 - 04:10 PM
You soon learn them.
It's easier just to recognise the players - but that doesn't help with the away side, and I'm not about to learn the squad numbers of every team in the division.
Squad numbers eh ? makes you wonder how we managed without them for a hundred years.
#19
Posted 29 October 2012 - 05:00 PM
It's easier just to recognise the players - but that doesn't help with the away side, and I'm not about to learn the squad numbers of every team in the division.
Squad numbers eh ? makes you wonder how we managed without them for a hundred years.
We had baggier jerseys.
And that's not a facetious reply.
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#20
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:34 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













