@&#$ing cyclists version 2
Started by
Severus
, Nov 08 2012 06:51 AM
225 replies to this topic
#201
Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:02 PM
The 'eintracht' vision that motorists are consumed by when approaching the Sainsburys next door to me is a local phenomenon and causes regular incidents, some involving cyclists and pedestrians
(I appreciate that in these PC times one cannot generalize that the majority of tunnel vision driving seems to be done by women in pursuit of Nectar points, so I wont)
Its not till you get on a bike you realise that most motorists have no awareness at all of what a cyclist experiences through inconsiderate driving
(I appreciate that in these PC times one cannot generalize that the majority of tunnel vision driving seems to be done by women in pursuit of Nectar points, so I wont)
Its not till you get on a bike you realise that most motorists have no awareness at all of what a cyclist experiences through inconsiderate driving
#202
Posted 22 December 2012 - 04:15 PM
The 'eintracht' vision that motorists are consumed by when approaching the Sainsburys next door to me is a local phenomenon and causes regular incidents, some involving cyclists and pedestrians
(I appreciate that in these PC times one cannot generalize that the majority of tunnel vision driving seems to be done by women in pursuit of Nectar points, so I wont)
Its not till you get on a bike you realise that most motorists have no awareness at all of what a cyclist experiences through inconsiderate driving
I've done much more driving than cycling recently as I've been without a bike (bloody thieves). It really isn't difficult to share the road with cyclists. They aren't going to slow you down that much to warrant dangerous driving. I have no problem with them taking the lane and setting off early from traffic lights. Perhaps it's jealousy from drivers that cyclists can travel faster in urban traffic and are healthier
Fides invicta triumphat
#203
Posted 22 December 2012 - 06:51 PM
What stance is that?
Couldn't have put it better myself.That everyone has to get out of the way of cars.
"I don't see what all the fuss is about. I mean, it's only fair after last year isn't it? Look Neil, just for you, I've put my best Rovers' tie on today in the hope it'll go some way to make up for it. Oh, by the way, Jon sends his regards."
#204
Posted 22 December 2012 - 09:35 PM
That everyone has to get out of the way of cars.
But they don't have to get out of the way of every car, just MINE!
Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.
#205
Posted 23 December 2012 - 02:37 PM
Couldn't have put it better myself.
You have mistaken how i have put my posts across.
If someone opens a car door without checking that its clear. They are at fault 100%.
Car drivers are taught to be aware of other roads users. To think what will happen if someone makes a mistake. Motorbike learners are taught the same. They also learn defensive riding techniques. So they are aware of the problem of putting themselves in harms way.
I did not mean cyclists have to move out of the way of cars. My point was cyclists have to do the same to keep safe.
It has amazed me that some on here cant or wont see that. Taking into account how venerable cyclists are.
#206
Posted 23 December 2012 - 03:24 PM
If someone opens a car door without checking that its clear. They are at fault 100%
Odd then that your posts about the guy who opened his door and killed a cyclist seem to be very much trying to find a way to move blame from him to the dead guy.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012
- Severus, July 2012
#207
Posted 23 December 2012 - 03:29 PM
Odd then that your posts about the guy who opened his door and killed a cyclist seem to be very much trying to find a way to move blame from him to the dead guy.
Thats the way you have read it. Thats not what i meant.
I wanted to know why he was so close. I asked about the type of lane he was in. If that had anything to do with him being so close to the car.
#208
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:04 PM
You have mistaken how i have put my posts across.
If someone opens a car door without checking that its clear. They are at fault 100%.
Car drivers are taught to be aware of other roads users. To think what will happen if someone makes a mistake. Motorbike learners are taught the same. They also learn defensive riding techniques. So they are aware of the problem of putting themselves in harms way.
I did not mean cyclists have to move out of the way of cars. My point was cyclists have to do the same to keep safe.
It has amazed me that some on here cant or wont see that. Taking into account how venerable cyclists are.
If that really is the case, all other road users should move aside and doff their caps every time they see a cyclist.
"I don't see what all the fuss is about. I mean, it's only fair after last year isn't it? Look Neil, just for you, I've put my best Rovers' tie on today in the hope it'll go some way to make up for it. Oh, by the way, Jon sends his regards."
#209
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:33 PM
This chap springs to mind:
"I own up. I am a serial risk taker. I live in a flood zone, cycle without a helmet, drink alcohol and on Sunday I had bacon for breakfast."
#210
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:35 PM
Great Freudian slip mate!
If that really is the case, all other road users should move aside and doff their caps every time they see a cyclist.
No slip at all.
Cyclists having very little, if any protection when a accident happens. They should be more aware of the danger they can be in.
#211
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:51 PM
Pardon me then, I thought perhaps you meant "vulnerable" rather than "venerable".No slip at all.
Cyclists having very little, if any protection when a accident happens. They should be more aware of the danger they can be in.
"I don't see what all the fuss is about. I mean, it's only fair after last year isn't it? Look Neil, just for you, I've put my best Rovers' tie on today in the hope it'll go some way to make up for it. Oh, by the way, Jon sends his regards."
#212
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:55 PM
Who...giwildgo?This chap springs to mind:
"I don't see what all the fuss is about. I mean, it's only fair after last year isn't it? Look Neil, just for you, I've put my best Rovers' tie on today in the hope it'll go some way to make up for it. Oh, by the way, Jon sends his regards."
#213
Posted 23 December 2012 - 07:59 PM
Pardon me then, I thought perhaps you meant "vulnerable" rather than "venerable".
Doh.................sorry i now see what i have done
#214
Posted 23 December 2012 - 08:14 PM
No worries, it was fantastic!Doh.................sorry i now see what i have done
"I don't see what all the fuss is about. I mean, it's only fair after last year isn't it? Look Neil, just for you, I've put my best Rovers' tie on today in the hope it'll go some way to make up for it. Oh, by the way, Jon sends his regards."
#215
Posted 24 December 2012 - 10:16 AM
That's a relief.Who...giwildgo?
I was a bit worried you wouldn't recognise him.
"I own up. I am a serial risk taker. I live in a flood zone, cycle without a helmet, drink alcohol and on Sunday I had bacon for breakfast."
#216
Posted 24 December 2012 - 12:36 PM
No slip at all.
Cyclists having very little, if any protection when a accident happens. They should be more aware of the danger they can be in.
As an avid cyclist, this is probably the best advice any cyclist can take, cos let's face it not matter how much polystyrene you wear, or how many bright halogen lamps you adorn yourself with, you WILL con of second best in any collision.
#217
Posted 24 December 2012 - 01:00 PM
It is of course incumbent upon all of us to take care of the most vulnerable and venerable in society. Of course, people should look out for themselves, but shouldn't we be concentrating stopping offenders rather than saying the victims should have taken more care?
#218
Posted 24 December 2012 - 01:28 PM
It is of course incumbent upon all of us to take care of the most vulnerable and venerable in society. Of course, people should look out for themselves, but shouldn't we be concentrating stopping offenders rather than saying the victims should have taken more care?
Yes
"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin
#219
Posted 09 January 2013 - 11:32 AM
Interesting infographic about cyclists jumping red lights. I didn't think it would be as high as 16%.
Fides invicta triumphat
#220
Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:41 PM
The other side of the coin. A cyclist's life is now officially worth £35
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













