Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

The annual WCC expansion news article


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 South Wakefield Sharks

South Wakefield Sharks
  • Coach
  • 2,224 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 11:14 AM

Article in League Weekly today about the possibility of expanding the WCC. It's the usual stuff that gets dusted down this time every year and never leads to anything different.

There are loads of difficulties of organising anything, but if the will and finances were there, how could you make their best 3 v our best 3 work and not simply be two meaningless curtain raisers before the big event?

Could it really be marketed as SL v NRL? Each club would obviously glory in beating their specific opponents, but would people buy into it, if for example, the winners of the 3rd placed match earned a point for their comp, the winners of the 2nd placed 2 points and the winner of the two champs 3 points.

You might end up with lots of ties, no problem there, but the overall winners would never be decided until the final game.

Would people (fans, sponsors, media etc) not associated with the teams directly involved, be more likely to buy into the concept?

#2 roughyedspud

roughyedspud
  • Coach
  • 4,044 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 11:52 AM

if it's to be expanded it should be between the 4 teams that contested the grand finals.....


held over 2 weekends...NRL winner v SL runners up & SL winners v NRL runners up.......then a final for the winners.......simples

OLDHAM RLFC
the 8TH most successful team in british RL


#3 walter sobchak

walter sobchak
  • Coach
  • 1,957 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 11:56 AM

if it's to be expanded it should be between the 4 teams that contested the grand finals.....


held over 2 weekends...NRL winner v SL runners up & SL winners v NRL runners up.......then a final for the winners.......simples

Like it, would the 2 weekends be held in say the northern hemisphere 1 year and the southern hemisphere the year after?

#4 brooza

brooza
  • Moderator
  • 4,453 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 11:59 AM

Like it, would the 2 weekends be held in say the northern hemisphere 1 year and the southern hemisphere the year after?

Either that or each champion gets home advantage for semi final and the final alternates each year (or neutral, but not overly keen on that)
St Albans Centurions 1st Team Manager. Former Medway Dragons Wheelchair RL player.

Leeds Rhinos, St Albans Centurions y Griffons Madrid fan. Also follow (to a lesser extent) Catalans Dragons, London Broncos, South Sydney Rabbitohs, Jacksonville Axemen, Vrchlabi Mad Squirrels, København Black Swans, Red Star Belgrade and North Hertfordshire Crusaders.

Moderator of the International board

#5 walter sobchak

walter sobchak
  • Coach
  • 1,957 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:11 PM

I quite liked the 1997 world club championship concept(remember knocking off school to watch some matches on sky) apart from the English clubs results and the fact that all 12 teams took part which was too many. A top 4 or even a top 8 team tournament would have been better given the fact of the super league would have been in only it's 2nd year as a competition and the super league war down under. IIRC didn't the new Aussie team hunter mariners or whatever they were called win it or get to the final?

#6 roughyedspud

roughyedspud
  • Coach
  • 4,044 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:15 PM

yep just alternate between northern & southern hemispheres..


and yep the hunter mariners :lol:

Edited by roughyedspud, 28 January 2013 - 12:17 PM.

OLDHAM RLFC
the 8TH most successful team in british RL


#7 walter sobchak

walter sobchak
  • Coach
  • 1,957 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:16 PM

Either that or each champion gets home advantage for semi final and the final alternates each year (or neutral, but not overly keen on that)

Yeah I think there would be some grumbling about the travel involved and worries about if 2 Aussie teams make the final in England or 2 English teams(wishful thinking) make the final down under and it affecting the crowd.

#8 walter sobchak

walter sobchak
  • Coach
  • 1,957 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:27 PM

yep just alternate between northern & southern hemispheres..


and yep the hunter mariners :lol:

Sounds good but as usual it's trying to sell it to the Aussies and finding sponsorship for it.

#9 South Wakefield Sharks

South Wakefield Sharks
  • Coach
  • 2,224 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:28 PM

if it's to be expanded it should be between the 4 teams that contested the grand finals.....


held over 2 weekends...NRL winner v SL runners up & SL winners v NRL runners up.......then a final for the winners.......simples


Is the idea of two weekends, and the potential of an all NRL or all SL final, not a step too far from where we currently are with the WCC?

#10 roughyedspud

roughyedspud
  • Coach
  • 4,044 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:32 PM

Is the idea of two weekends, and the potential of an all NRL or all SL final, not a step too far from where we currently are with the WCC?


a step too far??

its the next logical step!

OLDHAM RLFC
the 8TH most successful team in british RL


#11 boxhead

boxhead
  • Coach
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 01:09 PM

Not easily sold In Australia.
Either Home or Away.

#12 roughyedspud

roughyedspud
  • Coach
  • 4,044 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 01:11 PM

thats cos they can't be arsed selling it

OLDHAM RLFC
the 8TH most successful team in british RL


#13 boxhead

boxhead
  • Coach
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 28 January 2013 - 01:53 PM

thats cos they can't be arsed selling it


What do they sell it as?
The best v the best?
Its only the strength of the interstate rivalry that keeps the SOO series alive.
That is the best v the best the game has to offer.
The reason the WCC is held when it is and where it is tells a tale.
Held in Oz mid May and it would be........ not good

Edited by AndyCapp, 28 January 2013 - 01:57 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users