Widnes dual reg players agreement
#41
Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:02 AM
I'd argue that right now we aren't feeding anyone as the only thing we are doing is giving fringe players game time. But who's to say they won't give Brett etc a once over and maybe fancy giving them a go, but the club would never stand in anyone's way if a SL club came knocking anyway so what's the difference?
My view for this season is that there are so many of the clubs in the championship doing it that we can't afford not to. Barrow may be doing it the purists way but what happens if they get relegated and are in Champ 1 next year. Who is right and wrong??
I know what you mean Holymoly but it isn't such a black and white issue.
#42
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:10 AM
#43
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:16 AM
Each player has been given a notional value by the RFL (Governed by their parent Club actual salary). So anytime a player (with the exception of U21s) plays on dual reg, the dual reg receiving club has to absorb the players notional value on to their salary cap returns. Thus intending to prevent a glut of top players playing week in week out.
Also, there is a restriction on players being involved in the latter stages of the competition. The player has to have played a defined number of games to be able to play in the last eight weeks of competition - up to the play offs.
These, along with other measures will go a long way to protecting the integrity of the competition.
#44
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:27 AM
Just to clarify some of the concerns within this thread. What people may not be aware if is that the RFL have produced a whole list of governance procedures, restrictions and criteria regarding the dual reg arrangements - particularly around salary cap and numbers of games permitted.
Each player has been given a notional value by the RFL (Governed by their parent Club actual salary). So anytime a player (with the exception of U21s) plays on dual reg, the dual reg receiving club has to absorb the players notional value on to their salary cap returns. Thus intending to prevent a glut of top players playing week in week out.
Also, there is a restriction on players being involved in the latter stages of the competition. The player has to have played a defined number of games to be able to play in the last eight weeks of competition - up to the play offs.
These, along with other measures will go a long way to protecting the integrity of the competition.
Aye and the RFL has such a great track record of governing the salary cap???
Several SL clubs are facing financial ruin and are sticking to the salary cap according to the RFL. I fail to see how that is possible, given that the salary cap limits the amount of money a club can spend, depending on there income/revenue. The RFL also awarded Bradford a Grade B SL license a year later.........
Barrow broke the cap for 2 seasons running before the RFL discovered that a team consisting of umpteen full time ex-SL pro's was costing more than £300k a season to run. Come on get real! The couldn't organise a "pea soup" in a brewery
Edited by Pride & Heritage, 26 January 2013 - 10:42 AM.
#45
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:47 AM
But I still think you should have a known squad of around 25 players and only need dual reg if there is an injury crisis like we did mid season or Worky did later on last season.
Good luck to all the Cumbrian clubs for this coming season.
Lee
#46
Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:56 AM
This is not a dig at town more the system,if haven were to do the same I for one would not be happy
#47
Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:14 PM
Im sure you'd be pleased if Haven did the same and are just worried Town may have an advantage over you.
#48
Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:35 PM
You also have to consider the impact that could have on your own players.This where the system is floored ,how can being able to DR a full squad be good for the game,but that's another debate
As for being worried with the 2 props we have just signed and the 2 names mentioned coming from saints one thing I'm not doing is worrying about town
Edited by haven4ever, 26 January 2013 - 12:37 PM.
#49
Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:44 PM
#50
Posted 26 January 2013 - 01:02 PM
but as of now we' re quite content . Top class player getting a blow here ... Fine by me . Imagine what our guys will learn by the rub off .
But as I say , let's wait n see . If we see it as supplementing when needed rather than full absorption then great , and our BOD and coaches know the score and will use this wisely . Our guys will get the gig I'm sure , we' re full of quality ,and when numbers are light then we'll use the link , as we'll see early season . Look at the positives involved not the potential negatives down the line.
Edited by DavidM, 26 January 2013 - 01:07 PM.
#51
Posted 26 January 2013 - 01:18 PM
#52
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:04 PM
No I wouldn't be happy and if that is the case and Widnes have no input into who town get then why DR players the likes of brown who if fit you have no chance of getting.Think you are being very naive if you think Widnes don't see players getting a blow.out as an option
You also have to consider the impact that could have on your own players.This where the system is floored ,how can being able to DR a full squad be good for the game,but that's another debate
As for being worried with the 2 props we have just signed and the 2 names mentioned coming from saints one thing I'm not doing is worrying about town
So if you are not having another dig at Town tell me how Wood's can state that he will have the pick of players at Saints who are not in the first team squad for that week? That could include Roby, say, returning from injury. Would Wood's have no option but to play him if Saints say so? There's no difference other than Town and Widnes have said that the whole Widnes squad (except Hock and overseas visa players) would be dual registered. How can Wood's have the pick at Saints if they aren't so registered? If, you are saying that is not the case then which players at Saints are dual registered as I haven't seen any names publicised.
Edited by Keith T, 26 January 2013 - 04:05 PM.
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#53
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:11 PM
But who's to say they won't give Brett etc a once over
They have tried, can't afford him.
15-Jan-2012 Workington Town 26 Whitehaven 18
26-Feb-2012 Workington Town 44 Whitehaven 16
06-Apr-2012 Whitehaven 12 Workington Town 30
24-Jun-2012 Workington Town 30 Whitehaven 28
16-Sep-2012 Workington Town 26 Whitehaven 2
29-Mar-2013 Workington Town 28 Whitehaven 16
21-Apr-2013 Workington Town 16 Whitehaven 12
Is beating the Tax Dodgers getting boring - NOT A CHANCE!!
#54
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:13 PM
Edited by haven4ever, 26 January 2013 - 04:13 PM.
#55
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:16 PM
#56
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:27 PM
None are dual reg at the mo so how can you say its the same ,I think he will assess where we need improvment and then DR or season loan players to compliment that.quite a bit different to me
Which is what Charlo and Oggy will be doing the only difference is that they don't have to wait until the week before to register the players, which, incidentally, I don't accept for one minute is what Dave Woods will be doing either. He and Saints will know now which players they are talking about and they will be registered now.
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#57
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:38 PM
Back to your point Keith
I'm not saying he will wait until each week,I'm saying he will have assessed the squad so far and carrying on doing so then DR /loan players in positions he wants to strengthen ,not DR a full squad and pick at random
I'd expect Adam swift to be one as we have little cover for the wing,also I'd expect a prop/2nd row ,but I don't expect and I'd be very disappointed if we DR the full squad cause to me that is the start of a slippery slope .you may think not and that's fine time will tell how it operates
Edited by haven4ever, 26 January 2013 - 04:40 PM.
#58
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:43 PM
#59
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:52 PM
"It is impossible not to feel a twinge of sympathy for Workington Town, the fall guys this season for the Super League's determination to retain it's European dimesion, in the shape of Paris. While the French have had every assistance to survive, the importance of having a flagship in a heartland area like West Cumbria has been conveniently forgotten." - Dave hadfield - Independent 25th Augsut 1996.
#60
Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:05 PM
Ah there we go, I knew this cretin couldnt go more than 2 posts without acting the ######. Well done, now sod off will ya, adults are talking.
think you will find geordie town started the slagging not me
Edited by haven4ever, 26 January 2013 - 05:23 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













