Lee
Edited by morty, 04 November 2012 - 11:13 PM.
Posted 04 November 2012 - 11:12 PM
Edited by morty, 04 November 2012 - 11:13 PM.
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:57 AM
Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:08 AM
I got the connection with Widnes (not just a name change) straight away as per my sarcastic post above. Hope you guys dont go down the twinning route
Lee
Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:24 AM
Posted 05 November 2012 - 03:58 PM
i dont really buy into this link up thing as we ,in west cumbria,are too far from the rest of the RL world for it to benefit us. I cant see better players trailing up and down the M6 when they could get a game closer to home in the C'ship. However i suppose you can only try something to see if it works but as i say IMO i cant see it working for us.I mean u will be joining up with Widnes, as we are with the Saints.
HW
Posted 05 November 2012 - 05:23 PM
Posted 05 November 2012 - 07:06 PM
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction."
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."
Posted 05 November 2012 - 09:28 PM
There's a lot to be said letting lads develop in the local game.
However the RFL seem intent on wrecking the process by letting a pair of unscrupulous sneaky back stabbing tossers who don't care a stuff about cumbria and the players and our game and the local pro clubs will suffer because of it
Posted 07 November 2012 - 08:21 PM
The more clubs that say "No thanks " to this stupid twinning idea the better, all this does is keep the SL clubs fringe players match fit for when their parent club gets injuries, the championship club then has to replace these players with players who have been kept out of the team by these loanees and will be not as match fit!The way things are going in the Championships I think it is inevitable that Town will be twinned with a SL club or else we could lose out on players, which is what the RFL have hoped for all along. They wanted this system brought in to save SL clubs money and they have allowed a drip feed process to be used and as soon as 1 Championship club accepted then it was pretty obvious that others would follow. I still say that Cumbria clubs, especially us and Haven, will lose out in benefits, other than loanees, compared to other Championship clubs who are located closer to their SL partners.
Posted 14 November 2012 - 01:46 PM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 02:43 PM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 03:01 PM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 03:34 PM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 05:31 PM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 05:39 PM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 05:42 PM
Edited by Oracle, 14 November 2012 - 05:46 PM.
Posted 14 November 2012 - 05:43 PM
If widnes dont finish bottom, they'll finish next to bottom, which still dosnt fill you with awe ! With the exception of Salford, the rest of the teams in the bottom half of SL have recruited well.
Posted 14 November 2012 - 06:12 PM
But the youth team has hardly been outstanding for the Vikings. The likes of Wigan, Leeds, Saints and Warrington are light years ahead in player development, and the constant production of good youth teams shows this. Seriously think, that like Barrow, Town should have stayed independant. I understand that the laws regarding salary capping make 'twinning; more appealing since those players loaned from SL clubs dont count on the cap, but still, should have aimed higher than Widnes.
Haven have gone with Saints, since SL clubs are allowed to twin with more than one club, as Saints have done with Haven and ochdale, as long as they arent in the same demographic area. Town, if they wated to twin should have looked at a better SL club
Posted 14 November 2012 - 06:28 PM
Posted 14 November 2012 - 06:34 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users