I'm not sure what Myler has to do to prove himself tbh.
He plays consistently well week in week out in one of the best teams in the league, had a blinding game at Wembley, has improved his game week on week, yet for some reason people would rather see somebody like Lomax in there. Brough is talented, but he doesn;t do it week in week out, and certainly has never been properly tested at the highest level.
Banging your head against a brick wall Dave!!!
I've given up on getting upset when people slate / debate/ moan / troll / etc etc about our players!!!
Myler did well, created a few tries, did some things well and tackled better than most 7's - made a few errors, but so did England as a whole.
Myler isn't a poor player, like you said he's improved and deserves his chance ahead of Lomax and Brough *
* England doesn't need Brough and Sinfield playing in the same team IMHO
I'm not moaning/trolling/slagging/slating or in any other way being derogatory about Myler, I'm merely suggesting that the jury is out until he's been properly tested. That doesn't detract from his performances with Warrington in the League or in Cup finals, it merely means I'd like to see him against Australia or an on form New Zealand before declaring him World class.
Don't be so touchy, not everyone's got an axe to grind