Jump to content


Rugby League World Issue 402

Try our Fantastic 5-Issue Bundle Offer! For just £18, a saving of 10% on the regular cover price, you’ll get:
The Play-offs Issue - pictured (out 12 Sept) – Covering the climax of the Super League & Championship seasons
The Grand Finals Issue (out 17 Oct) – Grand Final excitement from both sides of the world plus Four Nations preview
The Four Nations Issue (out 21 Nov) – Fantastic coverage of the Four Nations tournament down under
The Golden Boot Issue (out 19 Dec) – A look back at the 2014 season plus the big reveal of the winner of the Golden Boot
The 2015 Season Preview Issue (out 23 Jan) – How will your team perform in 2015? We preview every club.


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Coalition government not sure whether bears defecate in the woods


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 Severus

Severus
  • Coach
  • 12,860 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:55 AM

I would laugh if the situation wasn't so tragic.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...litics-21190108
Fides invicta triumphat

#2 Wolford6

Wolford6
  • Coach
  • 10,068 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 11:08 AM

The s*** bears the woods.
;) :)


http://www.alisonjac...ttle-golf/golf/

Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police


#3 WearyRhino

WearyRhino
  • Coach
  • 3,209 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 11:11 AM

I would laugh if the situation wasn't so tragic.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...litics-21190108


Clegg has to be the most politically and economically illiterate leader of any of the main UK political parties in living memory. Fortunately, he and has party are heading for complete political obscurity in 2 years time. Sadly, despite his woeful incompetence he will end of with some well paid City, lobbying or diplomatic job post the next GE.

Edited by WearyRhino, 25 January 2013 - 12:22 PM.

LUNEW.jpg


#4 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,124 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 12:16 PM

I would laugh if the situation wasn't so tragic.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...litics-21190108


It is worth pointing out again that if you voted for any mainstream party other than the Greens then you voted for massive cuts.

You can kid yourself you didn't, but you did.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#5 WearyRhino

WearyRhino
  • Coach
  • 3,209 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 12:25 PM

It is worth pointing out again that if you voted for any mainstream party other than the Greens then you voted for massive cuts.

You can kid yourself you didn't, but you did.


It is worth pointing out again that if you voted Lib Dem you voted Tory.

LUNEW.jpg


#6 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,124 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 12:27 PM

It is worth pointing out again that if you voted Lib Dem you voted Tory.


Bless.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#7 Severus

Severus
  • Coach
  • 12,860 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 02:45 PM

It is worth pointing out again that if you voted for any mainstream party other than the Greens then you voted for massive cuts.

You can kid yourself you didn't, but you did.

Yep, I voted Lib Dem. I agree that cuts needed to be made, but not with the zeal that the coalition government did it.
Fides invicta triumphat

#8 Padge

Padge
  • Coach
  • 18,081 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 05:21 PM

Yep, I voted Lib Dem. I agree that cuts needed to be made, but not with the zeal that the coalition government did it.


It was nothing other than ideological zeal, without thought for consequences, it was a case of we have the opportunity and we have the excuse, so lets do it.

Visit my photography site www.padge.smugmug.com
Radio 5 Live: Saturday 14 April 2007
Dave Whelan "In Wigan rugby will always be king"

 

This country's wealth was created by men in overalls, it was destroyed by men in suits.


#9 longboard

longboard
  • Coach
  • 2,349 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 08:08 PM

Sic, sunt ursi defaecatum est in silvis nostris.

#10 Griff9of13

Griff9of13
  • Coach
  • 5,631 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 09:49 AM

It was nothing other than ideological zeal, without thought for consequences, it was a case of we have the opportunity and we have the excuse, so lets do it.


Absolutely, the problem is not so much that they are making cuts, but where those cuts are being made. The tories are just making the most of The opportunity they have been given to dismantle the welfare state. IMO they are doing this for ideological reasons and nothing else. That's the problem with ideology; it always trumps common sense in the end and therefore should never be trusted in politics.

"it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it."

#11 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 15,119 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:21 AM

It was nothing other than ideological zeal, without thought for consequences, it was a case of we have the opportunity and we have the excuse, so lets do it.

Spot on.
"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#12 Trojan

Trojan
  • Coach
  • 15,119 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:24 AM

It's true Labour planned cuts. But only 50% of what Osborne dished out. It's also true that Labour planned cuts in captial spending, but then we did have 2% growth at the time. Osborne's first budget had killed that stone dead by Christmas 2010. TBF nothing had actually happened by then, but everyone knew (apart from Osborne presumably) what was about to happen and had had the living ###### scared out of them.
"Your a one trick pony Trojan" - Parksider 10th March 2013

#13 Saintslass

Saintslass
  • Coach
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:28 PM

It's true Labour planned cuts. But only 50% of what Osborne dished out. It's also true that Labour planned cuts in captial spending, but then we did have 2% growth at the time. Osborne's first budget had killed that stone dead by Christmas 2010.

