Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 402

Try our Fantastic 5-Issue Bundle Offer! For just £18, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:
The Play-offs Issue - pictured (out 12 Sept) – Covering the climax of the Super League & Championship seasons
The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final excitement from both sides of the world plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Opinions


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Bob Crowther

Bob Crowther
  • Coach
  • 2,661 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 12:46 PM

Now that they have voted to cut out the shoulder charge, down under, should we be following suite?. IMO, there is nothing wrong with a legal charge and the argument against it evolves from the fact that in many cases the shoulder charge almost always leads to the forearm and fist creeping up into the oppositions face and neck areas which can obviously cause serious damage. This is going to cause some problems for the refs and will no doubt lead to some dodgy decisions.
If such a tackle has to take place, surely it could be ruled that the arm of the aggressor has to be carried down by his side in order to prevent use of the forearm.

#2 thundergaz

thundergaz
  • Coach
  • 2,687 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 01:14 PM

Now that they have voted to cut out the shoulder charge, down under, should we be following suite?. IMO, there is nothing wrong with a legal charge and the argument against it evolves from the fact that in many cases the shoulder charge almost always leads to the forearm and fist creeping up into the oppositions face and neck areas which can obviously cause serious damage. This is going to cause some problems for the refs and will no doubt lead to some dodgy decisions.
If such a tackle has to take place, surely it could be ruled that the arm of the aggressor has to be carried down by his side in order to prevent use of the forearm.


I think it all depends on the type of player bob. If the player is a decent lad and no intentions of smashing his opposite number then the shoulder charge will work but if you have a guy like rangi shoulder chase then the shoulder charge should be banned. But I think it's all up to the players to play the shoulder charge properly I know they will be accidents but I don't mind them if their isn't any intent.

Edited by thundergaz, 26 November 2012 - 01:15 PM.


#3 jamescolin

jamescolin
  • Coach
  • 3,170 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:37 PM

Eric Batten was an expert at the shoulder charge Bob. He always went shoulder to shoulder, very effectively. Nothing wrong with it if executed properly. So lets keep it and severely penalise people who deliberately set out to injure.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users