Good on Prince Charles
#1
Posted 11 November 2012 - 12:58 PM
#2
Posted 11 November 2012 - 02:20 PM
What did he do out of the ordinary?
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#3
Posted 11 November 2012 - 02:35 PM
Him going there got Rugby League positive publicity.Why good on him?
What did he do out of the ordinary?
#4
Posted 11 November 2012 - 02:38 PM
Closer each day, Home and Away.
#5
Posted 11 November 2012 - 02:44 PM
Not sure , but it was on the national news in Australia and Rugby League was seen in a postive light is my point.And was that his decision ?
#6
Posted 11 November 2012 - 03:19 PM
"The SMC's principal responsibility is to remain neutral"
#7
Posted 11 November 2012 - 03:37 PM
#8
Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:17 PM
The Aussies chose to keep Queenie as boss lady, by voting in favour of doing so I believe.Good to see the royals visiting the colonies and their subjects is Australia. Long live the empire!
And besides, we need to keep a close eye on the convicts.
Edited by Saintslass, 11 November 2012 - 04:17 PM.
#9
Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:21 PM
Maybe an invite to his two sons to attend the opener at the Millenium is worth a thought as well.
#10
Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:59 PM
The Aussies chose to keep Queenie as boss lady, by voting in favour of doing so I believe.
And besides, we need to keep a close eye on the convicts.
The Aussies only voted for Queenie as boss because he alternative system that was proposed would have ment they still didn't get to vote on head of state/presedent ,instead only those the people elected would have then in turn elected a head of state ,so they thought safer the current way at least they still got to vote for top man/lady
#11
Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:07 PM
And yet, and yet ... in poll after poll in the dear old antipodean colony, the people keep on saying yes to Queenie being boss lady. It frustrates the hell out of the present PM.The Aussies only voted for Queenie as boss because he alternative system that was proposed would have ment they still didn't get to vote on head of state/presedent ,instead only those the people elected would have then in turn elected a head of state ,so they thought safer the current way at least they still got to vote for top man/lady
#12
Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:13 PM
And yet, and yet ... in poll after poll in the dear old antipodean colony, the people keep on saying yes to Queenie being boss lady. It frustrates the hell out of the present PM.
They've been asked once, in a very bizarre referendum.
Julia Gillard has said she isn't in favour of a republic until the current monarch shuffles off this mortal.
- Severus, July 2012
#13
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:46 PM
Him going there got Rugby League positive publicity.
Oh yeah I forgot, RL is really low key in Australia.
John Ray (1627 - 1705)
#14
Posted 11 November 2012 - 07:57 PM
As he is now aware of what Rugby League is, perhaps now is the time for the RFL to contact Prince Charles to invite him to present the World Cup trophy next year.
Maybe an invite to his two sons to attend the opener at the Millenium is worth a thought as well.
No thanks. Why invite these people who have no real interest or connection with the game? Personally I would rather it be given by a former winning captain or a legend like Ellery Hanley.
#15
Posted 11 November 2012 - 08:13 PM
No thanks. Why invite these people who have no real interest or connection with the game? Personally I would rather it be given by a former winning captain or a legend like Ellery Hanley.
For the publicity, perhaps? We get precious little as it stands.
Rethymno Rugby League Appreciation Society
Founder (and, so far, only) member.
#16
Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:08 PM
For the publicity, perhaps? We get precious little as it stands.
My feelings exactly. I am no royalist, but public perception would be that it must be a big occasion if royalty are in attendance.
I would agree that as many ex-international players as possible should be involved in the World Cup in some way as possible.
#17
Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:11 PM
She's as republican as they come. She just knows that the public mood isn't in her favour at present. If Wills were to become the next monarch, I doubt it would be then either.Julia Gillard has said she isn't in favour of a republic until the current monarch shuffles off this mortal.
#18
Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:13 PM
Firstly, how do you know they don't have an interest in the game? Have you personally asked them about it?Why invite these people who have no real interest or connection with the game?
Secondly, having one of the sons would be a coup. Either would do although Wills would be preferable, since he is heir to the throne. That would bring automatic kudos and recognition to our sport, and the media would perk up and be interested, which is exactly what we need.
I do hope the RFL have bagged one of the sons. They certainly should be aiming to do so.
#19
Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:14 PM
Oh yeah I forgot, RL is really low key in Australia.
Quite. It was Charles who was after the decent publicity.
#20
Posted 11 November 2012 - 10:40 PM
Just because they are invited doesn't mean that they will attend.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













