Rumoured signing
#21
Posted 24 November 2012 - 07:41 AM
I am however prepared to be proved wrong and will await his performances before I judge fully on this,give him a chance and don't put the lad down from the start?
#22
Posted 24 November 2012 - 01:09 PM

#23
Posted 24 November 2012 - 04:46 PM
#24
Posted 24 November 2012 - 05:15 PM
In my view it doesn't matter who is signed if they are on match terms only. I may be a long way out but I don't think so.

#25
Posted 24 November 2012 - 05:18 PM
#26
Posted 25 November 2012 - 12:41 AM
A lot of the messages on this stream are silly and becoming typical of what is being put on this Forum. Only the BOD and players concerned should know the details of any signed and agreed contract. There are bound to be a number of players who are on match terms only and if such a player does not play it costs the club nothing. The club simply cannot afford to put every player on a contract containing a weekly wage, appearance money and match bonus.
In my view it doesn't matter who is signed if they are on match terms only. I may be a long way out but I don't think so.
if you were a player signing for barrow, would you agree to sign to only earn money if you get a game?
there will be a few players who have signed again and will probably know they wont be getting a game. someone like marwood who has mossop, dandy, finch, probably pedley in front of him will know he wont play so i would be amazed if he has signed on terms where he only gets paid if he plays.
we will never know what terms each player is on (which is private to each player), but for me, i just think the lads who will be making numbers up in the squad wont have signed pay as you play deals.
#27
Posted 25 November 2012 - 01:41 AM
The fox running with the hounds
When you are in deep trouble, say nothing, and try to look as though you know what you're doing
.
#28
Posted 25 November 2012 - 09:47 PM
#29
Posted 25 November 2012 - 09:54 PM
#30
Posted 25 November 2012 - 09:58 PM
well that rules him out then, if its our biggest signing then it has to be a current SL player, Doesnt it?Brett is going pro in his fighting so I can't see it being him...
and it has to be a forward surely!
Edited by shun, 25 November 2012 - 10:00 PM.
#31
Posted 25 November 2012 - 10:10 PM
#32
Posted 25 November 2012 - 10:15 PM
#33
Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:44 AM
I agree that to be a 'big' signing it has to be a player with SL experience, but cant think of anyone whos OCC and free other than Vinnie Anderson
#34
Posted 26 November 2012 - 11:14 AM
I am super impatient,
#35
Posted 26 November 2012 - 11:32 AM
Could always be an overseas import ?
Edited by morty, 26 November 2012 - 11:33 AM.
#36
Posted 26 November 2012 - 01:33 PM
#37
Posted 26 November 2012 - 01:39 PM
#38
Posted 26 November 2012 - 03:08 PM
OMG have we got Kylie or Cheryl as half time entertainment ?
Love it hahaha...you have that little 'damo' dude with his medals...crowd pleaser
'damo is a town fan na na na na' or was it deano?
Edited by kieran, 26 November 2012 - 03:09 PM.
#39
Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:28 PM
Just be a little more patient it'll soon be revealed.
It might be revealed at the Raiders Quiz night on Saturday so get there
#40
Posted 27 November 2012 - 07:16 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