How do you know that Labour's version of cuts would have not had a similar effect? There was always going to be a point at which cuts - any cuts - would have started to have impact. Cutting budgets at a slower rate might actually have drawn out the flat economy for an even longer period or it might not. We won't ever know because that is not the road that was taken. However, the US, which I believe took a similar path to the one you say Labour proposed, is still on very shakey ground having only recently seen off (for now) falling off the 'fiscal cliff' and meanwhile their debt keeps on rising.

#14 Bedford Roughyed

Bedford Roughyed
  • Moderator
  • 5,239 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 01:27 PM

However, the US, which I believe took a similar path to the one you say Labour proposed, is still on very shakey ground having only recently seen off (for now) falling off the 'fiscal cliff' and meanwhile their debt keeps on rising.

The fiscal cliff was a very specific USA only issue. Nothing to do with spending way out or austerity.
With the best, thats a good bit of PR, though I would say the Bedford team, theres, like, you know, 13 blokes who can get together at the weekend to have a game together, which doesnt point to expansion of the game. Point, yeah go on!

#15 gingerjon

gingerjon
  • Coach
  • 29,124 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 01:34 PM

It's true Labour planned cuts. But only 50% of what Osborne dished out.


I think the figures put forward at the time of the election were within 10% of each other. The other difference was timescale. Labour said they would take an additional six months to reach that cutting amount.
Cheer up, RL is actually rather good
- Severus, July 2012

#16 Northern Sol

Northern Sol
  • Moderator
  • 17,165 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 02:45 PM

It was nothing other than ideological zeal, without thought for consequences, it was a case of we have the opportunity and we have the excuse, so lets do it.


Normally when people make definite statements you ask how they could know these things. Who is your source at Number 10?

#17 Saintslass

Saintslass
  • Coach
  • 4,467 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:31 PM

The fiscal cliff was a very specific USA only issue. Nothing to do with spending way out or austerity.

Not strictly true because the debt problem, and how to deal with the debt ceiling (above which, I believe, the US would be technically bankrupt) was one element to negotiations.

#18 Marauder

Marauder
  • Coach
  • 11,800 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:02 PM

How do you know that Labour's version of cuts would have not had a similar effect? There was always going to be a point at which cuts - any cuts - would have started to have impact. Cutting budgets at a slower rate might actually have drawn out the flat economy for an even longer period or it might not. We won't ever know because that is not the road that was taken. However, the US, which I believe took a similar path to the one you say Labour proposed, is still on very shakey ground having only recently seen off (for now) falling off the 'fiscal cliff' and meanwhile their debt keeps on rising.

the USA didn't take the exact same route that Gordon Brown set,

Would Britain have been better off in the eurozone?
Wow! I suppose there’s always some argument people could make, but, my God! Cameron and Osborne love to claim credit for Britain’s low borrowing costs, but in fact those seem to be overwhelmingly the result of the UK not being in the euro. Even now, with everything going on, Spain’s fiscal prospects look no worse and maybe better than Britain’s and yet interest rates there are 6.6 per cent and 1.6 per cent here. I actually think they ought to put up statue to Gordon Brown in Trafalgar Square to thank him for keeping Britain out of the euro. It would have been an utter disaster if Britain had joined.

Did Gordon Brown “save the world” in 2008?
I think it’s arguably right. We now look back in those six months after Lehman Brothers failed [in October 2008] and policymakers did the right things. They did what was necessary to stop a complete financial collapse. We now talk as if that was fated to happen, but maybe not. Clearly it was Gordon Brown who moved first in doing the bank recapitalisation. Without that maybe the people who thought it was great idea to let Lehman fail to eliminate moral hazard might have continued to carry the argument for another couple of months, by which time it might have been irreversible.
Carlsberg don't do Soldiers, but if they did, they would probably be Brits.



http://www.pitchero....hornemarauders/

#19 Northern Sol

Northern Sol
  • Moderator
  • 17,165 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 07:12 PM

Maurauder, it isn't quite that simple, Germany is in the Euro but has even lower interest rates. It is not much to do with the Euro and everything to do with the perceived risk of default.

#20 Padge

Padge
  • Coach
  • 18,081 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 07:17 PM

Normally when people make definite statements you ask how they could know these things. Who is your source at Number 10?

David Cameron.

Visit my photography site www.padge.smugmug.com
Radio 5 Live: Saturday 14 April 2007
Dave Whelan "In Wigan rugby will always be king"

 

This country's wealth was created by men in overalls, it was destroyed by men in suits.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users