Don't accuse me of what I am not. All I want is to debate the truth and not be set up as some sort of SL villain you are out to conquor........
Huddersfield and London are not in Superleague because of their attendances. they are in because millionaires pump millions in.
FACT live with it.
Bradford and wakefield went bust in SL on their attendances
FACT live with it.
Salford are close to administraton on their attendances despite what Wilko puts in.
FACT live with it
HKR lose hundreds of thousands on their attendances.
FACT live with it.
Widnes do not break even
FACT live with it.
this is the silly contrived argument that if all the above clubs are in SL and failing why cant Oldham and sheffield and keighley and leigh also be in Superleague equally failing?
Because they have even less resources than the clubs you name, and would be even bigger disasters
Simple isn't it.
No. it's not quite that simple. the fact that Oldham etc don't have resources today does not mean that they never will have resources.
Huddersfield had nothing, they were facing extinction back in the day playing at Fartown. Along came the stadium, thanks I think, to the council, along came Davy with the money and up went the crowds, along came the success, relativelty speaking, and now they are one of the top teams in SL.
Hull KR were not far off, in fact, they were in administration. Along came Hudgell, along came the grants for the ground and they are now in SL. Yes they have hit a bump in the road at the moment but look at where they have come from.
Widnes went bust, along came their money man, and along came Halton council and they are in SL on small attendances. Bradford went bust on big attendances, so attendances, whilst important are not the only determining factor. If they were London should be in CC.
In fact, even the big boys have been in big trouble. Leeds were on the skids before Caddick. Wigan were in trouble before Whelan and Lenaghan bailed them out. Warrington were bailed out from 5,000 attendances at Wilderspool to 10,000 at HJ by Moran.
Saints have had significant help from the M brothers.
Hull have been bailed out twice, the Gateshead merger and Pearson.
Then there's Wakefield, two time losers before Glover.
So there is not one SL club who have not had their troubles.
The evidence would appear to be therefore that in the right circumstances any club can be turned into a SL team. Is it easy ? No. Is it even probable? maybe not. Can it be done.? The answer would appear to be that it can.
Each case needs to be addressed on it's merits, which is what The RFL, in principle anyway, do with the licencing process and would also do on a standards based p and r process.
It used to be that the CC clubs were beaten around the head with stadium standards. Now a significant number of them have solved that problem then the argument shifts to crowds. Finances has always been part of the equation, but , overall, many CC clubs are way better bets for SL consideration that they were ten years ago. Time will tell, but for you to dismiss all CC clubs out of hand as never being able to reach SL standards smacks to me of a SL centric view of things which clouds your objectivity when discussing the subject.