NORTH WALES CRUSADERS
Started by
duffymoon
, Jan 13 2013 11:59 PM
19 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 13 January 2013 - 11:59 PM
Won at York today apparently.
#2
Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:08 AM
They played some decent rugby against us and the left winger Rob Massam would be a player id like at our club
#3
Posted 14 January 2013 - 08:59 AM
They did win and thoroughly deserved it but as is the norm in the warm-up games, NWC turned out what will almost be a first choice 17 whereas we had a very young side out.
The Knights will certainly suffer from the 'who are we getting and when' DR scenario as will all the unfancied scramblers in the Championship.
You do wonder the absolute value of warm-up games when as many of possibly six of your starting 17 in the league are not with you until the first league game ?
The Knights will certainly suffer from the 'who are we getting and when' DR scenario as will all the unfancied scramblers in the Championship.
You do wonder the absolute value of warm-up games when as many of possibly six of your starting 17 in the league are not with you until the first league game ?
#4
Posted 14 January 2013 - 10:10 AM
We Didnt have our dual reg players when we played NWC indeed we had some trialists involved but still managed a win.
#5
Posted 14 January 2013 - 10:15 AM
York put out a very young side, I wouldn't read too much into the result.
I hope the City Knights and their landlord do some improvement work on the pitch for this season - the state of the surface was an absolute disgrace last year.
I hope the City Knights and their landlord do some improvement work on the pitch for this season - the state of the surface was an absolute disgrace last year.
Rugby League - great game, shame about the administration.
#6
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:44 AM
Agreed Phil.How they ever were allowed to use it with all the pot holes and sand on it was beyond belief.York put out a very young side, I wouldn't read too much into the result.
I hope the City Knights and their landlord do some improvement work on the pitch for this season - the state of the surface was an absolute disgrace last year.
#7
Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:47 PM
Agreed Phil.How they ever were allowed to use it with all the pot holes and sand on it was beyond belief.
Nothing wrong with the pitch now & please get over-confident about our result yesterday.
#8
Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:58 PM
I agree we shouldn't read too much into Yorks pre season result should we?
The only time when pre season results have any relevance is when its our own
Of course in those instances if we play bsdly it means our season is doomed and our stadium will never be built.
The only time when pre season results have any relevance is when its our own
Of course in those instances if we play bsdly it means our season is doomed and our stadium will never be built.
#9
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:30 PM
i think you right about the stadium not being built, seems to have gone very quiet on that front?.I agree we shouldn't read too much into Yorks pre season result should we?
The only time when pre season results have any relevance is when its our own
Of course in those instances if we play bsdly it means our season is doomed and our stadium will never be built.
#10
Posted 14 January 2013 - 02:25 PM
Yes indeed ,in fact I propose the deletion of all threads and lets just have one big one leading back to this subject on every single possible occasion.i think you right about the stadium not being built, seems to have gone very quiet on that front?.
#11
Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:02 PM
Think you launched one over somebody's head Mark!
"no-one knows what it's like to be the bad man.........behind blue eyes"
#12
Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:33 PM
Now it's been mentioned I recall Paul Kidd said at the shirt launch that a planning application would be submitted in the first two weeks of January!.I can't help thinking that all the negative publicity surrounding Salford will cost us! We are all doomed !
#13
Posted 14 January 2013 - 06:20 PM
Im not so sure. I think there's a possibility that they aren't as daft as they make out.Think you launched one over somebody's head Mark!
#14
Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:17 AM
I see Wakefield hammered Featherstone too. I reckon we might finish above them this year.....
#15
Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:02 PM
I see Wakefield hammered Featherstone too. I reckon we might finish above them this year.....
You never know Mark - I like your sense of humour and one thing I think we have in common is that we stay positive about our club
#16
Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:53 PM
I see Wakefield hammered Featherstone too. I reckon we might finish above them this year.....
Your bookmaker must be rich.
Rugby League - great game, shame about the administration.
#17
Posted 15 January 2013 - 06:48 PM
Your bookmaker must be rich.
My local bookmaker is Fred Done. Hes very very rich
He has no shops near me but his massive house is a stones throw away
I've not helped him buy it as I've never ever put a bet on .
I suspect you have.
Edited by mark richardson, 15 January 2013 - 06:49 PM.
#18
Posted 15 January 2013 - 08:08 PM
Absolutely sir. We are after all "supporters."You never know Mark - I like your sense of humour and one thing I think we have in common is that we stay positive about our club
#19
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:23 PM
The use of the word "supporters" is being used very loosely.
#20
Posted 16 January 2013 - 03:23 PM
Especially when pre fixed with the word all.
I do apologise .
I do apologise .
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













