I did wonder whether there was a certain degree of "toungue-in-cheek" about it.
If not I'd ask what all those different names ever did for Bronquins.
Jump to content
Posted 29 November 2012 - 05:56 PM
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:28 PM
don'nt the manchester storm & giants own british record attendances for their respective sports while they existed in the last 1990's?
Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:32 PM
the 8TH most successful team in british RL
Posted 30 November 2012 - 02:30 PM
And they play each other in the 2nd round of the FA Cup, that should be interesting, the chairman (I think) of MK Dons was quoted as saying if he had to do the move again, he wouldn't.
MK Dons / AFC Wimbledon spring to mind. They are almost in the same division these days.
Posted 02 December 2012 - 08:59 PM
17,500 full house at Manchester arena v Sheffield Steelers both storm and the giants 'were owned by large american companies in the case of storm they where owned by the same company that managed the arena who pumped a lot of money into them until they no longer needed them to fill spare capacity at the arena now owened by a local buisness man who was a fan and playing at Altrincham
I think you're right. Manchester Storm attracted something like 16,000. Now they play in the English Premier League, which is the league below the Elite League where my team, Hull Stingrays play. But less of them, we were hammered 7-2 last night; the best £15 I ever spent ha!
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:24 AM
Posted 04 December 2012 - 04:36 PM
Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:22 PM
Mergers, Rebranding and club relocations are not as bad and evil as certain Rugby League fans suggest and can actually go along way towards revitalising a sport in a specific area.
One of the main arguments that a fan of a said club will use not to Merge/Rebrand/Relocate is 'tradition', well history has proved that some of the top sporting clubs in England have done one of the three prior to becoming bigger sporting entities, examples.....
Started as Stanley Football Club, Was renamed Newcastle East End, Merged with Rosewood FC of Byker, Merged with Newcastle West End their biggest North East rivals to then become Newcastle United.
Started as Newton Heath, playing in green and gold was taken over by a local consortium and then became Manchester United
Started as Dial Square playing in Woolwich, South London, was renamed Royal Arsenal and then Woolwich Arsenal. Afterwards moved to North London and finally became the Arsenal that we see now.
Was initially called Everton Athletic and then eventually Liverpool F.C.
Rugby League success story: Catalan Dragons
Born out of a merger between X111 Catalan and St.Esteve, two local rivals
My point.....that mergers, relocations and rebranding is a part of the history of british sport, the 4 biggest sporting enitities have each gone through this process and rugby league clubs shouldn't be afriad of this......
Now Salford area proud club with a proud tradition but they have been poorly managed and have missed out on the opportunity to maximise opportunities from the stadium move and now look like being overshadowed by Sale, what they need is for a new investor to come in spend money on the club and rename them Manchester Reds, they have great potential but a lack of vision is there....nothing wrong with a name change or two......from a London Broncos( Harlequins RL, Crusaders) supporter.
Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:01 PM
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:49 AM
Posted 05 December 2012 - 05:29 PM
excuse me my friend, the club has been liverpool since day one!!!! everton were the original tenents of anfield but couldn't afford the rent so they were kicked out by higsons brewery who owned the ground and a new club formed, they tried to call the club everton but that name was already registered with the FA and so they called the club liverpool afc because the local rugby union club was called liverpool fc and when the moved to sthelens and became liverpool-sthelens, liverpool FC became the official name of the club................
Posted 05 December 2012 - 05:35 PM
Mate, it's on Wikipedia.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 05:37 PM
Never heard of Newton Heath FC then...?
Posted 05 December 2012 - 05:40 PM
but newton heath didn't re-locate over 30 miles from their base. mk dons did.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 05:44 PM
only once in the history of sport i can recall a name change and change of location being successful, and that is mk dons fc......
Posted 05 December 2012 - 05:44 PM
They still changed their name though.
Its happened rather successfully in the NFL too.
I'm not saying its great, but your initial statement was pretty daft.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 07:42 PM
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:15 PM